Celebrating A Commitment To Collaborative Change

By Kim Chandler McDonald

Kim Chandler McDonald is an innovation and collaboration advocate/advisor, an FIA high-tech entrepreneur and a globally respected board member and thought leader on disruptive approaches, transformational trends and international business strategies - particularly those involving Enduser empowerment and the global DACE (Digital, Attention and Collaboration Economies. She is the award-winning author of Innovation: How Innovators Think, Act and Change Our World (2013) and Flat World Navigation, Collaboration and Networking: Building dynamic relationships in the global digital economy.

Oct 6, 2015 | Smart Cities | 0 comments

This blog post is a response to the Dear 2015 group blogging event prompt:

The year is 2050. Write a letter to the people of 2015 describing what your city is like, and give them advice on the next 35 years.

For more responses, see the Dear 2015 Event Page.

I write this letter still being astonished by how much we, Sydney-siders, have accomplished in only thirty-five years. Still, it is on this anniversary of our decision, as a community, to work together to create a successful, resilient collaborative society and economy, that I’m moved to write this letter to you, the Sydney-siders of 2015, who took it upon yourselves to Commit to Collaborative Change.

Firstly let me say: Congratulations! You are poised on a precipice, which saw you facing potential calamity: economically, ecologically and emotionally as divisions were increasingly, insidiously, making their way into the social norms of our, most beautiful, city.

Congratulations! You took stock of what might be and decided that, instead, you – as Citizen Endusers and as a city – would commit to working together to create a future, which worked with and for everyone who had, has and will have the opportunity to live here.

Making the decision to Commit to Collaborative Change was not easy, and certainly not something done lightly. It was clear from the outset that the commitment would mean that each member of the community would have to play an important part. As individuals and in groups, we were compelled to become engaged in all aspects of the life within our city which, prior to this, had been left as the purview of ‘others’, regardless of whether those perceived ‘others’ were governmental or NGO affiliations who had been, more often than not, left to their own devices.

Our decision to embrace collaborative change brought with it a responsibility to engage – with each other and with our representatives. The responsibilities were equally intangible – seen in the way we thought about ourselves, each other, and our relationship with our city – and intangible; there were things that needed to be done and we agreed to be accountable for them, together.

A Smart City That Engaged And Empowered All Its Communities And Citizens

The beginning came about with a realisation by our elected leaders that their relationship with us, their Citizen Endusers, was becoming ever more fraught and fractious. We were entering the era of the global DACE (Digital, Attention and Collaboration Economies) and yet it was only a fraction of us, at that time, who were able to truly engage and empower ourselves using the tools, technologies and techniques which had promised to engender positive change for everyone. What was necessary was the infrastructure to enable and empower the simple, secure accessibility of all of these applications so that each Citizen Enduser and Enduser group could make the most out of the opportunities promised.

We began the change with a number of trial projects, which are now central to the heart of the Sydney Community-Suite Spots underlying tools, technologies and infrastructure with which we live and thrive. Their numbers and uses are myriad, but perhaps those that shine brightest – as they bring positive outcomes to us each and every one of us on a daily basis – continue to include:

  • Tax breaks and grants, in place to support the innovative, capitalised research, which plays an integral part in city-wide construction of the extremely energy efficient structures we both live and work in.
  • Solar/hybrid technology incorporated into all public buildings and works projects including roads, bridges, tunnels, etc.
  • Fiscal penalties placed upon those ventures whose constructions are not energy efficient.
  • Petrol powered cars, within the city limits, being subject to fossil fuel surcharge
  • Free fuel cell top ups to solar powered (or other energy efficient/hybrid) vehicles within the city limits
  • Free public transportation
  • Carbon-neutral and carbon reducing endeavours receiving a range of tax breaks and free community engagement/promotion inducements, all of which equate to major fiscal benefits and positive promotion for any and all brands and businesses taking part.
  • Wearable technology, connected to the city-grid, which enables Sydney’s children to be outside and, while playing, collecting solar energy as well as creating energy from their own activity. This energy, as you well know, is easily and effectively, downloaded upon their return home to power their PlayStations, etc. As well as saving money and Sydney power, children are also given a tangible incentive to be active and, thus, healthier. (It should be noted that, in addition, this wearable technology – embedded in children’s clothing and linked to a GPS system only available to parents unless otherwise agreed – makes it much easier for parents to know where their children are and to find them if they go missing. Thus the excuse of ‘safety’ was removed from any historical answers as to why children were not outside being active.)
  • Sydney’s world-leading technological platforms, such as the Sydney Community-Suite Spots ‘One-Stop-Shop’, which ensured that remote/virtual workforces were, and continue to be, the norm, rather than the exception – meanw shat at least 70% of office workers can work effectively, efficiently and freely from home.

Along with its many government sponsored, free services such as city-wide, high speed wifi, Sydney’s world-first ‘One-Stop-Shop’ collaborative, online platform enables businesses, organizations and individuals to create and work together on city/Citizen Enduser focussed Joint Ventures securely, simply and inexpensively. All online, set up and incremental fees have been, since its inception, subsidised for as long as said project was deemed to have some semblance of profit – fiscal or otherwise – for the public good. Sydney-siders know these as a ‘Reinvention Projects’.

These ‘Reinvention Projects’ projects had their impetus in the realisation that (New) Gov 3.0 was not solely about politics which, at that time, was beginning the inevitable journey back from partisan to policy. Rather, (New) Gov 3.0 focussed on the enabling tools, technologies and techniques, which are now consistently used by Sydney’s engaged and empowered populace so that what was once perceived as being a disengaged ‘corporatocracy’ became known as a socially powered and powerful democracy.

This power and empowerment is best exemplified by an biannual participation Sydney-siders engage in. This is the call to participation, now turned to celebration, of Reinvention Projects wherein Citizen Endusers are encouraged to ‘think outside the box’ and make suggestions for positive change for the city – which are then voted on by all the cities Citizen Endusers.

Positive Collaborative Engagement With Carbon Neutrality

Projects which win the vote of the general public are given support, both fiscal, and otherwise – regardless of any partisanship; it is an election wherein the city’s municipal government has no veto. Since its inception, if Sydney’s Citizen Endusers deem a project positive for the city, the project is given support. Fiscally, ‘Reinvention Projects’ are paid for by the windfall hybrid-solar reinvestment revenue brought about once coal was no longer looked at as the main means to powering anything, including the economy.

Some of the local projects funded – and long applauded at local, national and international levels – were begun from an awareness of their global imperatives. Specifically, I note the work done following the realisation of the utter calamity bearing down on our global sector due to the rapid melt of the West Antarctica ice sheet.

Sydney-siders from all generations and walks of life have, for more than three decades, acknowledged the affects of climate change and rising sea levels. It was this awareness that led us to begin to adapt our foreshore and use leading edge technology to create 3D printed reefs barriers to protect our coastline. These reefs, part of our Community-Suite Spots, were designed to capture sea/wave energy which is still being used for powering Sydney’s infrastructure. In fact, no new public infrastructure can be built unless it can be included in the ‘pay-forward’ Community-Suite Spots scheme.

The beginning of this process found Sydney at the nexus wherein the Australian nation’s GDP, so long tied to the mining industry which was in free fall, began to move inexorably towards carbon-neutral clean technology. Sydney was at the heart of the Australian move to a mainly knowledge-based economy. As such the city was, and is, at the centre of the global Digital, Attention and Collaboration Economies (DACE) enabled by a engaging and empowering infrastructure of innovation and collaboration.

Yes, I am astonished by how much we have accomplished in thirty-five years. However, knowing the energy, enthusiasm and expertise which all came together to create the impetus for us to Commit to Collaborative Change I have no doubt that Sydney will continue to thrive in the sustainable, sublime future we share together!


Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

Encouraging Civic Engagement with What Matters Most to Residents

Encouraging Civic Engagement with What Matters Most to Residents

OurStreets origins are rooted in capturing latent sentiment on social media and converting it to standardized data. It all started in July 2018, when OurStreets co-founder, Daniel Schep, was inspired by the #bikeDC community tweeting photos of cars blocking bike lanes, and built the @HowsMyDrivingDC Twitter bot. The bot used license plate info to produce a screenshot of the vehicle’s outstanding citations from the DC DMV website.

Fast forward to March 2020, and D.C. Department of Public Works asking if we could repurpose OurStreets to crowdsource the availability of essential supplies during the COVID-19 crisis. Knowing how quickly we needed to move in order to be effective, we set out to make a new OurStreets functionality viable nationwide.

How Urban Industry Can Contribute Green Solutions for COVID-Related Health Disparities

How Urban Industry Can Contribute Green Solutions for COVID-Related Health Disparities

The best nature-based solutions on urban industrial lands are those that are part of a corporate citizenship or conservation strategy like DTE’s or Phillips66. By integrating efforts such as tree plantings, restorations, or pollinator gardens into a larger strategy, companies begin to mainstream biodiversity into their operations. When they crosswalk the effort to other CSR goals like employee engagement, community relations, and/or workforce development, like the CommuniTree initiative, the projects become more resilient.

Air quality in urban residential communities near industrial facilities will not be improved by nature alone. But nature can contribute to the solution, and while doing so, bring benefits including recreation, education, and an increased sense of community pride. As one tool to combat disparate societal outcomes, nature is accessible, affordable and has few, if any, downsides.

Crisis funding for public parks

Crisis funding for public parks

I spoke last week to Adrian Benepe, former commissioner for the NYC Parks Department and currently the Senior Vice President and Director of National Programs at The Trust for Public Land.

We discussed a lot of things – the increased use of parks in the era of COVID-19, the role parks have historically played – and currently play – in citizens’ first amendment right to free speech and protests, access & equity for underserved communities, the coming budget shortfalls and how they might play out in park systems.

I wanted to pull out the discussion we had about funding for parks and share Adrian’s thoughts with all of you, as I think it will be most timely and valuable as we move forward with new budgets and new realities.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

Sign up for our email list to receive resources and invites related to sustainability, equity, and technology in cities!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This