$100k in Funding Available for Mobility Solutions
The City of Tomorrow Challenge is focused on Re-Imagining Mobility for People
Ideas are great. Technology is great. But if those new ideas manifest as products and services that don’t serve a need, then why make them? This is a question our City of Tomorrow Challenge team thinks about daily as we partner with Pittsburgh, Miami-Dade, and Grand Rapids to host innovation challenges that place residents at the center of mobility design and crowdsource new solutions that address their needs and local context.
This question came to life for me at one of our recent community working sessions where I met Jonah, a college student who leads a number of student organizations and is an advocate for at-risk populations especially those with physical disabilities. For Jonah, who has a physical disability himself, meeting people is both the hardest and most important thing he does. The inability to make an appointment because of lack of infrastructure to transport him or attend community meetings due to rigidity in on-demand transit scheduling is a barrier to him living out his passion for helping people.
How can new mobility technology, data and design help Jonah? How can it help the many others we’ve talked to – such as Sarah, a researcher in Pittsburgh, and Daren a returning citizen? These are the questions we’ve posed to our challenge community, focused on three key opportunity areas:
- Enabling smarter (or simpler) transportation choices
- Extending mobility options
- Encouraging walking, biking and busing
Over the last three months, the City of Tomorrow Challenge Team has been working to learn those experiences and pain points. We are using an approach that is rooted in insight and is developed by focusing on everyday people’s mobility experiences. Creating a baseline understanding of the environment we aspire to serve through existing data sources like transit ridership, income, age and other demographics. To add context to those data points, ethnographic interviews with transit riders help explain some of the insights and trends in the data. Riding with them on the bus or train and listening to them in their homes gives an intimate view into deficiencies that the systems we all rely on have.
Using Analytics and Research to Understand a Narrative
- Use analytics to create a solid baseline of understanding of macro trends
- Have in-depth conversations with people who have mobility struggles
- Generate novel or innovative solutions that meet needs
At every step of the process we are thinking, learning and designing with and not just for the end user.
I don’t want to rely on my boyfriend for rides to my doctor’s appointments… if I’m just physically worn-out and I can’t, then I’ll call him
For example, the Challenge team interviewed a number of people in their homes. Some of the stories really illustrate how people’s daily lives can be affected so significantly by their lack of access to resilient transit. For example, in Pittsburgh, a transit rider named Amy was at the mercy of the public system. She doesn’t own a car and also does not have a credit card so ride hailing was not something she could do. Walking was also problematic has she has limited mobility/ health issues and lives in a very hilly area of Pittsburgh. She spoke of the anxiety she has when she would go out as she was always unsure of what the day had in store for her, including if the she could make it up the hill near her house to the bus.
During community working sessions in Grand Rapids we discovered that invisible barriers cause people mobility stressors and sometimes they cope in ways that is invisible to the outside. Disabilities can be defined in many ways. Lowering the stress of using mobility can help people focus on their personal needs not just how they’re getting around. Derek spoke to this as his wheelchair made trips take significantly longer that they would without. The fact that the system didn’t always support door to door service creates a new stressor for him as now he would need to leave over an hour early to get somewhere on time.
There are people that amaze me with how they get around. Unable to use legs, arms, use a mouth stick. People that are blind and going to work. Disabilities have so many different faces and it’s so subjective, what exactly that is. – Derek
Our application period is open and these opportunity areas are manifesting in ideas submitted by residents, businesses, and community organizations that can impact cities and residents within them who need a shift in the current state of mobility. In the next phase of the challenge, we will select 10-12 semi-finalists per city and work with them to refine their solutions into potential pilot projects before selecting the final team(s) to win up to $100k to bring their idea to life.
The City of Tomorrow Challenge is made possible through the support and coordination of these organizations.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
New mobility culture calls into question the commute and opens new options for city planning and commute patterns. Our study found almost two-thirds of Gen Z consumers would be willing to accept a longer commute in a self-driving vehicle. While the single driver commuter experience is generally perceived as bad, unhealthy, and stressful, the “we” commute of mobility culture could be a positive and healthy experience similar to today’s train commutes.
Using tools like algorithms and sensors, smart cities increase the quality of life for their residents, by making these communities cleaner, safer and healthier. When done thoughtfully smart cities efforts can also strive to make cities more inclusive and equitable. At the end of the day, it’s all about the people who live in these communities and making their interactions with city and/or county services easier and better.
Coordinated approaches are preferred for building urban drought resilience. Over the long term, a “trust but verify” policy can be more effective than the “better safe than sorry” approach of the mandate because the former encourages local suppliers to continue investing in diversified supplies. A good model is the stress-test approach the state adopted toward the end of the drought, which allowed local utilities to drop mandated conservation if they could demonstrate that they had drought-resilient supplies to last three more years.
In the wake of the drought, the state has adopted measures to improve information sharing, including a system for urban suppliers to provide regular updates on their supply situations. To encourage all agencies to prepare for more extreme droughts, urban water management planning documents must now address how suppliers would manage longer droughts.