Urban Revitalisation in Middle East Cities
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Over the past fifty years, development in the rapidly-growing cities of the Arabian Gulf has been based primarily on ‘greenfield’ development. Recently; however, investment is turning towards revitalization of existing urban areas. The drivers for this shift vary, from promoting cultural tourism to developing new models for citizen housing. Overall, the revitalization initiatives provide an opportunity to promote the sustainability and livability of the urban core and have the potential to catalyze a fundamental shift in urban lifestyles.
Dubbed “The World’s First Sustainable Downtown Regeneration Project”, the Msheireb Downtown Doha project is perhaps one of the first and most obvious examples of a revitalization project in the Middle East. Made possible by significant investment from the Qatari government, this project aims to provide a new model for sustainable, high-end living in Doha and the wider region. Through careful planning and design, the new mixed-use development aims to achieve the highest sustainability performance against international rating standards such as LEED® while remaining authentic to the region’s architectural heritage and culture and accommodating the sometimes-harsh local climate, particularly during the summer.
The project is car-free at surface level thanks to a development-wide basement providing parking and logistics access. Its central location will provide future residents and users with excellent accessibility and maximize their benefit from the upcoming public transport network, a clear advantage over other greenfield ‘sustainable cities’ in the region. Msheireb also aims to offer a more sustainable housing alternative by providing high-end, medium-density apartments as opposed to large detached villas, which are currently norm for subsidized citizen housing in the Gulf.
The first phase of the project is expected to be fully functioning soon and will provide an interesting case study on the impact of sustainable revitalization projects on urban behaviors and lifestyles in the Gulf. Of course, it will then also remain to be seen whether or not the sustainability performance can be replicated at a more affordable cost.
Culture, Tourism and Retail
Another example of an ongoing urban revitalization project in the region is the Marsa Al Seef project in Dubai. In the heart of ‘old Dubai’ the project aims to redevelop the underused waterfront into a culturally-themed hospitality destination. Sharjah is also focusing on restoring and revitalizing its cultural district: Heart of Sharjah. In addition to providing economic diversification opportunities through promoting tourism, these projects provide welcomed cultural attractions and strengthen the local identity of each city.
A revitalization project which has gotten many excited in Boxpark in Dubai. Similar to the original BOXPARK in Shoreditch, London this urban space is designed to be trendy and to focus on retail and food and beverage outlets. While outdoor shopping is the norm in London, it is a relatively new concept in Dubai, and Boxpark has helped demonstrate its attractiveness. It has also added some character to one of older and quieter neighborhoods in Dubai.
What from here?
The above projects are only the beginning. There is yet to be a comprehensive revitalization plan for any city in the region, as most cities are either in the process of developing plans or are focusing on easier greenfield investments.
What should a revitalization plan for a Middle East city look like? It should address the challenge of introducing walkability and effective public transport into existing urban cores, especially since most cities have been developed in the era of cheap oil and fascination with the motor car. This will require addressing both the land use mix and the transport network (e.g. road width, availability of shaded pedestrian walkways, integration of bus lanes and potentially rail). Providing accessible and functional public open spaces is another related challenge which could be a primary goal for revitalization projects. Of course, the spatial dimension will require a strong policy framework to assist in changing norms and behaviours, and generating finance for projects.
Large revitalization projects would also be an opportunity to address broad challenges such as city resilience. Whether it is adapting to climate change (e.g. sea level rise) or promoting a collective social identity, there are many fundamental topics to the long-term prosperity of a city which have been side-stepped by the focus on building new. This cannot go on forever. Creating communities where both citizens and expats of various income levels can live and work is possible, as was the case fifty years ago, in many Gulf cities.
Future revitalization plans also need to consider options for avoiding the full displacement of existing residents. This could perhaps be easier undertaken through smaller-scale infill projects, whereby empty or underutilized areas between existing large developments are developed. These projects could provide some of the much-needed open public space and community-scale facilities. Although not strictly an infill project, the Wadi Hanifah project in Riyadh demonstrates the value of a redeveloped natural public open space within a city.
What is stopping this revitalization from happening? For the larger projects, there are the political difficulties of re-appropriating land from private owners and negotiating land-use changes. The logistical challenges of construction in an existing area, particularly an existing busy downtown area, are also a barrier and can lead to theoretically feasible projects becoming “too difficult”. The biggest drawback is probably the availability of cheap, accessible land for new development.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Housing that is affordable to low-income residents is often substandard and suffering from deferred maintenance, exposing residents to poor air quality and high energy bills. This situation can exacerbate asthma and other respiratory health issues, and siphon scarce dollars from higher value items like more nutritious food, health care, or education. Providing safe, decent, affordable, and healthy housing is one way to address historic inequities in community investment. Engaging with affordable housing and other types of community benefit projects is an important first step toward fully integrating equity into the green building process. In creating a framework for going deeper on equity, our new book, the Blueprint for Affordable Housing (Island Press 2020), starts with the Convention on Human Rights and the fundamental right to housing.
Since the Great Recession of 2008, the housing wealth gap has expanded to include not just Black and Brown Americans, but younger White Americans as well. Millennials and Generation Z Whites are now joining their Black and Brown peers in facing untenable housing precarity and blocked access to wealth. With wages stuck at 1980 levels and housing prices at least double (in inflation adjusted terms) what they were 40 years ago, many younger Americans, most with college degrees, are giving up on buying a home and even struggle to rent apartments suitable for raising a family.
What makes it hard for policy people and citizens to accept this truth is that we have not seen this problem in a very long time. Back in the 1920s of course, but not really since then. But this is actually an old problem that has come back to haunt us; a problem first articulated by Adam Smith in the 1700s.
More than ever, urban transit services are in need of sustainable and affordable solutions to better serve all members of our diverse communities, not least among them, those that are traditionally car-dependent. New mobility technologies can be a potential resource for local transit agencies to augment multi-modal connectivity across existing transit infrastructures.
We envision a new decentralized and distributed model that provides multi-modal access through nimble and flexible multi-modal Transit Districts, rather than through traditional, centralized, and often too expensive Multi-modal Transit Hubs. Working in collaboration with existing agencies, new micro-mobility technologies could provide greater and seamless access to existing transit infrastructure, while maximizing the potential of the public realm, creating an experience that many could enjoy beyond just catching the next bus or finding a scooter. So how would we go about it?