The State of Smart Cities Down Under

By Matt Schultz

Matthew Schultz is National President of the Australian Smart Communities Association, a rapidly growing Australian peak industry association for Smart Community, Broadband and Digital Economic Development with members across Australia and New Zealand. He is also an inaugural Director of Open Data Australia, a member of Open and Agile Smart Cities Australia, Standards Australia IT­042 Internet of Things Standards Development Committee and the Internet of Things Alliance Australia Working Group 7 for Platforms and Interoperability.

Apr 16, 2019 | Governance | 6 comments

The development of Smart City strategies and initiatives is in full swing in Australia. Early on, the focus for cities was on next generation broadband rollouts, largely centred on the Australian National Broadband Network and 4G LTE, and digital economic strategies. Moving forward from there, the commencement of Smart City sensor network rollouts, connected infrastructure, and data driven transformation was kicked off by a number of leading Australian cities around 2015.

The advent of Smart Cities is not only focused on experimenting with the latest technology initiatives, but has been convened to address specific city and regional challenges and opportunities. The focus has been on transformational service and experience improvements, underpinned by digital technology for citizens, businesses, and tourists.

A recent snapshot survey of Australian Smart City activity undertaken by KPMG shows an increasing number of Australian cities and regions at the strategy and roadmap development stage, and also an increase at pilot projects phase. Interestingly, the survey shows a slight decrease in operational rollouts underway.

In terms of project planning, the same survey shows a continued emphasis on foundations of Smart City development. These aspects include connectivity and data platform development, and rollout of various city IoT including smart lighting, parking, and other infrastructure.

 

From KPMG ‘Smart Cities: A snapshot of Australia in 2018’ https://home.kpmg/au/en/home/insights/2019/01/smart-cities-snapshot-australia-2018.html

 

Evidence of progress by the leading Cities in Australia include the recognition of the cities of Melbourne, Ipswich, and Sunshine Coast by the Intelligent Community Forum, a New York based think tank that analyses the various practices that create Intelligent Communities. The City of Adelaide has also attracted international acclaim for its Ten Gigabit Adelaide fibre network rollouts and other related Smart City initiatives.

The Australian Government has been active in recent years to catalyse the development of Smart Cities through its ‘City Deal’ and ‘Smart Cities and Suburbs’ program.

The City Deals announced for Western Sydney, Launceston and most recently South East Queensland have substantial Smart City, Digital Technology and service delivery transformation components. The opportunity to create multi-jurisdictional approaches to over come barriers and cut red tape to catalyse very significant transformational development of these large regions and cities will be closely watched.

Significant funding from the Australian Government through the Smart Cities and Suburbs program has been granted to a large number of Cities and Regions to commence Smart City initiatives, however it remains to be seen of the long-term success, sustainability and scalability of these.

The State Government sector within Australia has been slower to play a leading role in Smart City development within Australia. However, the New South Wales State Government through it’s agency Infrastructure NSW is developing a State Government led Smart City development strategy and framework which could, if successful, provide a template for partnership, access, regulatory and governance outcomes to achieve optimal smart city developments with City and Regional Councils.

As President of the Australian Smart Communities Association, I was recently privileged to attend the Smart Cities Expo World Congress in Barcelona in November 2018. This opportunity allowed me to benchmark Australia’s progress in Smart City ecosystem development and how we compare to our international peers in North America, Europe and Asia.

The following points sums up my thoughts about what I saw and how this aligns with Australia’s progress:

 

‘Call to arms Narrative’ – Much of the international dialogue is still focused on call to action to commence the smart city journey, planning and implementations.

 

Greater focus on the bigger picture and unintended consequences – A number of keynotes were focused on how the impact digitised globalisation is changing the current landscapes of democracy, government trust and the breakdown of decades old norms. Importantly there are emerging models that can be implemented to ‘fix the future’.

 

Evidence of fulfilling the promise of Smart Cities – There is still only small, but growing, evidence of scaled projects that have produced the transformational outcomes sought. Most Cities are in planning, proof of concept or pilot stages in 2018.

 

Scaled Smart City rollouts – Some of the larger international cities such as Barcelona has long been the ‘poster child’ of the smart city movement over the past decade. Most of these cities have been marketed to indicate that their respective smart city rollouts are near or at completion. Deeper investigation shows that this is not the case with even Barcelona still around 10% to 15% of whole of city scale smart infrastructure rollout.

 

Where Australia is positioned – Based on what I experienced and saw on this important trip it is clear that Australia’s leading cities are at pace with nearly all international peers.

 

However, this could change rapidly if more Australian Cities do not convert current strategy into commencement of on the ground implementation in the coming 12 months and sustain focus on achieving long term city and region service and experience transformation.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

6 Comments

  1. Indeed very well drafted Matthew.
    The backbone of any smart city is the Telecom infrastructure followed by the platform which controls all the devices and sensors on the network.
    I am however not convinced of the fact that lighting comes all the way down, as one of the biggest concern to a city council is the utility bill.
    Lets discuss this soon.

    Reply
  2. Want to connect with author Matt Schultz on his recent paper in Meeting of the Minds about the Smart Cities down under (Australia) as I am doing a book now on Sustainable Mega Cities (and communities) and do not have anyone doing a case (short 8-10) or chapter (long 20-30 pages). A chapter for the book would be great as there will be a series of books and maybe a journal on this topic. Do get in touch with me at my academic university below and see my private company website too (Clark Strategic Partners). Hope to hear from Matt soon. Woody

    Reply
  3. Full kudos to you Matt (and to ASCA) for calling out the fact not the fantasy –

    “There is only small…evidence of scaled projects that have produced the transformational outcomes sought. Most Cities are in planning, proof of concept or pilot stages” and “Some of the larger international cities (have) been the ‘poster child’ of the smart city movement over the past decade. Most of these cities have been marketed to indicate that their respective smart city rollouts are near or at completion. Deeper investigation shows that this is not the case”

    I think the “Smart City Universe” will achieve better progress by acknowledging that this is indeed a long journey with many potential detours – some of which may be dead-ends – than by hyping ourselves into thinking that we are ‘nearly there’. Australian cities/communities may also earn the respect of stakeholders elsewhere in the world if they adopt this evidence-driven approach.

    Reply
  4. Hi Matt,
    You may have also heard about the great things being done by City of Newcastle and the broader region on Smart Cities. Newcastle and Lake Macquarie have invested their own resources and been successful in gaining large grants from both the State and Federal governments under the programs you have mentioned in this article. What’s happening in Newcastle and the broader region is a great example of how Smart City Programs can help transition regional cities into the new economy.
    https://www.newcastle.nsw.gov.au/smarter-living
    https://shape.lakemac.com.au/smart-city

    Reply
  5. Gautam said telecom Infra needs to be available I do not see that as what makes a smart city LoRaWan is here to stay and does not need a full Telco model to run LoRawan. Now what is smart! I see savings in utilities as being smart, so streetlight dimming and water NRW are two areas to start. Personal smart is not CITY we have apps for everything so that’s available. Monitoring motors for efficiency and maintenance through smart sub meters I promote that device thru my company for Malaysia. Parking is helpful but may end up a revenue annoyance. CCTV if MANNED can be helpful but is not necessarily a preventative system. Traffic light management in a cit during peak period would be helpful to public transport (Bus and tram) and co-ordinate with train crossings.
    These things are smart in my opinion please come up with a checklist that is really aimed at smart

    Reply
  6. An Interesting article about smart city in Australia. I’m the CO-Founder of the Israeli Smart Cities Institute and would like to meet you in Barcelona where i’m a speaker for the last 6 years.

    Australia is a very interesting case for smart city policy and implementation. I wonder how I can participate in the next Australia smart city expo?

    I would appreciate establishing friendly and professional contacts.

    Dr. Zvi Weinstein

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

A Breakdown of San Francisco’s Affordable Housing Crisis

A Breakdown of San Francisco’s Affordable Housing Crisis

There is a definitive need for affordable housing programs for low-income households. But there is also clearly a need for housing assistance for people earning up to and beyond the city’s median income. When available funds and programs don’t align well with defined needs – and there is simply not enough money to solve the problem, the housing affordability challenge can seem insurmountable. If there is a silver lining to the current state of housing in the Bay Area, it’s that the affordability crisis has served as a much-needed call to action. Under a regional framework known as the 3Ps (production, preservation, and protections), new programs that seek to facilitate new housing construction, preserve existing affordable housing, and to enact tenant protections have been tried, tested, funded, and legislated at the local, regional, and state levels.

How Gen Z Impacts Urban Mobility

How Gen Z Impacts Urban Mobility

New mobility culture calls into question the commute and opens new options for city planning and commute patterns. Our study found almost two-thirds of Gen Z consumers would be willing to accept a longer commute in a self-driving vehicle. While the single driver commuter experience is generally perceived as bad, unhealthy, and stressful, the “we” commute of mobility culture could be a positive and healthy experience similar to today’s train commutes.

MetroLab’s 10 Principles for Government + University Partnerships

MetroLab’s 10 Principles for Government + University Partnerships

Using tools like algorithms and sensors, smart cities increase the quality of life for their residents, by making these communities cleaner, safer and healthier. When done thoughtfully smart cities efforts can also strive to make cities more inclusive and equitable. At the end of the day, it’s all about the people who live in these communities and making their interactions with city and/or county services easier and better.

Share This