Urban Innovator of the Week: Leslie Smith
Leslie Smith, President and CEO of EPIcenter Memphis, lived in Detroit her whole life. She previously worked with the Michigan Economic Development Corporation and was actively involved in an advisory role with the Living CitiesIntegration Initiative in Detroit, the Detroit Innovation District initiative launched by the New Economy Initiative of Southeast Michigan (NEI) and the Brookings Institute, and NEI’s NEIdeas business development grant program.
As President and CEO of TechTown Detroit, the city’s most established business incubator and accelerator, Smith was a key player in ushering in a new era for entrepreneurship in Detroit.
TechTown has been at the forefront of small- and large-scale business and economic development efforts, launching bootcamp-style entrepreneurship programs and innovative programs targeting the communities and populations too often left in the dust of economic expansion.
One of those programs, SWOT City, combined economic development and start-up acceleration strategies to transform historically underserved neighborhoods into vibrant and dense communities. Under Smith’s leadership, SWOT City was the first economic development program in Detroit to focus on marginalized communities and has come to define inclusive economic development efforts in the city, setting the standard for all other such programs to follow.
“SWOT City was the benchmark program in carrying out economic development to marginalized communities,” Smith says. “After seeing the bulk of the enthusiasm focused on the city center, we thought to carry those opportunities to the neighborhoods.”
Then, almost exactly one year ago, Smith was lured away from the city she helped reshape to Memphis, where she has taken all that she learned from Detroit and is implementing it as President and CEO of Entrepreneurship-Powered Innovation Center (EPIcenter) Memphis.
“The role of EPIcenter is catalyzing an entrepreneurship movement in Memphis that has been underway in the last decade or so but has not necessarily been connected in a networked fashion, or in a way that Memphians saw themselves as being part of the movement,” says Smith. “I can apply the things I’ve learned in Detroit to a very similarly situated city with some different conditions and opportunities than in Detroit, in particular in inclusive economic expansion.”
She laughs, “When you do something for a number of years learn what you should and shouldn’t do!”
With TechTown’s SWOT City, she says, they were “the first ones in” – “When we entered Brightmoor,” a divested community far outside the focus areas of investment in a rapidly redeveloping Detroit, “it was a pretty provocative move. In Memphis we’ve already sort of crossed those hurdles. We’re now finding programs that are working here and scaling them across the city. There is already real intentional investment in entrepreneurship within communities in Memphis that will allow us to accelerate those activities even faster than in Detroit.”
Smith says Memphis shares many of its more challenging circumstances in common with Detroit – high unemployment, high poverty rates, low education attainment, high crime rates. “But just like Detroit, that’s not necessarily the most productive national narrative – it’s not all the scary things you see on TV. I firmly believe the antidote is entrepreneurship and economic development,” she says.
EPIcenter Memphis is a program of the Greater Memphis Chamber’s Chairman’s Circle. It is a collaborative and community-wide strategic initiative coordinating resources from various organizations such as accelerators, incubators, mentors, investors, networking and technical assistance programs to help entrepreneurs conceive, launch, and scale businesses in the Memphis region.
Much of this work is being done by coordinating the efforts and resources of organizations already doing such work, and connecting all of them together as part of a single entrepreneurial ecosystem. Funding for this initiative is a cross-sector blend of corporate sponsorship, city and federal funding, philanthropic support, as well as seed funding from the founding agency, the Greater Memphis Chamber. The goal of EPIcenter is to create 500 companies and 1,000 entrepreneurs by 2024 through four areas of support: idea creation, development, funding, and growth.
“There were singular entrepreneurship assets or programs in Memphis already, but there was no sort of organizing hub for those activities,” Smith explains. “EPIcenter was created to be the key visioning and strategist effort for the entire entrepreneurial movement. It is responsible for the health and well being of the entire network. We’re working with over 65 partners across the city to make sure the entire network is functioning.”
Smith and her colleagues spent the first year understanding the people and players in the Memphis entrepreneurial ecosystem, identifying what the strong programs were and some of the gaps in the landscape so as to really map out the strategies that tied to the current conditions in Memphis. From there they focused on hiring their startup team, activating some new programs, and aggressively fundraising.
Although the first year was primarily a “year of discovery” for EPIcenter, it has already led to some new collaborations that hadn’t previously existed, including acitywide joint demo day, a “super accelerate” with seven accelerators from across the city hosting a joint event with breakout sessions, and it is also already scaling some established neighborhood-based entrepreneurship programs, like LAUNCH in Chattanooga which focuses on underrepresented and under-resourced communities.
“We have found some really active partners in the communities to help us double down on their work so they’re touching more people within their communities and helping us scale into communities that aren’t being touched,” Smith says. “As in Detroit, there are communities that receive a disproportionate amount of investment and other communities are always left out. We’re trying to make sure they’re not left out through the formation of a couple of tables through which we’ve started to talk about this portfolio of opportunities that are available in the community.”
The community partners already doing the on-the-ground work are invaluable to the success of EPIcenter, as are focused community engagement efforts. “You always have to build a program like this from the ground up; you can’t swoop in and try to prescribe for folks what strategies are best going to help them achieve their goals, and these tables will really help us to draw that out.”
The year of discovery is over, says Smith; this is the year of execution.
“In April we’re launching a $100 million fundraising campaign to really bring in capital and programmatic support over these next several years. We have added some talent programs that help us attack both ends of talent spectrum; we have expanded our tech acceleration programs; and we’re launching a new angel investment fund for the gaps that we identified. Now we can start having an impact.”
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.