Scalable Water Management Solutions for Developed & Developing Cities
The growth of urban settlements is subject to a range of factors influenced by demographic, economic, political, environmental, cultural, and social factors. Weather variability, or climate change, has recently risen up this list. These two factors: climate change and urban population growth, are dramatically affecting urban water management. On one hand, growing populations increase urban water demand and on the other, climate change has increased water variability (volume, distribution, timing and quality).
Parallel to these factors, urban water management has a few problems of its own. Global water infrastructure, whether for water supply, storm or waste water management; is old and was built for the demand of cities 30 to 100 years ago. It is ill-equipped to handle the current challenges of today, including population growth and climate change. The water sector is conservative, focused on public health, reliable service, and compliance with regulations, with good reason. However, traditional centralized, networked systems of drinking water supply, storm water drainage, and wastewater disposal are not sufficient. In reality, water is demanded, and storm and waste water are generated in decentralized, disorganized locations.
Citizen concern is growing as they experience first-hand that growing populations and climate change have effects on their water. Water security, flooding, healthy water bodies, affordability of services, etc. are all trending stories in the news these days.
How will cities adapt? Reframe. Develop new responses.
Instead of sourcing water from sources farther away or deeper underground, what if we asked how to reduce our need? How do we reuse what we have, or recycle what we’ve used? Water management philosophy in cities has to evolve to include other solutions beyond new traditional infrastructure that very expensive to build and maintain and takes time to construct.
Changing the paradigm from traditional technocratic solutions to those that are more agile, adaptable, and affordable is the key for the future. Although the water sector is conservative by nature, it needs innovation to challenge the status quo and that can overcome the constraints of existing infrastructure, governance, and prior decisions. It’s easy to put blame on governments, which are working hard and dealing at high volume to supply the demand of constituents. Citizens also must change their habits and tastes in order to make change work.
Below, I review two water innovations that reduce, reuse, and recycle urban water resources. By no means are these innovations an exhaustive list, rather they are innovations that may influence and impact urban water supply management.
Reproducing Urban Supply
Water for human consumptive uses, like drinking, cooking, bathing etc. are the major concerns for urban areas. Globally, about 2.5 percent of the water in the world is freshwater, and only 32 percent of that is accessible. Although there is enough water in the world for everyone, the distribution of the resource is the one of most concern. Moreover, growing cities get thirsty fast, requiring exponentially more water for their people and their needs. How to quench the growing thirst without getting more water? The innovations below range from small to large scale solutions that create more water.
Water from the Sun
Water is all around us, even though we cannot see it. On sticky summer days we can feel it in the form of humidity or early mornings we can see it as fog. Science has long searched for ways to harvest atmospheric moisture but each solution had problems. Dehumidifiers consume lots of power, wick nets do not collect enough water, and both perform optimally in humid environments. The main question: how to develop a water harvesting solution that consumes low amounts of energy, produces enough volume of drinkable water, and that works in an arid environment.
The answer was found by combining material science, the understanding of dew point, and solar power into the creation of a solar water collector. Two similar approaches were developed in 2017 but the principles are the same: air is allowed to flow through the device, special nano-materials are used to collect the water molecules in that air, a temperature change is created to allow for condensation. The water is then collected. The energy and the aridity problem are solved at the same time through the use of solar power. The products that are in development can generate about 3 liters of water per day, and that level of water production is scalable. The science fiction of pulling water out of thin, dry air is fast becoming fact.
Water from our Waste
The second innovation in reproducing water supply may not be as appetizing as the previous: water from waste. If you are like me and enjoy watching survivor reality shows, we have seen the star drink “water” from animal dung or even consume their own urine. Although it turns our stomach, we accept it as a form of survival. But can we accept something similar for our daily water intake? Reclaimed waste water is not a new concept in the field of engineering, but it is something that is hard to swallow conceptually.
Countries like Namibia, one of the driest on earth, have been doing this for decades. Before the mid-1900’s, the capital city of Windhoek sourced local springs for drinking water supply. When these springs dried up, combined with years of drought, the most viable way to keep with demand was wastewater reuse.
The process is natural; bacteria aid in the processing of human waste, while at the same time draw out moisture, doing what nature would do normally, just faster. Of course, the water is treated before it is recirculated into the water supply system.
Bill Gates was recently recorded drinking a glass of “poop water” to demonstrate the product of the Omniprocessor, a project funded by the Gates Foundation. It is the evolution of wastewater reuse. The machine is fed sludge which is then boiled. The water vapor is the first byproduct that is turned into drinking water. The dried sludge is the second byproduct which is burned to fuel the machine as well as produce excess energy to feed a power grid. The burned ash is a third byproduct that can be disposed of without any harmful issue. The machine is a closed system that is more modular than a wastewater facility, and affordable enough for developing countries.
Each of these solutions also provides added value. The solar water collector and Omniprocesser both generate their own power, which lower the impacts on the environment. Solar water can be scaled up to provide more water in arid areas without additional infrastructure. Water from waste embraces the 1980’s concept of Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle for human waste, and also mitigates the impact of wastewater treatment.
Urban water management strategies have been conservative for the last century, focusing on capital-intensive infrastructure solutions for water supply. In the years to come, urban water systems will need to integrate existing infrastructure with innovations in providing hybrid solutions that are agile, adaptable, and affordable. Although change rarely happens unless there is some catastrophic event, the confluence of population growth and climate change have managed to force cities and their respective water authorities to change the paradigm. Solar water collectors and water from waste are two such innovations that are agile, adaptive, and affordable for the developed and developing world to supplement the growing demand for water. However, we should always be mindful of how much we use versus how much we need.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
OurStreets origins are rooted in capturing latent sentiment on social media and converting it to standardized data. It all started in July 2018, when OurStreets co-founder, Daniel Schep, was inspired by the #bikeDC community tweeting photos of cars blocking bike lanes, and built the @HowsMyDrivingDC Twitter bot. The bot used license plate info to produce a screenshot of the vehicle’s outstanding citations from the DC DMV website.
Fast forward to March 2020, and D.C. Department of Public Works asking if we could repurpose OurStreets to crowdsource the availability of essential supplies during the COVID-19 crisis. Knowing how quickly we needed to move in order to be effective, we set out to make a new OurStreets functionality viable nationwide.
The best nature-based solutions on urban industrial lands are those that are part of a corporate citizenship or conservation strategy like DTE’s or Phillips66. By integrating efforts such as tree plantings, restorations, or pollinator gardens into a larger strategy, companies begin to mainstream biodiversity into their operations. When they crosswalk the effort to other CSR goals like employee engagement, community relations, and/or workforce development, like the CommuniTree initiative, the projects become more resilient.
Air quality in urban residential communities near industrial facilities will not be improved by nature alone. But nature can contribute to the solution, and while doing so, bring benefits including recreation, education, and an increased sense of community pride. As one tool to combat disparate societal outcomes, nature is accessible, affordable and has few, if any, downsides.
I spoke last week to Adrian Benepe, former commissioner for the NYC Parks Department and currently the Senior Vice President and Director of National Programs at The Trust for Public Land.
We discussed a lot of things – the increased use of parks in the era of COVID-19, the role parks have historically played – and currently play – in citizens’ first amendment right to free speech and protests, access & equity for underserved communities, the coming budget shortfalls and how they might play out in park systems.
I wanted to pull out the discussion we had about funding for parks and share Adrian’s thoughts with all of you, as I think it will be most timely and valuable as we move forward with new budgets and new realities.