How to Move More People with Fewer Vehicles

By Anne Mellano, Cofounder of Bestmile

Anne Mellano is a cofounder of Bestmile, maker of a fleet orchestration platform for autonomous and human-driven vehicles.

Mar 24, 2020 | Mobility | 7 comments

Advocates of autonomous mobility are looking forward to the day when zero-emission, shared autonomous vehicles deliver services that dramatically reduce urban congestion and pollution. But as the mass deployment of autonomous vehicles seems farther and farther off, it is important to point out that we don’t have to wait for autonomy to realize many of the efficiencies that shared mobility can provide.

Trip optimization technology that can make shared transport work, whether it’s a computer or a human driving. One proof point can be found in an effort to make Boston’s public school buses more efficient. What can the humble yellow school bus teach us about efficient urban transport? Plenty.

In 2019, Boston’s public school district held a contest to find a solution that could better move its 25,000 students to more than 200 schools across 20 zip codes. Parents are allowed to select their children’s schools, so the transportation patterns are irregular. Further complicating matters is that schools have different start times. Student transit was costing the district $2,000 per student, 10 percent of its budget.

Researchers at MIT’s Operations Research Center rose to the challenge. They developed an algorithm capable of ingesting all ride requirements simultaneously, instead of optimizing service for each school independently. When treating each school independently, each bus was assigned to a specific school, sometimes bypassing stops for students attending nearby schools. The bus fleet service the entire network of schools. By optimizing the entire network, some buses dropped students off at multiple schools, treating schools as stops rather than as destinations. In short, the algorithm enabled the district to eliminate 50 buses, more than a million miles of driving, and 20,000 pounds of CO2 emissions per day. Student ride times and walking distances were not impacted. And the district now has $5 million per year in savings to invest in education programs.

Sharing the Future

Many have argued, including me, that the future of urban transport is electric, autonomous, and shared. I still believe this to be true. But the real key to traffic and pollution reduction comes from sharing. We don’t have to wait for the widespread adoption of electric and/or autonomous vehicles to achieve significant efficiency gains that remove cars and their emissions from city streets.

Multiple studies have found that shared autonomous vehicles can dramatically improve traffic.

  • An International Transport Forum (ITF) study of traffic in Lisbonfound that shared self-driving cars combined with the existing public transport system could reduce traffic by 90 percent with a maximum wait time of five minutes.
  • A University of Texas simulation of traffic in Austinfound that one shared autonomous vehicle could do the work of nine private autos with extra ride times of two to five minutes.
  • A study of traffic in Osloby the PTV Group found that shared autonomous vehicles could meet the city’s rush hour needs with just seven percent of today’s vehicles, and combining the services with public transport would reduce trip time by an average of 11 minutes.

Swap autonomous vehicles that operate on a computer with human drivers receiving instructions through a mobile app, and you can achieve the same results, albeit today with fossil fuel-powered cars. But reducing the number of vehicles on streets by as much as 90 percent would enable proportionate emissions reductions.

Public Benefits

Critical to the success of these models is the integration of services with public transport. The flip side of the equation would be shared services used in place of public transport, which would likely worsen congestion. Shared transport integrated with public mass transit would have to be mandated by cities rather than deployed as a free-for-all, like when peer-to-peer ridehailing services were introduced. Unregulated and unintegrated, these services have dramatically worsened traffic in most large cities.

Orchestrating Success

Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.

Orchestrating large fleets and processing large volumes of ride requests simultaneously and in real time, and dispatching vehicles and pooling ride requests in the most efficient manner possible are all extremely complex. The complexity grows as most urban environments are continually changing. Traffic, weather, special events, construction, and other conditions impact trip times and wait times.

Managing Space

Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility. With our climate crisis growing more acute by the day, we can and should start implementing shared mobility now.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

7 Comments

  1. This present world pandemic illustrates why big box transit or shared seat upholstery is not healthy. Rather than try to force people out of private vehicles perhaps just clean up the private vehicles and make them use 8X less energy. With a private EV the hardware is at your beck and call any instant you desire it. With shared vehicles there is always the drive time to go pick up and that cannot go away no matter the attempt by the software app. Sharing parts of the vehicle may be OK but not the breathable air portion and touch surfaces. Coronavirus stays in Cruise ships for 17 days long past their week-long passenger schedule. They spread disease from three boardings with a 17 day surface contamination life. With a shared car you spread disease among hundreds of humans with one 17-day contaminated surface. No amount of wiping surfaces with bleach will remove the pathogens from the air in these shared spaces. New York has thousands of infected persons already with no chance of actually stopping the spread. All they can do is count the dead from the older people and slow the spread to allow the hospitals time to tool up a little for the coming disaster.

    Reply
    • So what about air travel then? Should we all get a private jet too? :)

      Reply
    • The current situation with COVID-19 is dramatic but also shows that more flexible transportation systems are needed. Most of todays transportation systems are rigid. Fleet orchestration technology enables the switch in few minutes from a fully shared system to a system accepting only individual rides. For sure it does not make sense for big buses, but it does for smaller vehicles. Adaptability to unexepceted events is the key to the operation of a robust system.

      Reply
  2. Thank you for sharing this — this is really great research. I’ve often felt that while private cars are seriously inefficient, there’s something old fashioned about the way buses and public transportation is operated as well. This new technology for optimizing transit sounds like the right way to go.

    Reply
  3. Hello, good debate.
    you should search your browser for “e-MaaS”

    Reply
    • Thank you Jordi. For sure, electric mobility is also very important and impose new constraints (which are good to have) to fleet orchestration systems.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

Smart Cities & Public Health Emergency Collaboration Framework

Smart Cities & Public Health Emergency Collaboration Framework

Based on our observations and experiences, we’ve written a white paper describing a Smart City-Public Health Emergency collaboration framework. We define a structured approach to broadly consider and maximize collaboration opportunities between the smart city innovation community and municipalities for the COVID-19 outbreak. It integrates the CDC Public Health Emergency and Response Capabilities standards with components of a smart city innovation ecosystem. The CDC defined capability standards are organized into six domains. Each intersection in the framework represents a collaboration point where the smart city’s innovation ecosystem and digital capabilities can be used to augment the municipalities’ public health emergency response needs.

COVID-19 is Creating the Largest Ever Telecommunity, But Not for Everyone

COVID-19 is Creating the Largest Ever Telecommunity, But Not for Everyone

Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.

Planning for Arts and Culture in San Diego

Planning for Arts and Culture in San Diego

The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.  

Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.

Share This