Stakeholder Engagement in Santiago: Chile’s Energy Future
The phrase “stakeholder engagement” does not exist in Spanish. And yet, in January of 2014, a group of 12 MBA and MPA students from Presidio Graduate School, myself being one of them, traveled to Santiago for a stakeholder engagement project, focusing on Chile’s energy future.
Chile is one of the strongest economies in South America and has experienced rapid economic development. Radical economic reform in the 1970s gave rise to neoliberal economics. Largely influenced by Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics, Chile transformed into a privatized, deregulated economy. While the economy has boomed, short-term growth is matched by long-term challenges — especially in the energy sector.
Currently, most of Chile’s energy comes from imported fossil fuels. In 2004 when Argentina began cutting oil exports to Chile, prices skyrocketed. This event has left a visceral imprint on the Chilean psyche, and the country is looking for a more secure energy future.
However, due to rapid economic development, Chile’s growth is outpacing its ability to supply energy. This set the stage to tap into the country’s natural resources as a source of energy. In 2011, the HidroAysen megaproject was approved, an enormous endeavor to build 5 hydroelectric power plants across 2 rivers in the south of Chile. The impacts of the HidroAysen on Chile’s pristine environment would be irreversible, flooding an estimated 14,500 acres of natural reserves, requiring the relocation of certain indigenous communities, and the building of transmission lines from Aysen to Santiago. Protests for the project were widespread and with the HidroAysan held up in courts, key investors began to pull out. With this backdrop, the Presidio Team set out to understand what a sustainable, secure energy future might look like for Chile.
Presidios’ International Sustainability Club laid the groundwork for the project in the six months prior to the trip. Research was conducted on Chilean energy markets, energy policy, and Chilean culture. All team members tapped their networks to identify contacts in Santiago. Ultimately, research on stakeholder groups was split into five categories: government, energy producers, energy users, affected local communities, and advocates. On January 4th, we commenced a series of targeted interviews over the course of two weeks. By luck, preparedness, or charm, we managed to conduct over 25 interviews across all 5 stakeholder groups in 10 days time.
Preparing for the project, we recognized that going into a foreign country with a foreign energy market and a foreign language (Chilean Spanish is infamous for being difficult to understand) there was a lot we didn’t know. Our goal was simply to listen and aggregate as many stakeholder perspectives as possible. What we did know was that our Presidio MBA training, focused on public-private partnerships, systems thinking, and triple bottom line accounting, created an opportunity for us to provide a fresh perspective.
Underlying Conditions for Success
There were three main factors that enabled us to smoothly carry out this seemingly ambitious project. First, Chilean government officials were willing to meet with us and connect us with professionals within their network. By the time we were ready to leave Chile, we had a large number of warm introductions into the Chilean energy industry. Second, was the openness of Chilean culture. Most interviewees came by harsh or blunt opinions openly and honestly, making our job at gathering information much easier. And thirdly, is the fact that currently, stakeholders are not integrated into Chile’s decision-making process. This has created a strain that is felt both by the government and by citizens. In fact, many protests to the HidroAysen project were critiques of lack of transparency in the decision making process. Without including stakeholder opinions, decisions are top-down and not well received by the public. Because of this context, we realized that our work to bring stakeholder voices into the conversation on national energy was quite valuable.
Indigenous Community Engagement
Indigenous communities make up 4.6% of Chile’s population, 85% of whom are from the Mapuche tribe and predominantly live in rural Southern Chile. In an attempt to understand the Mapuche communities’ priorities around energy, I traveled with some of my colleagues south to the town of Osorno. There we met with the director of an ecotourism company, Mawidan, who works closely with Mapuche communities. We also met the head of communications for the Mapu Lahual Indigenous Association in the town of Puaucho. Luckily, we had arrived just in time to learn about a brand new solar energy project being piloted in the region.
Most rural communities have gas-powered electricity but because prices are so high, they rarely use it. To solve for this, the rural municipal office in Puaucho proposed setting up distributed solar energy. An impact study conducted by Andes Mainstream SPA showed that indigenous communities are receptive to renewable energy projects that have little environmental impact. Since solar installations are minimally invasive compared to hydro, wind, or geothermal, the Puaucho municipal office proposed it as a viable renewable option. The project enables farmers to purchase and install solar panels that are 80% funded by the government and 20% funded by the farmer, providing affordable electricity. So far, there are about 40 solar projects going on in the Lakes District, all of which were installed in 2013.
Chile’s top priority is to continue its path of economic development, which requires cheap energy. A Renewable Portfolio Standard Law was passed in 2013, requiring 10% of energy sold to come from renewable sources by 2024. However, the mindset of most stakeholders we talked to is that cheap energy is the priority, regardless of where it comes from. Chile is plotting along under neoliberal economic practices, with engineers and economists being the chief decision makers. But in order to realize sustainable development along with economic growth, the country needs to integrate the priorities of all stakeholders into its strategy for a secure energy future.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.