Mobilizing Entrepreneurs To Make An Urban Impact
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Having trouble finding a parking space? San Francisco-based Park Please takes the AirBNB model and applies it to help frustrated city drivers find parking spaces.
Longing for a coffee shop or organic food store in your neighborhood? Washington, DC-based Popularise allows individuals to vocalize support for and invest in local real estate projects.
Unhappy with the food options in your child’s school? Oakland-based Revolution Foods provides healthy, fresh, and affordable meals to school districts in over 20 cities across the US.
Our goal is to build a pipeline of companies supporting innovation in US cities.From Zipcar to Recyclebank, entrepreneurs are developing creative solutions to urban problems in their own backyards. Their innovative consumer products and services have the potential to scale massively from city to city – and we believe that there should be more of them tackling urban problems.
But these urban impact entrepreneurs face a unique set of challenges. In July 2012, our company, Tumml, conducted a survey among 106 early-stage entrepreneurs – about a third of whom focused on urban innovation. The results shed light on many of the hurdles facing urban impact entrepreneurs:
- Urban impact entrepreneurs do not have sufficient access to capital: Early stage companies focusing on urban innovation are less than half as likely as their traditional counterparts to receive seed stage funding. Even when normalizing for demographic factors such as number of entrepreneurial ventures and educational background, 33 percent of traditional entrepreneurs were able to secure venture capital or angel investment, compared with only 15 percent of the urban impact entrepreneurs.
- Urban impact entrepreneurs are not getting the right kind of mentorship and support: Urban innovators are nearly twice as likely to seek out access to government and civic leaders (30% urban impact vs. 18% traditional). Although they are not looking to get hired by government, these entrepreneurs still need help navigating the local regulatory environment. For example, a bike share company needs help securing public space permits for their racks.
In short, financial and mentorship challenges are setting back a major movement in urban impact entrepreneurship. And, until more attention is paid to these upstarts, we are not going to see massive urban innovation coming from the entrepreneurship community.
So, you may wonder, why is the lack of urban impact entrepreneurship a problem? Shouldn’t we count on government to take on city issues? In the current economic climate, we cannot rely on government alone to tackle our urban problems. More than half of US cities canceled or delayed infrastructure projects last year and 2012 will be the fifth straight year of declining city revenues. These cuts are having profoundly negative impacts on the safety, education, mobility, and health of the 81 percent of Americans who live in and around cities.
What about large companies? Aren’t they making cities a better place to live? Absolutely. There are a few large companies thinking about smart cities and the promise of urban innovation. Meeting of the Minds is born out of the idea that governments, companies, and policy advocates can come together to enhance urban communities.
Nevertheless, engaging the entrepreneurship community is essential to move the needle on urban innovation. Entrepreneurs are disruptive and nimble, and they are the ones who are going to develop innovative consumer products and services to tackle problems related to education, health, transportation, security, energy, and civic participation.
So we are proposing something new.
In 2013, we will formally launch Tumml, an urban ventures accelerator. Our goal is to build a pipeline of companies supporting innovation in US cities by targeting “smart cities” sectors like transportation and education (we’re looking for the next Alta Bicycle Share and Neighborland). We will provide a home for urban impact entrepreneurs in the same way that RockHealth does for digital health companies and Code for America does for Gov 2.0 entrepreneurs.
More specifically, Tumml will invite promising young companies to spend four months working in our offices. During that time, Tumml provides them with a customized education curriculum, legal services, access to top-flight mentors and support staff, as well as opportunities to connect with civic leaders. What kind of mentors are we talking about? We’ve signed up government leaders from across the country like the San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Innovation, successful urban impact entrepreneurs like the founders of Revolution Foods, innovative policy leaders like the Initiative For a Competitive Inner City, and investors who can help these companies go from conception to full-fledged roll out. Tumml will also grant each company in its accelerator program $20,000 in seed funding.
Through Tumml, we hope to bridge an important gap in funding and mentorship so that entrepreneurs can play an active role in urban innovation. And we encourage you to start your own urban impact company, support your local urban entrepreneurs, and be part of changing the landscapes of our cities for the better.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
This article was originally published on September 8, 2020.
Update for April 20, 2021:
After the murder of George Floyd we wrote this article as a kind of blueprint, a beginning to a new way of working with equitable resilience in our cities and beyond. Now, as the trial of Derek Chauvin comes to a guilty verdict in Minneapolis and the whole country reflects on the legacy of that verdict, we have to remember another senseless murder – another young Black man, Daunte Wright, at the hands of law enforcement, just miles from the courthouse. Again, Minneapolis is all of us. We have protested, we have voted. We stood up, we spoke out, we have raged about the anti-Black racism. We have seen people come together, we can feel a shift in this country. But there is so much more to do. No equity, no resilience.
-Ron & Stewart
Housing that is affordable to low-income residents is often substandard and suffering from deferred maintenance, exposing residents to poor air quality and high energy bills. This situation can exacerbate asthma and other respiratory health issues, and siphon scarce dollars from higher value items like more nutritious food, health care, or education. Providing safe, decent, affordable, and healthy housing is one way to address historic inequities in community investment. Engaging with affordable housing and other types of community benefit projects is an important first step toward fully integrating equity into the green building process. In creating a framework for going deeper on equity, our new book, the Blueprint for Affordable Housing (Island Press 2020), starts with the Convention on Human Rights and the fundamental right to housing.
Since the Great Recession of 2008, the housing wealth gap has expanded to include not just Black and Brown Americans, but younger White Americans as well. Millennials and Generation Z Whites are now joining their Black and Brown peers in facing untenable housing precarity and blocked access to wealth. With wages stuck at 1980 levels and housing prices at least double (in inflation adjusted terms) what they were 40 years ago, many younger Americans, most with college degrees, are giving up on buying a home and even struggle to rent apartments suitable for raising a family.
What makes it hard for policy people and citizens to accept this truth is that we have not seen this problem in a very long time. Back in the 1920s of course, but not really since then. But this is actually an old problem that has come back to haunt us; a problem first articulated by Adam Smith in the 1700s.