Picking the Right Team: Who Needs to Be Involved in Disaster Risk Reduction?
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Cities and communities are “systems of systems”: they are complexes of interacting physical, environmental, infrastructural, economic and social systems. Each system may have a different owner and management chain, yet each needs to interact with the others to minimize risk from hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, wildfires and the like – as well as from pandemics. This means that disaster risk reduction (DRR – defined as disaster adaptation, mitigation, planning, response and recovery) is a “team sport”. In any community, let alone a large city or state, multiple “players”, from the public and private sectors, will be needed to complete the team. In my experience with DRR activities in cities and communities, however, key players may be omitted. This article identifies who the players are, and why they need to be involved as well as what that involvement should include.
Who Should Be on the DRR Team?
Having worked with many cities over many years, I have found that when most people think of DRR, the roles that come immediately to mind tend to be the emergency management department, plus first responders (police, fire and ambulance). Think a little bit longer, and the hospital, electricity, water, sanitation, and perhaps highway and transportation systems will be affected. Many will realize that none of these systems can function without telecommunications.
DRR cannot function without the active engagement and participation of the owners and operators of these systems. But if we think a little more widely, other key players come forward for selection to the team, including those on the list below:
- Planning departments. Planners control land use and building codes, key aspects of disaster mitigation.
- Finance departments. What is the financial strategy for investing in DRR? Where will funds be sought, and by whom? How will post disaster funds be disbursed and accounted for?
- Human resources. What skills are needed throughout the city or community government, and how will these be acquired?
- Public health, where separate from healthcare, listed above. Quite apart from pandemic disasters, post disaster health issues may affect as many people as the disaster itself.
- Education. Schools are often used as shelters, but just as crucially, they play a critical role in educating children in DRR issues ranging from environmental awareness to how to prepare for a disaster. Children are a channel to their parents.
- Trash collection. Uncollected trash is a massive disease vector, so the trash collection agency or company needs to be involved where separate from sanitation.
Other Public Sector and NGOs
- Neighboring towns and cities. Disasters rarely respect urban boundaries, so for reasons of simple mutual aid or because there may be shared infrastructure (water systems, roads, hospitals for instance) there needs to be collaboration.
- Other tiers of government. State, provincial or national governments may be required to participate in making each city and community resilient. For example, where they control funding or access to additional emergency resources.
- Environmental interests. Cities and communities may depend on ecosystem services for disaster resilience, such as tree cover for urban heat reduction or wetlands for flood prevention. Who is looking after those services? (Keep in mind that the ecosystem in question may be many miles from your city or community).
- Universities. If research or study is needed on DRR issues for a city or community, a university may offer a way to get this done cheaply.
- Private sector operators of public infrastructure. Any of the key infrastructure and healthcare systems may be privately owned. Have the owners been engaged in DRR and are they actively participating?
- Large local businesses. Large businesses have a stake in DRR. Unless the local government does its part to protect infrastructure and enable workforces to get to work after a disaster, the business will be damaged. Businesses can be leveraged to communicate DRR awareness and knowledge to their workforce, and refrain from damaging ecosystem services. In some countries, arrangements exist for businesses to supply equipment, warehousing or skills in the event of a disaster.
- Small local businesses. Small businesses are often the economic “heartbeat” of a community, and yet may have only a few days’ cash on hand with which to survive a disaster. If these businesses go away, the economic recovery post-disaster will be undermined.
- Retailers. Of all businesses, as Walmart has repeatedly demonstrated in hurricane responses in the US, retailers of food and essentials have a critical role to play in the aftermath of a disaster. How prepared are they?
- Insurers. How are insurers measuring, pricing or even just covering risk in the city or community? How complete and accessible is that cover?
- Chambers of commerce. These can play an important intermediary role in engagement between government and business interest.
- Community groups. Saving perhaps the most critical of all until last, community groups have two broad roles.
- Citizens in general need to be aware of what might happen, what emergency responders can and cannot do, how to prepare and how to react when a disaster takes place. This is a continuous aspect of “team training” – not a one-time exercise.
- Cities and communities need a way to understand the interests and differences of different minorities – different risks (by virtue of where an ethnic minority may tend to live, for example), different languages, different physical abilities, different social customs and expectations. Community or interest groups can enable this understanding, without which DRR may fall dramatically short of what is needed.
How Do We Build the DRR team?
Cities and communities very likely won’t be able to persuade all of the players above to engage immediately. In my own experience, this may include persuading private sector infrastructure operators (notably, telecommunications companies) to play their role, for example. But there will be others. However, even knowing that there is a gap in your planning can be step forward. You can perhaps plan around that gap, and in the meantime mount a lobbying campaign to get them involved.
For those players that are on the team, however, there are two key considerations:
First – do you have the right organization and discussion forums in place? Not every player will need to be engaged to the same degree, but do you have the right mechanisms in place for the engagement that is required? Perhaps some kind of core group, with a surrounding coordination group might be the right tactic for your DRR team. Engagement will need to be regular, and in the case of community groups, small businesses and others, engagement needs to be managed as a continuous process to ensure that awareness and knowledge is maintained over time.
Second – do all team players share access to consistent data? Are they operating under consistent (and credible) assumptions about risks, and about how each other is preparing for, and how they could or would respond to a disaster? Without exception, every DRR workshop I have ever facilitated has revealed potentially critical shortfalls in this area – where conversations between various “players” were required but had not yet happened.
This article has attempted to identify who needs to be involved in disaster risk reduction (DRR) activities and how that engagement needs to be built and maintained. Each city and community, of course, needs to work out how best to do so in light of its own organizational configuration and its own circumstances.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
One of the most visceral manifestations of the combined problems of urbanization and climate change are the enormous wildfires that engulf areas of the American West. Fire behavior itself is now changing. Over 120 years of well-intentioned fire suppression have created huge reserves of fuel which, when combined with warmer temperatures and drought-dried landscapes, create unstoppable fires that spread with extreme speed, jump fire-breaks, level entire towns, take lives and destroy hundreds of thousands of acres, even in landscapes that are conditioned to employ fire as part of their reproductive cycle.
ARISE-US recently held a very successful symposium, “Wildfire Risk Reduction – Connecting the Dots” for wildfire stakeholders – insurers, US Forest Service, engineers, fire awareness NGOs and others – to discuss the issues and their possible solutions. This article sets out some of the major points to emerge.
Whether deep freezes in Texas, wildfires in California, hurricanes along the Gulf Coast, or any other calamity, our innovations today will build the reliable, resilient, equitable, and prosperous grid tomorrow. Innovation, in short, combines the dream of what’s possible with the pragmatism of what’s practical. That’s the big-idea, hard-reality approach that helped transform Texas into the world’s energy powerhouse — from oil and gas to zero-emissions wind, sun, and, soon, geothermal.
It’s time to make the production and consumption of energy faster, smarter, cleaner, more resilient, and more efficient. Business leaders, political leaders, the energy sector, and savvy citizens have the power to put investment and practices in place that support a robust energy innovation ecosystem. So, saddle up.
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).