Revitalizing Cities One Neighborhood at a Time

By Jim Brooks

Mr. Brooks has spent the past 26 years as an advocate and policy specialist for cities both in the United States and abroad. His particular areas of expertise include housing, community development, infrastructure, global competitiveness, and civic engagement. He regularly provides information and commentary to news media in all its forms.

Dec 22, 2014 | Smart Cities | 2 comments

Why do new residents choose one city over another or one neighborhood over another? Several factors that are consistent across many research studies include affordable housing, safe and walkable streets, access to employment and mobility networks, options for entertainment and recreation, and the often intangible characteristic known as “buzz.”

The City of Baltimore (population 622,000) has struggled with economic stagnation, population outmigration, and tens of thousands of vacant and abandoned houses. The story of how Charm City is seeking to attract new residents, recapture safe and walkable streets, rebuild abandoned neighborhoods, and catalyze its own urban buzz, is a story about a diverse set of partnerships using a “big tent” model to bring together philanthropies, real estate developers, educational institutions, church congregations, community development stakeholders, business owners, housing advocates, and city officials.

Investments and Partnerships

Baltimore is growing modestly in population by seeking young knowledge workers and demonstrating openness to immigrants. Extensive investments in education and new school construction also are designed to lure families with children. On offer are neighborhoods with solid housing stock, parks and open space, and proximity to jobs and entertainment. The hope is that these assets will have a significant influence on whether Baltimore can achieve the goal of attracting 10,000 new families (some 22,000 individuals) by 2021.

Signature initiatives for the city include the Vacants to Value program to rehabilitate vacant housing and offer home buyer incentives. Part of this program includes the demolition of 4,000 blighted structures meant to leave some land vacant as green space or as adjunct side yards for existing homes or community gardens. The mayor also intends to cut city property taxes by 20 percent (reducing the cost of government in the process) and invest in core infrastructure, including mobility strategies. A partnership with the state will invest $1.1 billion in new public school construction (10-15 buildings) and rehabilitation.

Neighborhood by Neighborhood

The grass roots Southeast Community Organization (SECO) dates to 1971 and the neighborhood opposition to proposed construction of an express highway (Interstate 83). The successful effort to prevent the highway from running through the southeast waterfront was one catalyst that resulted in the creation of what is today known as the Southeast Community Development Corporation (SECDC).

From its inception, SECDC was concerned about investment in community facilities such as neighborhood grocery stores, protection of open space such as Patterson Park, and affordable housing for the diverse and growing number of residents. Operations now include financial and housing counseling services and administration of both the Highlandtown Main Street program and the Arts and Entertainment District.

Integral to the work of SECDC is arts education and production programs organized and supported by Creative Alliance. Also focusing on the Highlandtown neighborhood, the Alliance envisioned a multi-arts center with artist studios, galleries, a theater, sidewalk café, and offices. In 2003, the restored Patterson Movie Theater (The Patterson) was reopened after a successful capital campaign that raised over $3.6 million through State of Maryland smart growth bonds, foundation and private sector dollars, and Congressional appropriations. Today, Creative Alliance delivers engaging cultural experiences through hundreds of events each year – art and film exhibitions, concerts, theater, and classes and workshops for both adults and youth that connect artists to audiences and generate creative ideas.

Launched at the beginning of the 21st century with a boost from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the East Baltimore Development, Inc. (EBDI) seeks to transform 80 acres adjacent to the Johns Hopkins University and Hospital complex into a mixed-income residential neighborhood with roughly 2,200 new and rehabilitated homes, anchored by a university research and development building, commercial space, an elementary school, grocery store, and parkland. While a considerable amount of vacant land still remains where homes were demolished, new senior housing is now in place, as is the Henderson-Hopkins school and the university research center. Despite progress that is slower than desired, Johns Hopkins president Ronald J. Daniels has publicly stated his intention to be a significant player in the city’s revitalization.

The Central Baltimore Partnership (CBP) is newer than EBDI and encompasses an enormous swath of territory extending through ten neighborhoods anchored by the city’s Penn Station, Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA), and the University of Baltimore in the south, and the Johns Hopkins Homewood campus in the north. Within its borders are the Station North Arts District and the Charles North historic district. As with the city’s other coalition of partners,

CBP brings together public, private, and neighborhood interests for a comprehensive community development strategy. Projects already completed include housing at Landbank Lofts and the mixed-use development at Miller’s Court as well as the North Avenue Market. Several other mixed use projects are still in development as is the restoration of the Parkway Theater at North and Charles Streets.

The city government does not want for allies. BRIDGE Maryland, a coalition of 20 diverse church congregations advocating for social justice, drives grass roots efforts to ensure that the region’s poor and disenfranchised have a voice in public decision-making. The University of Maryland BioPark at the West Baltimore medical center campus is an economic development catalyst on formerly vacant land adjacent to the Poppleton neighborhood. Seawall Development, a private company, has made significant investments in mixed-use housing projects including Millers Court (mentioned above) and Union Mill in the Hampden area.

Conclusions

There is considerable room for optimism in the City of Baltimore. Driving around the city, whether in Hampden or along Charles Street or the revitalized 36th Street commercial corridor, there are reminders that the city has good bones. Iconic buildings, broad avenues, and many promising neighborhoods constitute a firm foundation for prosperity and growth. However, challenges remain.

The challenges include a dearth of corporate leaders to coalesce around a shared agenda, few strong and well-capitalized community development financial institutions (CDFIs), the physical barrier of Interstate 83 (which structurally divides the city), polarization along lines of race and class, drug and crime issues, and a lingering problem with capacity inside the city government. A further issue is whether or not the city is effectively coordinating and collaborating with these various community groups to help them achieve their maximum potential. These issues notwithstanding, community partnerships are a formidable force for positive change in Baltimore.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

2 Comments

  1. Good article Jim. Your analysis of Baltimore’s approach taps into a molecular approach to improving our cities, I think. Whether it is an urban acupuncture approach (http://www.governing.com/columns/assessments/gov-urban-acupuncture.html) or a small, smart city approach (http://cityminded.org/find-big-opportunities-smart-cities-go-small-10663), making improvements that start at a smaller level, citizen supported and one-step-at-a-time, a one neighborhood at a time perspective is likely to generate more value than the grandiose initiatives that get headlines these days.

    Reply
  2. Thank you for taking the time to comment. I believe that city leaders can achieve solid traction when working at the neighborhood level. Success can set a foundation for further efforts and nurturing prosperity.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

How to Move More People with Fewer Vehicles

How to Move More People with Fewer Vehicles

Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.

Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.

Planning for Arts and Culture in San Diego

Planning for Arts and Culture in San Diego

The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.  

Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.

Sustainable Cities Need Smart Investment and Policies

Sustainable Cities Need Smart Investment and Policies

While the outlook for the environment may often seem bleak, there are many proven methods already available for cities to make their energy systems and other infrastructure not only more sustainable, but cheaper and more resilient at the same time. This confluence of benefits will drive investments in clean, efficient energy, transportation, and water infrastructure that will enable cities to realize their sustainability goals.

Given that many of the policy mechanisms that impact cities’ ability to boost sustainability are implemented at the state or federal level, municipalities should look to their own operations to implement change. Cities can lead as a major market player, for example, by converting their own fleets to zero emission electric vehicles, investing in more robust and efficient water facilities, procuring clean power, and requiring municipal buildings to be LEED certified.

Share This