Public-Private Collaboration – Essential for Disaster Risk Reduction

By Peter Williams, Chair, ARISE- US

Dr Peter Williams is Chair of ARISE-US, part of ARISE Global Network, the UN DRR's vehicle for public-private collaboration in disaster risk reduction. He was also the lead author of the UN City Disaster Resilience Scorecard, now used by over 330 cities globally, and a further Scorecard for the resilience of industrial and commercial buildings. He retired from IBM as a Distinguished Engineer in 2018.

Sep 1, 2021 | Environment, Governance | 1 comment

Who will you meet?

Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.

Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.


A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness.  One theme stood out to me more than any other.  The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans.  Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.

While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another? Following my earlier article on how DRR is a “team sport”, and how picking the right team “members” is essential, this article attempts to tease out areas where public private collaboration is desirable or essential for DRR.


Governments necessarily function as planners, convenors and instigators of DRR in their areas.  But the New Orleans experience brings the old saw to mind about leading a horse to water but not being able to make it drink.  Governments can emphasize, and provide support for, planning and preparedness as much they can.   They can repeat these messages regularly and make the necessary knowledge as accessible as they can.  But the business sector is called private enterprise for a reason: at some level, businesses have to respond on their own account.  They have to think through what they will need, and they have to make the necessary preparations.  This is as true of small and medium enterprises as it is of larger ones – but it tends to be the larger ones that understand it better!

At the same time, though, very few businesses can make themselves completely resilient on their own.  Consider a business that has invested in fully protecting its facilities and operations, and in back-up power and water.  The facilities have just survived a hurricane or an earthquake unscathed.  But if the workers cannot get to work because of blocked roads or damaged bridges, or because they need to repair their homes, or if supplies cannot reach the business, it will still lose production, perhaps for weeks.  Even proactive businesses need the government to step up and fill in what they cannot do for themselves, in this case repair the transportation system, and support workers in being able to get back to work.


Another factor that hinders what governments can do when planning DRR, or responding to disasters is that key infrastructure systems such as communications, energy and sometimes water will be in the hands of separate private sector entities, who may have other priorities.  They may accordingly be unwilling to share information about their assets and processes.  Observing the battles in some areas to get phone companies to improve the run-times for back-up generators on cellphone towers (as an example), it becomes clear that the resulting conflicts can directly impact the ability of government to manage a disaster and communicate what is required to the population.  In some US states, legislation has been required to gain the necessary collaboration.

Generally, of course, private utilities have a strong incentive to collaborate with governments, to warn of additional risks from their systems, expedite emergency approvals, coordinate access to damaged assets and so on.  That limits their liability; and it helps to expedite any repairs they may need to make, while improving crew and public safety.  Far-sighted governments are starting to use digital twin technologies to log the locations and identities of all utility system assets (both under and above ground) and share this information with all infrastructure system owners.  ARISE-US is working on a simple, free tool to allow cities to inventory their critical assets, in whatever infrastructure system they have, and log the interdependencies between these.


Governments cannot be expected to fund every aspect of disaster resilience (the huge payouts in many countries to blunt the impact of the COVID pandemic notwithstanding!).  They can fund some items; they can seed or underwrite investments in resilience; and they can ensure equity in spending.  But the growing role of public-private partnerships (PPPs), sustainability and disaster bonds, and the increasingly pro-active role of the insurance industry, indicates that the private sector sees an opportunity to participate by taking some of the financing load.   And let’s not overlook the obvious: every dollar that a business spends on making itself more resilient is at the same time an investment in protecting the local economy and local livelihoods – something any government will welcome.

Disaster Response

When disasters do happen, governments of whatever level rightly function as first responders, and coordinators of the total response effort.  That is not to imply, however, that they have to execute that response entirely unsupported.  Utilities will be responsible for restoring their services, but beyond that there will be contractors such as the companies that supply tanker planes, bulldozers and so on for fighting wildfires.  Some companies also have their own firefighters.

Others step up their activities to support their communities in the run-up to, and aftermath of, disasters, much as Walmart and Home Depot do in hurricane prone areas.  But governments could go further and copy the arrangement that is common in Japan, where they sign MOUs with companies in their areas that, in the event that a disaster is declared, each company will provide certain things depending on what it has to offer – warehouse space, trucks, a datacenter, pumps, and so on.  This arrangement also exists in some places in the US but is by no means as common as it could be.

Community Engagement

One area where businesses can help governments is by acting as communication channels with their workforce about DRR issues and preparations.  We are seeing this in many businesses with respect to COVID messaging from public health authorities.  However, the same principle could be applied to hurricane or earthquake awareness, as a natural adjunct of the preparations and communications that the business may be carrying out anyway as part of their continuity planning.  Some people may be more predisposed to believe what their employer is telling them as opposed to government; others, probably more numerous, just need to hear any message multiple times, from several sources, before it is taken to heart!

And to close the loop from where this article started, businesses are of course run by individuals who may have the same issues as their workers.  This might be an opportunity for Chambers of Commerce and other business organizations to help governments reach individual businesses, such as those in New Orleans, and persuade them of the need for disaster planning and show them how to go about it.


Neither government nor business “can do it all” when it comes to DRR.  High quality collaboration between public and private sectors will become the hallmark of truly resilient cities and states as population grows and as the climate changes.


Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

1 Comment

  1. Many times, what to do and be prepared for when disasters happen is the solution between all of us, but in general we never know when and how one of these will affect us, so high-quality collaboration between public and private is essential, before this happens.

    However, knowing the results and effects of disasters on what exists in technology and infrastructure, when something outside the known is proposed, it is found that everything is measured according to what is known and investors already installed are protected, however, A house, for example, that resists earthquakes and wind does not apply at this time, before a catastrophe happens, because it is unknown, or because there are no parameters for evaluation and investment of the new.

    A behavior like the above can be understood when resources are unlimited, such as money and the environment, or when it is thought that we are not part of nature, however, in the midst of the emergency as it already happens and what is predicts that it will come, with clear limits established by the law of nature itself, which are beyond human laws, institutions and the economic system, we still believe in what already exists and that leads us to the disaster of the planet, the car, the system economic, consumerism and its development and growth parameters, which affect us all globally. Looking at reality is sometimes stripping away what now gives us comfort, personal convenience and security, because we have this limited, while many solutions are waiting for high-quality collaboration.

    Thank you for your contribution in knowledge and experience.



Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

Planning for the New Mobilities

Planning for the New Mobilities

When planning for new mobilities, it is important to be a little skeptical. Advocates often exaggerate the benefits and overlook significant costs. Here’s an example. Optimists predict that autonomous cars will reduce traffic congestion, crash risk, energy consumption and pollution emissions, but to achieve these benefits they require dedicated lanes for platooning (many vehicles driving close together at relatively high speeds). When should communities dedicate special lanes for the exclusive use of autonomous vehicles? How much should users pay for the privilege? How should this be enforced? Who will be liable if a high-speed platoon crashes, resulting in a multi-vehicle pile-up?

Why Investing in Play Must Be Part of COVID Recovery

Why Investing in Play Must Be Part of COVID Recovery

Infrastructure is on the tip of every mayor’s tongue. It’s no wonder, with billions in federal funding on the table for the first time in a generation and rapidly compounding infrastructure needs. American Rescue Plan dollars represent a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to invest in communities, support resident priorities, and move the needle on racial equity all at the same time. Parks and playgrounds exist in an ideal sweet spot in each of these areas, and cities should consider making investments in these vital pieces of community infrastructure as part of their recovery and resilience strategies.

Picking the Right Team: Who Needs to Be Involved in Disaster Risk Reduction?

Picking the Right Team: Who Needs to Be Involved in Disaster Risk Reduction?

Cities and communities are “systems of systems”: they are complexes of interacting physical, environmental, infrastructural, economic and social systems. Each system may have a different owner and management chain, yet each needs to interact with the others to minimize risk from hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, wildfires and the like – as well as from pandemics. This means that disaster risk reduction (DRR – defined as disaster adaptation, mitigation, planning, response and recovery) is a “team sport”. In any community, let alone a large city or state, multiple “players”, from the public and private sectors, will be needed to complete the team. In my experience with DRR activities in cities and communities, however, key players may be omitted. This article identifies who the players are, and why they need to be involved as well as what that involvement should include.

The Future of Cities

Mayors, planners, futurists, technologists, executives and advocates — hundreds of urban thought leaders publish on Meeting of the Minds. Sign up to follow the future of cities.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Wait! Before You Leave —

Wait! Before You Leave —

Subscribe to receive updates on the Executive Cohort Program!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This