Urban mobility is autonomous, connected, electric, and shared
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Tesla’s stock value is now worth more than Ford. GM and Tesla are fighting for the highest market cap and for leadership in cars and much more.
The future of urban mobility is ACES: Autonomous, Connected, Electric, and Shared. Professor Stefan Heck of Stanford University has been using ACES as a convincing model of future mobility.
For decades, we have used shared mobility in cities as we ride on buses, rail, and on-demand options including Uber, Lyft, taxis, shuttles, car pools, car rental, and car share. Most major cities have metro rail and bus systems that enable people to travel faster.
My wife and I recently used shared mobility for everything as we traveled from San Francisco to Whistler, Canada for skiing. We started with a bus, then Amtrak rail to Vancouver, then taxi, then bus to the resort. From there it was all walking, gondola, chair lift, and skiing.
When I worked in Massachusetts, I took the “T,” MBTA’s vast subway and light-rail system. Without these rail systems, those who drive would be stuck in gridlock for hours daily. If you leave Boston for New York, Philadelphia, or Washington D.C. take Amtrak’s popular Acela.
Of our shared choices, rail moves the most; cars the least, with buses in between. Rail is laid down into fixed routes that last 40 to 100 years, yet cities grow and reshape organically. When people exit transit one-quarter mile from their destination, most walk. But for one to three miles, on-demand services are needed. Smart cities have integrated services of rail, bus, on demand, bicycling and walking.
Almost 20 years ago, Toyota added an electric motor and advanced battery to a conventional car and introduced the hybrid Prius. With the success of hybrids, plug-in vehicles were introduced so that batteries could be charged from garage outlets to public chargers.
Over a million plug-in hybrids and pure electric vehicles are on the road. By 2025, Navigant expects 37 million electric vehicles (EVs) on the global roads, fueled by lithium battery costs falling from $1,000 per kWh in 2010 to $145 (GM’s price from LG Chem reports Car and Driver).
From electric cars to electric buses and electric rail, we are ending our dependency on oil-refined fuels for 15 percent efficient drive systems and transitioning to local renewable energy powering 90 percent efficient electric drive systems. The United States has already dropped from using 21 million barrels of oil daily to 19 million. As we electrify, we will continue to drop to zero. Mobility will be powered from wind and solar, not from the extreme emissions from shale drilling and pipelines tar sands, and oil from countries hostile to the United States. Millions of lives will be saved annually, now lost to lung damage from air pollution. Trillions will be saved in health care.
My wife and I have been driving electric cars for six years. We enjoyed our Nissan LEAF, which met 80 percent of our daily driving needs with 100-mile range on city streets and 60 miles on freeways. For long trips, we drove our hybrid or took rail. Range was rarely an issue because we had two cars. Now that we have only one car, we drive the Chevrolet Volt. The first 55 miles are from an electric garage charge, then it becomes a hybrid getting 40 mpg with a gasoline fill-up every 300 miles or so. Downsizing to one car, we rarely drive in our city of San Francisco, instead walking, using transit, and making some trips on our electric bikes.
Over six years, owning electric cars has cost us $225 per month, plus $35 per month to charge; our electric cars have cost us less than our former Prius to own, fuel, and drive. We charge from the California grid, which is 30 percent renewable and zero coal. Many EV drivers charge with the solar on their roof.
The University of California at Irvine, my alma mater, has ordered twenty all-electric buses from BYD, the world leader in making electric vehicles (sorry Tesla and Nissan). BYD is headquartered in China, where 800,000 EV sales are predicted for 2017. About 100,000 electric buses are now sold annually by a number of global manufacturers.
In China and most developed nations of the world, transit systems in major cities are connected with high-speed rail, which is pure electric. The planned 800 mile high-speed rail system for California will connect all major cities, 25 transit systems, and run on 100 percent renewables.
If you need a ride in Pittsburgh, open your Uber app and schedule a pickup. If your Uber car is a Ford Fusion with a 360-degree lidar system on the roof, you will be chauffeured in a self-driving car. By Pennsylvania law, the car will have a person behind the wheel, but they won’t touch the wheel unless there is a surprise situation. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick sees their future in self-driving vehicles.
Drivers kill over a million people annually, making the road unsafe for other drivers, bicyclers, and pedestrians. Self-driving cars see better using multiple cameras, lasers, and lidar. Self-driving cars are totally focused on driving; don’t text, bounce to music, drive after drinking, smoke dope, or get distracted.
Machine learning and big data will make full use of autonomous fleets during peak hours, routing them to the right places at the right times. In some cities, wireless charging will be used for the fleets of self-driving cars and shuttles. In others, the vehicles will drive themselves during off-peak hours to car washes and parking structures where they will be fast charged.
The benefits of self-driving are hotly debated. Transportation authority, San Francisco CTA, states that the on-demand services have made the streets of SF more congested. Indeed, independent drivers come into SF from other cities looking for gigs to make added money. CTA also worries that ride sharing will compete with its buses.
Other studies conclude that on demand leads to fewer cars and more transit use. After analyzing the data from 3 million taxi rides, MIT calculated that 2,000 on-demand 10-person vans in New York City could replace 14,000 taxis. MIT researchers also estimate that successful use of ride-share apps like Uber and Lyft could reduce the number of vehicles on the road by a whopping 75% without slowing down travel.
Put a price on carbon, congestion zones, and vehicle miles traveled during peak hours, and most urban transportation will not be solo drivers, it will be in electric and autonomous shared rides like Lyft Lines, Waymo and Waze (Alphabet companies) shuttle vans, autonomous buses and rail. Autonomous vehicles will save lives, insurance rates will drop, hospital bills will drop, urban housing will be more affordable without requirements of one and two spaces per unit. ACES mobility improves urban density.
When I listen to debates about autonomous vehicles, I am reminded of similar debates ten years ago about electric vehicles. EVs were predicted to add massive congestion, use nothing but coal power, eliminate jobs, and cause recessions by reducing petroleum demand. None of these alarming forecasts happened.
We were making a long and painful drive back from Los Angeles to San Francisco in heavy traffic. On the freeway, in the middle an empty desert my Android Auto navigation told me that I could save 37 minutes by taking the next exit. I was inclined to ignore the direction as an error, but I trusted Google Maps and took the exit. As we drove 12 miles on a windy side road, I looked at the I-5 freeway in complete gridlock, due to a major accident. After 12 miles, we were directed back on the freeway, indeed saving 37 minutes. Google could see the speed of thousands of Google Map users at that GPS location. In my Google Map settings, I had given permission to reroute me based on traffic information. Google’s sophisticated algorithms saved me valuable time.
There has been talk of autonomous mobility needing connectivity standards for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2X). Yet, autonomous vehicles are already in daily use without such standards. In the early years, the vehicles use high-resolution cameras, radar, and lidar to “see” everything around them.
What matters is connected people that use an app to be guided through interconnected services making best use of rail, transit, on demand services, and some healthy walking.
Leading cities are already using ACES – autonomous, connected, electric, and shared mobility. Pittsburgh has electric autonomous cars. Vancouver has electric self-driving Skytrain monorail. Today, no city is 100 percent ACES; tomorrow, ACES will be at the heart of smart cities. ACES bring us mobility that is safe, pollution free, healthy, and less expensive. Learn the details about Meeting of the Mind’s Boston Mobility Summit.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).
As extreme weather conditions become the new normal—from floods in Baton Rouge and Venice to wildfires in California, we need to clean and save stormwater for future use while protecting communities from flooding and exposure to contaminated water. Changing how we manage stormwater has the potential to preserve access to water for future generations; prevent unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and damage to communities; and increase investments in green, climate-resilient infrastructure, with a focus on communities where these kinds of investments are most needed.
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?