Tesla and SolarCity: Harbingers of Future Mobility and Energy
In Leonardo DiCaprio’s new documentary film, “Before the Flood,” DiCaprio walks the floor of Tesla’s new Gigafactory while he talks with Elon Musk about the future of energy and mobility. Elon Musk is a brilliant visionary. As CEO of Tesla, he has made a reality of his vision of electric self-driving cars. He is also Chairman and a major shareholder of SolarCity, the leader of solar-as-a-service. With no money down, in sunny areas, solar can be added to the roof of a home or building and the electricity bill lowered.
On November 17, Tesla and SolarCity shareholders finish voting to approve Tesla’s purchase of SolarCity (disclosure: I own stock in SCTY). By combining the companies, Musk is convinced that he can transform mobility and energy:
“The acquisition of SolarCity will create the world’s only integrated sustainable energy company, from energy generation to storage to transportation. Just as Tesla has demonstrated the superiority of electric vehicles, the solar roof and Powerwall 2 will transform energy generation and storage.”
Executives of other car companies are stunned with the success of electric cars and ridesharing. General Motors is valued at more than Tesla, but less than Uber. Every auto CEO that wants to keep her job is now serious about electric cars and self-driving.
Executives of big electric utilities watch with similar apprehension as solar-plus-storage threatens their central-power-plant monopolies. Yes, there is a war on coal, and it’s being won by solar, wind, storage, and natural gas.
SolarCity has been on the winning side of the energy war; Tesla on the winning side of mobility. Together they will help create a brighter future with cleaner air, less climate extremes, reliable and affordable energy, safer and faster mobility. The combined company would design, manufacture, sell, install, service, finance, and offer on-demand energy and mobility.
Such ambitions require more billions of dollars, as both Tesla and SolarCity burn through billions as they rapidly build their businesses. Stock analysts debate about whether Tesla stock is a buy or a bet on a company doomed to failure. Top Wall Street analyst, Oppenheimer’s Colin Rusch, opines that after the merger Tesla would need $12.5 billion through 2018 raised with a combination of asset-based debt, system refinancing, tax equity and corporate debt. Yet, this October Tesla surprised Wall Street with a profit and Musk claims that no new cash need be raised.
Tesla Electric Cars and Gigafactories
More than one million electric vehicles are now on the road.
By December 2015, Tesla delivered 100,000 electric cars that average around $100,000. Soon they will have delivered a total of 200,000. These luxury cars are beautiful and have electric ranges of at least 250 miles per charge.
Tesla has deposits for 400,000 new Model 3 electric cars, which start at $35,000 with tax credits. Model 3 is the most successful product launch in history. No other product has this quickly garnered orders worth over $10 billion, not the computer, the television, or the iPhone.
For an added $8,000, any new Tesla can include the option to be fully self-driving, for example, driven from Washington DC to New York without ever touching the steering wheel from garage to parking lot. Tesla is the leader in electric cars, self-driving cars, connected cars, and luxury cars. BI Intelligence expects, “94 million connected cars to ship in 2021, and for 82% of all cars shipped in that year to be connected.”
The Tesla Gigafactory is the largest battery-manufacturing site in the world. Based near Reno, Nevada, the factory is bigger than any in Japan, Korea, or in China. By 2020, the factory is projected to produce 35 GW of lithium battery cells and 50 GWh of battery packs for cars, solar homes, and buildings to optimize energy use.
Thanks to economies of scale, electric cars keep getting less expensive to make. They are already less expensive to fuel and operate than conventional vehicles. I have never spent over $35 per month fueling my older Nissan LEAF or new Chevrolet Volt. Some will buy these electric cars, others lease, and many will use them in ridesharing services from Uber, Lyft, and new competitors like Tesla.
Tesla is also a computer science company, with years of millions of lines of software code to optimize the many computers within a car, gigabytes of big data, and deep learning that enables self-driving. This core competency in computer science will also help the new combined company go beyond batteries into intelligent energy management and to compete with Uber in mobility on demand.
SolarCity and future of solar + storage
SolarCity has installed solar roofs on more than 300,000 homes and commercial rooftops. The homeowner often makes no down payment, instead agreeing to a power purchase agreement or lease. Some of these existing customers and many new customers are also interested in battery storage, car charging, efficient hot water heating, and home energy management.
Tesla recently unveiled Powerwall 2, a new 7 kW, 14 kWh battery system priced at $5,500 with integrated solar inverter and electric vehicle charger. Tesla technology will accelerate the installation of solar plus storage, all electric homes, and zero net-energy homes.
Most homes use natural gas for heating, hot water and cooking. As I discussed in my article “Unnatural Gas,” natural gas is methane, a greenhouse gas that traps 25 times the heat of CO2. From fracking, to storage, to pipeline delivery, leaks are damaging our future. It is too expensive to ship methane to Hawaii, so all-electric homes are the norm. In the islands, SolarCity is installing solar roofs combined with Tesla battery storage, electric smart water heaters, and Nest thermostats to manage efficiency.
Solar plus storage will be at the heart of zero net-energy (ZNE) homes, buildings and communities. Starting in 2020, new single-family homes in California must be ZNE. Starting in 2030, new commercial buildings, including apartments, in California must be ZNE. California, by law, will get 50 percent of its energy from renewables by 2030. ZNE is a major opportunity for the combined Tesla.
Tesla, in partnership with Panasonic, has ambitions to complete a massive solar factory in Buffalo, New York, that would make one GW of solar annually, with ambitions to scale to 10 GW to make it the world’s largest solar manufacturing site.
Tesla recently generated interest with new roofing material that integrates solar. Instead of solar mounted on a roof, your roof would be solar. Yet, as Tesla enters the solar integrated roof business, Dow Chemical leaves the solar shingle business. So far, many attempts at building-integrated photovoltaics have failed to make money and failed to generate the energy per square-foot of conventional solar.
A solar roof is a compelling vision. Initial success might be in luxury homes and projects with ambitions for architectural awards where cost and PV efficiency are secondary. In the U.S., five million new roofs are installed annually; two percent is 100,000 solar roofs annually. Add solar-plus-storage, and we accelerate ZNE homes and buildings.
The Future of Energy and Mobility
In the future, our homes, buildings and cars will be completely electrified, smart, and powered with renewable energy. An electric car is 90 percent energy efficiency, compared to 15 percent for a gasoline car. New electric homes will increasingly be zero net energy, incorporating solar power, smart electric water heating, an advanced battery, and intelligence everywhere.
By acquiring SolarCity, Tesla is building a company to supply our smart electric future. No doubt that it may hit a cash crunch in pursuing its ambitions. Competition will be intense. Who ever wins as our suppliers, all of us will win with smart electric cities where it is easier to travel between our zero net-energy homes and ZNE places of work.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.