Urban Innovator of the Week: Tommy Pacello
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
The Memphis Medical District Collaborative (MMDC) is a community development organization supported by eight major anchor institutions operating in a two square mile area between Downtown and Midtown Memphis. Those anchor institutions are a collection of hospitals, universities, community colleges, medical colleges, biotech resources, and incubators, working collaboratively with the city, neighborhood organizations, local philanthropies, and other stakeholders.
“Our charge is to build back a community and neighborhood around these anchor institutions,” says MMDC President Tommy Pacello. “There are 270 acres of surface parking lots in the district. There’s a bunch of underused property. So how do we transform that into a vibrant lynchpin between Downtown and Midtown?”
Pacello is originally from Memphis and trained as an attorney and city planner. He has lived all over country but moved back to Memphis in 2012 to work for the Mayor’s Innovation Delivery Team, funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies as part of a five-city pioneer program – also including Atlanta, New Orleans, Chicago, and Louisville – focused on civic innovation and addressing the legacy challenges each of the cities face.
In Memphis, that meant issues of transit and mobility, improving public spaces, reducing blight and vacancy, growing existing businesses and attracting new ones, fostering a more efficient government, and addressing youth gun violence in neighborhoods that were designated as classically distressed, transitional, or upward-moving. In 2015 he was brought on by real estate and economic consulting firm U3 Advisors to develop the Anchor Strategy for the MMDC and was named President in January 2016.
He explains that Downtown Memphis has been undergoing a tremendous transformation over the last few decades, and Midtown has seen a lot of activity in the past few years in the wake of the Crosstown Concourse and Overton Square developments. The transformation of the Memphis Medical District – the “donut hole,” as he calls it, in the middle of these two growing areas – will act as a vibrant bridge between them.
And the area is ripe for it: Pacello says there are 24,000 employees and students in the Medical District. The anchor institutions have a $2.7 billion collective operating budget – of which $350 million is available to be spent within the community – with another $2.5-3 billion in planned capital investment and a projected 5,000 new jobs coming online in the next five years.
“It’s a really huge economic engine,” he says. “The challenge is that there’s really not a lot going on. The District lacks this cohesive sense of place. For many years it was this sort of donut hole – people would pass through it but didn’t want to spend any time in it.”
To address the question of, “How do we transform this?” the MMDC is taking a number of different approaches. Pacello describes the Collaborative as functioning as an intermediary between the anchor institutions and the community, allowing the institutions to keep their focus on healing, teaching, and research, while at the same time leveraging their resources – the people who work and study within these institutions and the real estate that the institutions own – to reposition the District.
“We think about the demand side and the supply side,” says Pacello. “The demand side is leveraging those people, dollars, and places.”
To do this, the MMDC is launching a “Live Local” program this fall, a housing incentive program for employees and students in the District modeled after successful programs in Detroit’s Downtown and Midtown.
In order to capture more of that $350 million in operating budgets available to be spent locally – of which only $50 million is currently staying in the Memphis economy – the MMDC is introducing “Buy Local” efforts in order to attract and create new local spend opportunities, with a focus on minority- and women-owned businesses.
The third prong of this demand strategy is “Hire Local,” a collaborative effort to strengthen workforce development pipelines in the District. After the MMDC asked all of the anchor institutions to project their hiring needs for the five years – an estimated 5,000 new jobs – many reported that natural attrition and a graying workforce is jeopardizing their talent pipeline. While Pacello emphasizes that the MMDC is a community development organization, not a workforce development organization, they can still assist in connecting workforce development with demand and bringing more people into the District to work and live.
In addition to demand, the MMDC also needs to meet supply, and this is where public realm and safety improvements come into play. Clean, well-landscaped streets, well-maintained public art, and placemaking initiatives are all designed to get people in the District out of their buildings and into the public spaces. Match-making grants for façade improvements and assistance in finding and securing vacant properties will also help attract small business owners into the neighborhood.
Another critical aspect and major concern for residents is safety, so the MMDC is coordinating monthly meetings with multiple police patrols and security teams, organizing community safety programs, and adding design features like additional lighting and security cameras.
Pacello says safety concerns are largely a product of the built environment and the negative perception people have of it.
“There is very little actual crime in District,” he says. “People are reacting to the built environment. There are fences around the campuses and open parking lots sending signals that the District isn’t safe.”
One strategy to combat the negative perception of the space is to program regular events in the District, like group bike rides, early morning runs, and food- and arts-based events to “begin to pull people out of those buildings.” Pacello explains, “We began thinking tactically about the small interventions that can be done without a lot of money – we can do pop-up events, we can offer small incentives to attract businesses, and we can serve as a Sherpa for small businesses navigating government.” He jokingly refers to the MMDC as the “Bureaucracy Elimination Bureau.”
The problem is not lack of residents – the Memphis Medical District is currently at 98 percent occupancy of its available residential housing. “A lot of supply is still needed,” Pacello says. “We’re trying to break up the monoculture by injecting in new residential product, new office and retail space, and creative businesses that weren’t set up in the District. We’re thinking about the District at a broad level and targeting real estate opportunities.”
Institutions tend to plan in siloes, he explains. Part of the idea behind the Collaborative is getting them together to think and plan district-wide: for example, a transit plan is not just transit for one employer; it’s a matter of getting all the employers on the same page to open up doors for transit plans that are networked together.
The same goes for real estate development: taking 110 acres of empty development sites owned by the institutions and connecting them to the real estate market to invite development.
“It’s great to create this economic sizzle,” Pacello says of his time on the Innovation Delivery Team, implementing small-scale strategies to generate economic vitality. “Now we need to take that and scale it up, and we now have the capital behind us to scale into a more lasting, permanent project.”
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).
As extreme weather conditions become the new normal—from floods in Baton Rouge and Venice to wildfires in California, we need to clean and save stormwater for future use while protecting communities from flooding and exposure to contaminated water. Changing how we manage stormwater has the potential to preserve access to water for future generations; prevent unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and damage to communities; and increase investments in green, climate-resilient infrastructure, with a focus on communities where these kinds of investments are most needed.
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?