Why Are We Wasting So Much Water?
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
What is the most precious resource on earth? Gold, diamonds, or rare minerals? These items might come to mind first, but we can live without them. No, it’s water, something that every person needs to survive. Even though it is the most precious resource on earth, water is also a badly wasted and abused resource.
It’s interesting to note that although the earth is comprised of 70% water, people worldwide still don’t have access to enough clean and safe water to drink. As a matter of fact, freshwater makes up just 3% of the water supply, but less than 1% is freely available. The rest is tied up in in icebergs, glaciers, and snowcaps. This leaves us in the midst of what the United Nations is calling a “water crisis.” The issue is definitely not a lack of water, but a lack of clean water. In fact, millions of people die each year from preventable diseases, after drinking water from an unsanitary source.
Even in the United States, where water-borne illness is not a major concern, clean water supplies are finite and wasted water has negative consequences. Leaks can cause everything from rotten floors to mold infestations, to significant flooding events. Consumers pay higher bills; municipalities must create additional infrastructure such as dams and aqueducts that impact the environment.
Let’s look at the facts:
- 3.9 trillion gallons of water are consumed in the United States per month.
- More than one trillion gallons of water leak from U.S. homes each year.
- 10% of U.S. homes have leaks that waste 90 gallons, or more, per day.
- Every day leaking pipes lose an estimated 7 billion gallons of clean drinking water which would fill over 11,000 swimming pools.
- There is an $11 billion annual shortfall to replace aging water facilities in the U.S.
- Each year 240,000 water mains break in the U.S. ().
Measuring Lost Water
So now we ask, “How can someone allow their home to leak 90 gallons of water a day?” The problem may not be bad intentions or deliberate negligence, but rather bad measurement technology. Today’s mechanical water meters have poor accuracy, especially at low flow rates where they typically don’t register any flow at all. Over time the meter’s performance and accuracy degrade even further.
The minimum flow-rate requirement in the U.S. for cold-water meters is currently 0.95 liters per minute, which adds up to 1,363 liters/day. This requirement, established by the American Water Works Association (AWWA), has not changed since the first standard was proposed in 1921. Based on this standard, any flow below 0.95 liters per minute is measured as zero water use. Now it becomes clearer how a trillion gallons a year is lost and invisible due to leaks in U.S. homes.
Is there any good news?
Yes, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in partnership with U.S. utilities submitted a proposal to reduce water waste by lowering the minimum measured flow rates to 0.2366 liters/minute (0.01m3/hour). That is good progress, but today’s static mechanical meters cannot meet this improved standard. Fortunately, ultrasonic metering technology can easily measure the proposed lower flow rate.
Ultrasonic flow-metering technology can detect flow rates below 1 liter per hour, which is 60 times better than current U.S. standards. Ultrasonic flow-rate detection uses silicon connected to two piezo elements. A pulse is transmitted from one piezo sensor to the other, and the delta in pulse times of flight (i.e., how long it takes the pulse to travel from one sensor to the other) reveals how fast a liquid is flowing between the sensors.
This ultrasonic technology was once reserved for very expensive water meters used in water distribution systems or industrial flow-monitoring systems. However, advances in sensor technology and more integration of the silicon-based analog front-end (AFE) have made this technology economically viable for mass deployment of utility water meters. The yield forecast is a 10x improvement over today’s traditional mechanical meters.
Adoption of ultrasonic metering technology will enable the detection of very low flow rates to better identify leaks and water waste. So, what’s holding it up? A combination of public education and legislative pressure are needed to move society away from their grandfather’s water meters. The resistance to the rollout of smart electricity meters demonstrated what can go wrong when the public isn’t bought in to new technology, no matter how beneficial.
How can I learn more?
To see an example of an ultrasonic flow meter, visit Maxim’s REFDES70#: High Precision, Long Battery Life Heat/Flow Meter. This reference design is based on the MAX35101, a time-to-digital converter with an integrated AFE. It performs time-of-flight difference measurements on upstream and downstream ultrasonic pulses. The accompanying documentation includes a detailed explanation of how the flow rate is calculated using the ultrasonic measurements.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
This article was originally published on September 8, 2020.
Update for April 20, 2021:
After the murder of George Floyd we wrote this article as a kind of blueprint, a beginning to a new way of working with equitable resilience in our cities and beyond. Now, as the trial of Derek Chauvin comes to a guilty verdict in Minneapolis and the whole country reflects on the legacy of that verdict, we have to remember another senseless murder – another young Black man, Daunte Wright, at the hands of law enforcement, just miles from the courthouse. Again, Minneapolis is all of us. We have protested, we have voted. We stood up, we spoke out, we have raged about the anti-Black racism. We have seen people come together, we can feel a shift in this country. But there is so much more to do. No equity, no resilience.
-Ron & Stewart
Housing that is affordable to low-income residents is often substandard and suffering from deferred maintenance, exposing residents to poor air quality and high energy bills. This situation can exacerbate asthma and other respiratory health issues, and siphon scarce dollars from higher value items like more nutritious food, health care, or education. Providing safe, decent, affordable, and healthy housing is one way to address historic inequities in community investment. Engaging with affordable housing and other types of community benefit projects is an important first step toward fully integrating equity into the green building process. In creating a framework for going deeper on equity, our new book, the Blueprint for Affordable Housing (Island Press 2020), starts with the Convention on Human Rights and the fundamental right to housing.
Since the Great Recession of 2008, the housing wealth gap has expanded to include not just Black and Brown Americans, but younger White Americans as well. Millennials and Generation Z Whites are now joining their Black and Brown peers in facing untenable housing precarity and blocked access to wealth. With wages stuck at 1980 levels and housing prices at least double (in inflation adjusted terms) what they were 40 years ago, many younger Americans, most with college degrees, are giving up on buying a home and even struggle to rent apartments suitable for raising a family.
What makes it hard for policy people and citizens to accept this truth is that we have not seen this problem in a very long time. Back in the 1920s of course, but not really since then. But this is actually an old problem that has come back to haunt us; a problem first articulated by Adam Smith in the 1700s.