Schools Save Millions with Solar + Storage
The 125,000 public schools in the U.S., kindergarten through twelfth grade (K-12), spend $8 billion annually on energy. School districts are installing energy efficiency, solar, and energy storage to reduce energy cost, freeing more money for better education.
Schools represent about one-third of all solar PV installed in the U.S. Clovis Unified School District in California funded 5.9 MW of solar in 19 locations with a bond measure. Clovis now saves about $2.7 million annually in lower utility bills. Today, schools can often install solar, storage, and other energy solutions without any capital expenditure (capex) and without bond measures.
Schools are turning to solution providers like Green Charge, an Engie Company, to install large lithium batteries, power electronics, and use big data and machine learning to optimize battery use. I talked with Green Charge CEO, Vic Shao, about how they are helping schools cut energy costs, make best use of solar power, and make money from utility programs. Green Charge looks at a school’s energy use, and then proposes a Power Efficiency Agreement where batteries are installed and managed at zero cost to the school. A typical 10-year contract shares energy savings between the school and Green Charge in a win-win scenario.
Mountain View-Los Altos High School District (MVLA), in the heart of Silicon Valley, invested in energy efficiency and installed 1.26 MW of ground-mounted solar to meet half its energy needs. Yet even with efficiency and solar, utility bills eventually grew. Student population grew, buildings were added, and electric car charging installed. Utility bills soared when the school district exceeded their target peak demand for the month. Even minutes over peak can add thousands to the monthly utility bill. With batteries and advanced software, peak demand charges can often be avoided.
MVLA parents work at places like Tesla, Alphabet, and Oracle; it is no surprise that the district would not only use advanced batteries with its solar, but also would use intelligent storage management with big data and machine learning.
“Each year, we expect to reduce our demand charges by $86,000, if not more. Every dollar saved is a dollar we can spend in supporting greater educational opportunities,” stated Mike Mathiesen, Associate Superintendent, Business Services MVLA. There was no capital outlay in in this public-private partnership. Green Charge installed the advanced lithium batteries and cloud hosts the big data and machine learning for a monthly fee that is less than the energy saved.
Green Charge collects second-by-second energy-use data from all customers. It also subscribes to weather and solar forecasting data. With machine learning, Green Charge software gets continually smarter about forecasting the minute-by-minute energy use at a site and predicting solar generation. The software automates the charging and discharging of batteries, thereby avoiding peak demand charges.
Emergency Storm Shelters
From hurricanes to sub-zero storms, communities are looking to schools to serve as emergency shelters. In Florida, over 115 schools have installed solar with battery backup as part of the SunSmart E-Shelter Program, a program initially funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. With talk of new infrastructure programs, there could be new opportunities for schools.
After Superstorm Sandy, New York is interested in awarding several schools with funding for emergency shelter programs that use microgrids with storage.
School solar systems have also been incorporated into STEM learning programs. Teachers can use the open source EnergyWhiz curricula. In such a learning program, when the 10kW solar tracker array broke at Milford High School in Utah, the students engineered a solution that helped the professionals fix the system.
Solar + Storage
About 4,000 U.S. K-12 schools have solar systems totaling 490 MW, details Brighter Future: A Study on Solar in U.S. Schools, a report from the Solar Foundation and SEIA. Adding solar is a no-brainer in sunny states like California, Arizona, and Hawaii, but it is also widely adopted in states with high electricity costs and progressive policies like New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania. The report details the many states where over 90 percent of schools would make money by adding solar.
Add storage to solar, and a school has many ways to make or save money. Consider the following scenario. Many schools face peak energy demand in the morning. Classrooms and offices are heated or cooled after being empty all night. Computers and equipment are turned on. Everyone arrives. For these peak hours, battery power can be used, since batteries were fully charged in the middle of the night, taking advantage of deep off-peak time-of-use (TOU) rates.
In the middle of the day, maximum sun power is captured. For example, when I visited U.C. Davis, a massive 16 MW ground-mounted solar array captured maximum sun power, using a single-axis system to tilting the solar panels to face the sun crossing the sky. By late afternoon, energy demand declines at most schools enabling batteries to be fully charged.
In many areas, peak utility demand is now hours like 5 to 9 in the evening. Schools in many states can sell power to utilities during these hours at premium rates, or at least participate in demand response programs where energy use is curtailed to zero thanks to intelligent energy storage.
Over 100 schools are so efficient and use so much solar energy that they are zero-net energy (ZNE article). In the future, thousands of schools will be ZNE.
Multiple Cost Savings and Revenue Sources
Solar + storage can save schools money in added ways with cloud services such as Green Charge GridSynergy system. (1) Energy arbitrage: store excess solar energy and then discharge it when rates are higher. (2) Solar Firming: by sensing intermittent disruptions in solar output (e.g. passing clouds), the battery discharges power to keep supply at a consistent level, thereby avoiding usage peak demand charges. (3) Tariff optimization: supplement solar energy generation with stored power, so that grid usage stays below higher tariff threshold.
For customers, aggregators like Green Charge bid into the CAISO wholesale energy market and earns school districts added money by participating in demand response programs.
In San Diego County, California, Santana High School was the first of 14 schools in the Grossmont Union High School District to receive GridSynergy Storage. Two 250 kW/500 kWh Samsung lithium battery systems were installed on campus. Lithium batteries keep improving in energy density and falling costs. Schools win as Samsung aggressively competes with Panasonic, Tesla, LG Chem, BYD, and other energy giants. The Grossmont district will have 7.4 MWh of storage and $6.4 million in projected savings over the life of their Power Efficiency Agreement. Nearby Poway Unified School District, with over 40 K-12 schools, is installing an even larger system.
For utility, San Diego Gas and Electric, the energy storage at these two districts represents 15 MW that can be dispatched at peak hours as a virtual power plant. Major utilities in California are starting to reduce their use of natural gas (methane) peaker plants as the utilities turn to storage and energy aggregators such as Green Charge, Stem, and Advanced Microgrids. My SCE article.
As solar and batteries continue to drop in price and improve in efficiency a growing number of the 125,000 schools in the United States can take advantage of either solar or storage or both. Intelligent storage is helping schools and a wide range of government and commercial energy customers save with peak shaving, rate optimization, arbitrage and demand response. The economics are so powerful, that service providers like Green Charge are willing to install and maintain systems with no capital outlay, only requiring power purchase agreements, performance savings contracts, and other no-capex offerings.
By combining solar + storage + software + energy efficiency, schools may eventually save billions that can go to better classrooms, more teachers and aides, and better learning.
Read Green Charge’s Whitepaper: The Benefits of Solar & Storage for Commercial and Public Buildings
Featured Image: A 416 kW system at Analy High School in Sebastopol, CA. (Photo: SunPower)
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
The Remix team brings a multidisciplinary approach to their change management work, which helps them complement municipal government clients, whose stakeholders tend to be siloed into separate departments. “We’re fairly unique in the software industry, because our team is blended,” Tiffany explains. One half of their team is comprised of transportation practitioners and policy experts, and the other half is made up of software developers and designers. “We bring to transportation planning the culture of co-creation and fast iteration that is typically found in the software industry,” she says, “so, we go into a room having both those muscles to flex.”
A recent study by the International Downtown Association reports that vibrant downtowns contain around 3% of citywide land, but contain 14% of all citywide retail and food and beverage businesses, and 35% of all hotel rooms. This results in $53 million in sales tax per square mile, compared to the citywide average of $5 million. Not to mention that downtown residential buildings also add to the tax base. In the 24 cities included in the study, residential growth in these downtowns outpaced the rest of the city by 400% between 2010 and 2016.
Partnerships between city officials and contractors result in new and visionary downtown destinations. Along with large vertical construction projects, there are opportunities for countless other projects, including parking structures, enhanced Wi-Fi, landscaping, pedestrian and biking paths, and traffic improvements.
Ordered city geometry that is built today is meaningless for energy cycles. Resilient networks contain inherent diversity and redundancy, with optimal cooperation among their subsystems, yet they avoid optimization (maximum efficiency) for any single process. They require continuous input of energy in order to function, with energy cycles running simultaneously on many different scales.
Short-term urban fixes only wish to perpetuate the extractive model of cities, not to correct its underlying long-term fragility!