$100k in Funding Available for Mobility Solutions
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
The City of Tomorrow Challenge is focused on Re-Imagining Mobility for People
Ideas are great. Technology is great. But if those new ideas manifest as products and services that don’t serve a need, then why make them? This is a question our City of Tomorrow Challenge team thinks about daily as we partner with Pittsburgh, Miami-Dade, and Grand Rapids to host innovation challenges that place residents at the center of mobility design and crowdsource new solutions that address their needs and local context.
This question came to life for me at one of our recent community working sessions where I met Jonah, a college student who leads a number of student organizations and is an advocate for at-risk populations especially those with physical disabilities. For Jonah, who has a physical disability himself, meeting people is both the hardest and most important thing he does. The inability to make an appointment because of lack of infrastructure to transport him or attend community meetings due to rigidity in on-demand transit scheduling is a barrier to him living out his passion for helping people.
How can new mobility technology, data and design help Jonah? How can it help the many others we’ve talked to – such as Sarah, a researcher in Pittsburgh, and Daren a returning citizen? These are the questions we’ve posed to our challenge community, focused on three key opportunity areas:
- Enabling smarter (or simpler) transportation choices
- Extending mobility options
- Encouraging walking, biking and busing
Over the last three months, the City of Tomorrow Challenge Team has been working to learn those experiences and pain points. We are using an approach that is rooted in insight and is developed by focusing on everyday people’s mobility experiences. Creating a baseline understanding of the environment we aspire to serve through existing data sources like transit ridership, income, age and other demographics. To add context to those data points, ethnographic interviews with transit riders help explain some of the insights and trends in the data. Riding with them on the bus or train and listening to them in their homes gives an intimate view into deficiencies that the systems we all rely on have.
Using Analytics and Research to Understand a Narrative
- Use analytics to create a solid baseline of understanding of macro trends
- Have in-depth conversations with people who have mobility struggles
- Generate novel or innovative solutions that meet needs
At every step of the process we are thinking, learning and designing with and not just for the end user.
I don’t want to rely on my boyfriend for rides to my doctor’s appointments… if I’m just physically worn-out and I can’t, then I’ll call him
For example, the Challenge team interviewed a number of people in their homes. Some of the stories really illustrate how people’s daily lives can be affected so significantly by their lack of access to resilient transit. For example, in Pittsburgh, a transit rider named Amy was at the mercy of the public system. She doesn’t own a car and also does not have a credit card so ride hailing was not something she could do. Walking was also problematic has she has limited mobility/ health issues and lives in a very hilly area of Pittsburgh. She spoke of the anxiety she has when she would go out as she was always unsure of what the day had in store for her, including if the she could make it up the hill near her house to the bus.
During community working sessions in Grand Rapids we discovered that invisible barriers cause people mobility stressors and sometimes they cope in ways that is invisible to the outside. Disabilities can be defined in many ways. Lowering the stress of using mobility can help people focus on their personal needs not just how they’re getting around. Derek spoke to this as his wheelchair made trips take significantly longer that they would without. The fact that the system didn’t always support door to door service creates a new stressor for him as now he would need to leave over an hour early to get somewhere on time.
There are people that amaze me with how they get around. Unable to use legs, arms, use a mouth stick. People that are blind and going to work. Disabilities have so many different faces and it’s so subjective, what exactly that is. – Derek
Our application period is open and these opportunity areas are manifesting in ideas submitted by residents, businesses, and community organizations that can impact cities and residents within them who need a shift in the current state of mobility. In the next phase of the challenge, we will select 10-12 semi-finalists per city and work with them to refine their solutions into potential pilot projects before selecting the final team(s) to win up to $100k to bring their idea to life.
The City of Tomorrow Challenge is made possible through the support and coordination of these organizations.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
This article was originally published on September 8, 2020.
Update for April 20, 2021:
After the murder of George Floyd we wrote this article as a kind of blueprint, a beginning to a new way of working with equitable resilience in our cities and beyond. Now, as the trial of Derek Chauvin comes to a guilty verdict in Minneapolis and the whole country reflects on the legacy of that verdict, we have to remember another senseless murder – another young Black man, Daunte Wright, at the hands of law enforcement, just miles from the courthouse. Again, Minneapolis is all of us. We have protested, we have voted. We stood up, we spoke out, we have raged about the anti-Black racism. We have seen people come together, we can feel a shift in this country. But there is so much more to do. No equity, no resilience.
-Ron & Stewart
Housing that is affordable to low-income residents is often substandard and suffering from deferred maintenance, exposing residents to poor air quality and high energy bills. This situation can exacerbate asthma and other respiratory health issues, and siphon scarce dollars from higher value items like more nutritious food, health care, or education. Providing safe, decent, affordable, and healthy housing is one way to address historic inequities in community investment. Engaging with affordable housing and other types of community benefit projects is an important first step toward fully integrating equity into the green building process. In creating a framework for going deeper on equity, our new book, the Blueprint for Affordable Housing (Island Press 2020), starts with the Convention on Human Rights and the fundamental right to housing.
Since the Great Recession of 2008, the housing wealth gap has expanded to include not just Black and Brown Americans, but younger White Americans as well. Millennials and Generation Z Whites are now joining their Black and Brown peers in facing untenable housing precarity and blocked access to wealth. With wages stuck at 1980 levels and housing prices at least double (in inflation adjusted terms) what they were 40 years ago, many younger Americans, most with college degrees, are giving up on buying a home and even struggle to rent apartments suitable for raising a family.
What makes it hard for policy people and citizens to accept this truth is that we have not seen this problem in a very long time. Back in the 1920s of course, but not really since then. But this is actually an old problem that has come back to haunt us; a problem first articulated by Adam Smith in the 1700s.