Meeting of the Minds 2015 Hackathon Recap
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
On October 17th and 18th, The Meeting of the Minds (MOTM) Hackathon brought together designers, developers, and entrepreneurs to hack on social good projects focused on the city of Richmond. It was the first hackathon ever held in Richmond, CA and was sponsored by Qualcomm and Microsoft. The Hackathon set out to provide urban sustainability solutions to social, environmental, and technology issues facing the city and its residents. The City of Richmond staff – including the Mayor’s Office, IT Department, Environment Program, and others – were great partners and provided datasets and key issue areas for the hackathon teams to focus on. The hack was held in the historic Ford Assembly Plant – the Craneway Pavilion – along the beautiful waterfront at the southern edge of Richmond, with amazing views of the San Francisco skyline!
The level of talent and creativity on display at the hackathon was pretty amazing to see. Tasked with creating solutions that focused on the city of Richmond, the participating teams did not disappoint. Developers came out in full force with a number of interesting projects ranging from collaborative workout apps to hardware driven solutions. After the initial presentations by the sponsors, everyone had the chance to devise ideas and form teams to make these projects happen. With a total of six teams, the room was alight with excited plans of what the weekend would hold!
Hack kits were provided by OSIsoft, World Programming, and Microsoft. Qualcomm also stepped into the game to provide Dragon boards and Gimbal brought Bluetooth beacons. All in all, there was quite a bit of tech to be hacked with as well as a number of urban sustainability issues that were kicked around.
So What Is a Hackathon?
The word “hackathon” is a mashup of the words “hack” and “marathon”. Hacking refers to innovative team-based solution building (hacks) to an existing problem within a short time-frame. Typically 24 hours is the length of a hackathon, but these events can be as short as 9 hours and as long as 48. Companies like Facebook and Google and other organizations have applied this method of innovation to solve their biggest internal challenges. This concept is now being applied to industries besides technology and, in this case, the entire city of Richmond!
More specifically, a hackathon is made up of the following:
- Participants – designers, developers, and general attendees form teams based on personal interests
- Teams create solutions for proposed challenges – Usually, this means developing an app
- Challenge Process – Teams present their solutions to be judged by a panel of experts. Good presentations typically take the cake.
- Judging and Winner Announcement – Judges decide on the winners and with much fanfare, winners are announced
The Wikipedia definition of a hackathon reads:
“… An event in which computer programmers and others involved in software development, including graphic designers, interface designers and project managers, collaborate intensively on software projects. Hackathons typically last between a day and a week. Some hackathons are intended simply for educational or social purposes, although in many cases the goal is to create usable software.”
With amazing food served by Bubbaloo Cafe, a local restaurant, the attendees were well fed and properly caffeinated for the long haul. Good food, plus solid wifi and plenty of space to spread out are all essentials of a great hackathon and the teams used the time to come up with a number of great solutions.
Why Run A Hackathon with the City of Richmond?
The city of Richmond is an unknown hotbed of innovation in the San Francisco Bay Area. The Meeting of the Minds summit chose Richmond to convene 400+ urban sustainability leaders because Richmond’s progressive leadership and innovators are implementing cutting-edge policies, attracting and supporting new incubators and sustainable businesses, and carving out a new post-industrial identity. Pogo Park, the new Greenway, Urban Tilth’s new 3-acre urban farm, new housing policies, Marin Clean Energy’s community choice aggregation model, community-led policing, a new Climate Action Plan, the new UC Berkeley Global Campus, ferry service to San Francisco starting in 2017, and the rethinking of the Point Molate Historic District are just some of the exciting and cutting-edge projects happening in Richmond right now. The hackathon was a great way to quickly build upon some of the activities in Richmond and bring a new group of designers, coders, and entrepreneurs to apply their talent towards solving urban issues facing the city. The goal was to:
- Organize people around specific problem sets and brainstorming ideas – “We want to make our city sustainable. Let’s get the environmental affairs people together with the technologists ” type of hackathon. The more specific the problem and the more data on that problem that can be provided, the better the solutions will be.
- Organize to recruit people into the civic innovation community – More engaged populations can improve the community since there are simply more eyeballs on a problem. Hackathons can be great recruiting tools to get more people engaged within the community as well as jazzed up about solving a particular issue.
Who Won The MOTM Hackathon?
A total of six teams competed in this year’s Hackathon. The competition was tough and each team came up with fantastic urban sustainability solutions for the City of Richmond. The winning team received $5,000 cash prize awarded by Qualcomm.
The top three teams were Team Stride, Team Rootid, and Team Labor2Day. Each of these teams went on to present on stage in the plenary session at Meeting of the Minds 2015.
A round of applause for the top team:
MOTM Hackathon Winner ($5000) – Team Stride – The “Let’s Stride” project is a community and health fitness app designed to use the neighborhoods you live in as an obstacle course to get fit. The idea is to leverage the natural surroundings to improve physical fitness and also incentivize activity by involving local businesses / restaurants. This team hailed from Stride Center in Oakland, CA.
Here is the full list of projects/teams that participated in the Hackathon:
Team / Project Overview
- Team Coup – A smart circuit breaker to control energy consumption.
- Team Rootid – Stalk Exchange is a place for neighbors to swap produce, skills and gratitude. We seek to help neighbors: reduce food waste, have better access to healthy foods, create relationships, and help one another. Read their blog post about their experience here: http://www.rootid.in/think/our-first-hack-thon-joys-lessons-learned
- Team IOTEcoSystem – Developing an eco-system to help the community to retrieve their lost and stolen property, particularly bike theft. To involve the city to have a small task force when the law enforcement does not have the resources.
- Team Stride – Let’s Stride is a community and health fitness app designed to use the neighborhoods you live in as an obstacle course to get fit.
- Team Labor2Day – Labor2Day connects day laborers to employers in the city of Richmond via text messaging. Read their blog post about their experience here: http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/newsandevents/news/20151020-motm-hackathon
- Team WHOmentors.com – WOO (window of opportunity) app automates the WCCUSD student work permit process to assist Richmond residents in pursuing higher education and accelerate securing meaningful employment.
To get in touch with any of the hackathon teams about their apps, please contact Jessie Hahn at email@example.com.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).
As extreme weather conditions become the new normal—from floods in Baton Rouge and Venice to wildfires in California, we need to clean and save stormwater for future use while protecting communities from flooding and exposure to contaminated water. Changing how we manage stormwater has the potential to preserve access to water for future generations; prevent unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and damage to communities; and increase investments in green, climate-resilient infrastructure, with a focus on communities where these kinds of investments are most needed.
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?