Observations from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s FLEXLAB

By Hannah Greinetz

Hannah Greinetz is the Managing Editor of the Meeting of the Minds Blog. She holds a BA in Anthropology from UC Santa Cruz and an MBA in Sustainable Management from Presidio Graduate School.

Nov 10, 2015 | Smart Cities | 0 comments

The Meeting of the Minds conference this year was a stimulating gathering of thought leaders, city leaders, and change makers, held in Richmond, California’s historic Craneway Pavilion. The agenda of esteemed speakers covered everything from Singapore’s NEWater strategy, to the strategy behind creating a sustainable economy in Detroit, to digital currencies and affordable housing in Vancouver.

During the afternoon of October 21, conference attendees broke out into groups and boarded the buses waiting outside to take them to afternoon breakout sessions, one of which was a tour of UC Berkeley’s FLEXLAB facility focused on how we can reduce energy consumption of commercial buildings.

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s FLEXLAB sits high in the hills above the UC Berkeley Campus and exists to address the fact that a staggering 40% of our electrical energy use is by commercial office buildings. In 2012, with $15.9million in funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Berkeley Lab broke ground on a flexible design test bed for building efficiency technologies. FLEXLAB derives its name from the purpose for the research being conducted there: Facility for Low Energy eXperiments in Buildings; the test beds there test the efficiency of HVAC, lighting, windows, building envelope, control systems, and plug loads, in any combination.

As we filed off of the buses, our backs to a stunning view of Oakland, Berkeley, and San Francisco, we approached the four buildings that make up the test beds at FLEXLAB. There are two identical buildings with interchangeable siding and south-facing windows that are designed to let users test drive a technology side by side and monitor the results. A third building is mounted on a 270 degree rotating cement slab that can control for the position of a building’s windows or capture data from the windows or PV panels from different angles. Each of the buildings is outfitted with about 2,000 sensors to monitor things like heat, moisture, glare, and temperature. The buildings are designed to test different components of a building that impact its energy use, and by testing them at FLEXLAB, with its 6,000+ sensors and data analysis, builders and developers can be sure that they’re installing the optimal mix of windows, HVAC, solar PV, and even desks and carpets, to ensure peak efficiency.

Real Time Experimentation

In the first private sector installation at FLEXLAB, Webcor Builders installed the siding, windows, ventilation systems, lighting, and even the desks they planned to use in Genentech’s newly constructed 250,000 square foot office building in South San Francisco office. The test beds at FLEXLAB enabled Webcor to mock up the components of the Genentech building and test the combination and design before they started building. The series of tests was designed to enable decision making on shading and lighting components of the building; they also used the rotating test bed to test three different potential orientations of the building.

As a result, Webcor was able to maximize the efficiency of space in the building, and minimize glare, maximizing comfort at workstations near the windows. Although FLEXLAB was just opening its doors and Webcor was relatively close to breaking ground on the new Genentech office when the tests were conducted, the FLEXLAB project was still able to add great value to the Genentech building in finding the best management practices of shading and light controls.

Berkeley Lab’s Global Partnership Alliance

For the second segment of our visit, the Meeting of the Minds group engaged in discussion with the founder of the Global Partnership Alliance (GPA), Rahul Chopra. Rahul introduced our group to the driving ideas behind GPA: “to standardize, commercialize, and monetize energy efficiency in buildings, creating new investment opportunities that will drive deep cuts in building energy use.” He then asked the group for our thoughts on how we can bring private ideas and investment dollars in to capitalize on the $290billion market opportunity that commercial energy efficiency represents, and with a room full of business minds and thought leaders on the subject, a lively discussion ensued.

Rahul seeded the conversation with ideas of how buildings can act as part of the interactive energy ecosystem, asking: ‘how can buildings influence the grid in a positive way? Electric vehicles, microgrids, energy storage, solar PV, and productivity data are all aspects of the answers that GPA is considering. The conversation also centered around how new market initiatives will enable the monetization of building energy efficiency, especially without government incentives. Ideas around the renaissance of REIT capital prompted discussion of a rooftop REIT, separate from the assets of the building. The large market for efficiency data analytics also came into play in a discussion around data sharing and metrics for success that investors will be able to use to guarantee performance and energy savings on capital invested into building efficiency.

GPA is seeking to bridge the gap between the technologies being tested at FLEXLAB, and successfully monetize and bring them to the market via public-private partnerships and new market mechanisms. Today, they’re working on creating guarantees for performance to reduce project performance risk in building efficiency investments; integrated building management systems; and creating IBOS, a standardized operating system for smart buildings that will be able to collect data, control operations, and create data analytics to open up further possibilities for innovation in how buildings perform.

 

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

Encouraging Civic Engagement with What Matters Most to Residents

Encouraging Civic Engagement with What Matters Most to Residents

OurStreets origins are rooted in capturing latent sentiment on social media and converting it to standardized data. It all started in July 2018, when OurStreets co-founder, Daniel Schep, was inspired by the #bikeDC community tweeting photos of cars blocking bike lanes, and built the @HowsMyDrivingDC Twitter bot. The bot used license plate info to produce a screenshot of the vehicle’s outstanding citations from the DC DMV website.

Fast forward to March 2020, and D.C. Department of Public Works asking if we could repurpose OurStreets to crowdsource the availability of essential supplies during the COVID-19 crisis. Knowing how quickly we needed to move in order to be effective, we set out to make a new OurStreets functionality viable nationwide.

How Urban Industry Can Contribute Green Solutions for COVID-Related Health Disparities

How Urban Industry Can Contribute Green Solutions for COVID-Related Health Disparities

The best nature-based solutions on urban industrial lands are those that are part of a corporate citizenship or conservation strategy like DTE’s or Phillips66. By integrating efforts such as tree plantings, restorations, or pollinator gardens into a larger strategy, companies begin to mainstream biodiversity into their operations. When they crosswalk the effort to other CSR goals like employee engagement, community relations, and/or workforce development, like the CommuniTree initiative, the projects become more resilient.

Air quality in urban residential communities near industrial facilities will not be improved by nature alone. But nature can contribute to the solution, and while doing so, bring benefits including recreation, education, and an increased sense of community pride. As one tool to combat disparate societal outcomes, nature is accessible, affordable and has few, if any, downsides.

Crisis funding for public parks

Crisis funding for public parks

I spoke last week to Adrian Benepe, former commissioner for the NYC Parks Department and currently the Senior Vice President and Director of National Programs at The Trust for Public Land.

We discussed a lot of things – the increased use of parks in the era of COVID-19, the role parks have historically played – and currently play – in citizens’ first amendment right to free speech and protests, access & equity for underserved communities, the coming budget shortfalls and how they might play out in park systems.

I wanted to pull out the discussion we had about funding for parks and share Adrian’s thoughts with all of you, as I think it will be most timely and valuable as we move forward with new budgets and new realities.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

Sign up for our email list to receive resources and invites related to sustainability, equity, and technology in cities!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This