Smart Procurement for Smart Cities

By Jeremy Devray-Benichou

Jeremy Devray-Benichou is VP of Customer Success at urbanleap.io.

Feb 11, 2019 | Governance | 3 comments

With limited resources and little room for failure, choosing the right procurement strategy has been crucial for US cities to stay ahead of the innovation curve. Standard procurement processes are restrictive. They take time and lack the flexibility required to change and adapt specifications to the reality of the problem they are trying to solve. Searching for the right partner through a competitive RFP process may not even make sense when looking for a solution that does not exist yet. As a result, some cities end up purchasing technologies that are out-of-date or out-of-scope.

On their end, innovators willing to work with local governments know that talent and motivation are not the only keys to success. Patience and persistence are also required to crack the procurement process. This is even more accurate for early stage startups that lack the experience and references often required to participate in a competitive bidding process. They’re dealing with the same problem job seekers are facing when searching for their first job in a market that values experience. Who’s willing to take the risk and give them a first chance?

The necessity to provide a flawless framework to attract startups and test technologies in a low-risk environment before moving to full scale (through RFP for instance) has encouraged innovative cities to think differently. A solution has emerged with modularity. By breaking down the procurement process into pieces, local governments have been able to dedicate more attention to the first and most critical stage of the procurement process; the selection of a relevant technology.

By calling on vendors to test and demonstrate their solutions at a small scale before moving to RFI or RFP, cities have been able to gain flexibility and agility, identify failures earlier, and make the whole experience of working with local governments much smoother. For the innovators, small-scale experiments (a.k.a. “pilots”) are an opportunity to demonstrate their ability to solve real-world problems with real-world solutions. It allows them to collaborate closely with the cities in creating the specifications for a future product or solution.

One of the forerunners of this approach is Kansas City, Missouri. Through its Innovation Partnership Program, Kansas City has created a sandbox environment to enable innovators to showcase their solutions before embarking on the long and uncertain procurement journey. For the City, the advantage is two-fold. It minimizes the risks associated with the adoption of new solutions, and it also gives the City access to new technologies at no cost. In return, Kansas City grants access to the city data and infrastructure to the IPP’s participants.

“Kansas City has a strong entrepreneurship history”, recalls Bob Bennett, Kansas City’s CIO. “Our Innovation Partnership Program (IPP) is a city tool that allows us to continue this tradition. We welcome companies into City Hall to validate an entrepreneur’s business plan or product. When it works well, as it did with Xaqt and RFP 365, the technologies make an immediate impact on Kansas City and rapidly expand to other communities”.

Urban labs and innovation programs are a great way to minimize the risks associated with the traditional contracting process. It’s also a good way to attract innovative vendors to small communities who have limited access to innovative startups and huge problems to solve. With a population of almost 80,000 and a very extended network of 500 miles of roads and streets, the city of Palm Coast, Florida is turning to the private sector to bring innovative solutions to problems related to pedestrian safety and to general walkability, through testing and experiments.

Modularity is only solving part of the problem. The city of Pittsburgh, which has been at the edge of public-private partnership for innovation through its urban lab called the PGH Lab, wants to go a step further. Its leadership wants to bring data into the picture to evaluate proposals next to each other and inform the decision process. To achieve this objective, PGH Lab entered a partnership with UrbanLeap, a Palo Alto based company leader in innovation management, to plan, track and evaluate the selected pilots. Through its cloud-based platform, UrbanLeap offers a collaborative space to Pittsburgh and the vendors to engage and collect strategic data.

For Annia Aleman, City Innovation Specialist for the City of Pittsburgh and Manager of PGH Lab, “the platform is playing a major role in bringing transparency to the process, helping the city track and measure the progress of the pilots in real time”.

Cities are not the only local governments to encourage experiments as a first step to purchase innovative solutions. The County of San Mateo in the Bay Area has created its own urban lab—SMC Labs—which aims at addressing complex regional issues that span across cities. But the county of San Mateo is facing another type of challenge. Strategically located at the heart of the Silicon Valley, the county is overwhelmed with a flow of unsolicited proposals. To handle the situation, the county is also using UrbanLeap’s Opportunity Management toolkit to structure and improve the process of collecting, reviewing and evaluating the proposals.

While more and more US cities are competing for the title of Smart City, adapting the procurement process to today’s challenges is key. But calling on startups to demonstrate their solutions is not enough. It also requires structured workflows and data-driven solutions to successfully test and evaluate the solutions of tomorrow.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

3 Comments

  1. Excellent article and great information as a former city CIO it was on target.

    Reply
  2. This article is a good primer on the biggest obstacle facing the public sector in their attempt to procure “smart” technology.

    Eventually, however, we need to stop talking about “Smart Cities” and focus on solutions for the entire region. Regional procurement allows smaller jurisdictions to participate even if they lack the sophisticated procurement personnel necessary to acquire a complex technology.

    It will also provide lower overall costs if volume matters to the vendors. Lastly, it will ensure the solution is consistent across all the political subdivisions in the region which will result in greater citizen (voter) satisfaction.

    Reply
  3. The Article is really amazing. just love it. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

A Breakdown of San Francisco’s Affordable Housing Crisis

A Breakdown of San Francisco’s Affordable Housing Crisis

There is a definitive need for affordable housing programs for low-income households. But there is also clearly a need for housing assistance for people earning up to and beyond the city’s median income. When available funds and programs don’t align well with defined needs – and there is simply not enough money to solve the problem, the housing affordability challenge can seem insurmountable. If there is a silver lining to the current state of housing in the Bay Area, it’s that the affordability crisis has served as a much-needed call to action. Under a regional framework known as the 3Ps (production, preservation, and protections), new programs that seek to facilitate new housing construction, preserve existing affordable housing, and to enact tenant protections have been tried, tested, funded, and legislated at the local, regional, and state levels.

How Gen Z Impacts Urban Mobility

How Gen Z Impacts Urban Mobility

New mobility culture calls into question the commute and opens new options for city planning and commute patterns. Our study found almost two-thirds of Gen Z consumers would be willing to accept a longer commute in a self-driving vehicle. While the single driver commuter experience is generally perceived as bad, unhealthy, and stressful, the “we” commute of mobility culture could be a positive and healthy experience similar to today’s train commutes.

MetroLab’s 10 Principles for Government + University Partnerships

MetroLab’s 10 Principles for Government + University Partnerships

Using tools like algorithms and sensors, smart cities increase the quality of life for their residents, by making these communities cleaner, safer and healthier. When done thoughtfully smart cities efforts can also strive to make cities more inclusive and equitable. At the end of the day, it’s all about the people who live in these communities and making their interactions with city and/or county services easier and better.

Share This