Insights for Weathering Dynamic Shifts in Community Redevelopment

By Othello Meadows

Othello Meadows is the President and CEO of the Seventy Five North Revitalization Corp.

Mar 19, 2018 | Society | 6 comments

Seventy Five North is a community-based organization created to facilitate the revitalization of a healthy, sustainable, mixed-income community in the Highlander neighborhood of North Omaha, Nebraska. We are currently finishing up our first phase of development which includes 101 units of housing and a 65,000 square foot community enrichment hub. We’re also approaching the end of the second year of an innovative partnership with Howard Kennedy Elementary school and Omaha Public Schools to improve educational outcomes and access for children and families in Highlander.

I’ve been at this for about seven years now. I’ve experienced a lot of ups and downs. Huge victories and more than my share of crushing setbacks. For those of you who work in community development, that rhythm is probably all too familiar. This work offers you the opportunity to learn and get better every day if you can endure the swings endemic to it. I’ve attempted to summarize some of my key learnings and insights below. As I wrote this article, I realized that the handful of things that I’m writing about now are probably different than they would have been three years ago. If I were to write something like this next year, they’d probably be different again. That’s the nature of most difficult or complex things. They are dynamic. Things change. Different insights are required.

As of now, three things stand out to me:

  • The importance of right-sizing the challenge you are undertaking,
  • Forcing yourself to break away from your day to day to reflect on the reason(s) you do what you do, and
  • The importance of starting everything you do in the manner you would like it to finish.

 

Take a Manageable Bite

Neighborhoods are discrete. They are unique, complex and dynamic. Despite all of this, in community development we tend to overestimate our own geographic reach while underestimating the real impact that can be had with a deeper dive into a smaller target area. People in this field are ambitious and relentlessly optimistic. You can’t do this work well without those characteristics. It is often our Achilles heel (among a few). Many redevelopment or revitalization initiatives focus on unreasonably large areas often involving multiple neighborhoods. This is frequently exacerbated by the belief of many non-residents that communities of color and or communities experiencing significant poverty are monolithic with the same assets, issues, and possibilities. My experience is that these communities are as different from each other as they are a neighborhood in any other part of a particular city. In North Omaha for instance, our neighborhood, Highlander, is significantly different from Florence, another North Omaha community.

This approach is also a major part of what attracted us to the Purpose Built Communities model. Purpose Built Communities is an outgrowth of some incredibly transformational work done in the Eastlake neighborhood of Atlanta, Georgia. In short, the model works to create three things: a cradle to college educational pipeline; high quality mixed-income housing; and a network of community health, wellness, and economic development partnerships, within a well-defined and understood neighborhood. This model, and especially the focus on a defined neighborhood is a result of learning first-hand how difficult the work of neighborhood revitalization really is. We feel that concentrating the efforts of our organization and the strength of best in class partners in a deep and intentional way within Highlander gives us the best opportunity to be successful.

 

Make Time for Reflection

Distance from a thing seems to create a powerful energy in me. The act of consciously disconnecting and then purposefully reconnecting to the core elements of the work I am engaged in has been an effective tool for maintaining my energy levels and clarity of thought. Even knowing this, a couple of years ago I was finding it nearly impossible to tear myself away from our day to day work. To be fair, we were then, as we are now, engaged in a large, complicated development project entailing the construction of mixed-income housing and a large community enrichment building. I had just hired a fantastic number two, and together we had soon settled into a hectic, but somewhat comfortable routine of getting sh*t done.

What wasn’t happening on a regular basis was the opportunity to think broadly about new approaches we wanted to try out or what we were learning from all this box-checking. We didn’t have any time to vet that crazy idea that might have some legs, or to think about the larger picture. In short, we didn’t have any time to think, dream, or talk about the things that drew us to this work in the first place. I wasn’t creating a climate that encouraged creativity and risk taking.

About two years ago, we started a very intentional process of reengaging with the reasons we do what we do. Every other month we meet for breakfast at greasy spoon on the far north side of the city before heading to a retreat center in the Ponca Hills, ten minutes outside of Omaha. The center, which is really just a cool house in the woods run by the free-est of free spirits, sits inside a nature reserve. Sometimes we do strategic planning, sometimes we talk about office culture. I’ve found that it really doesn’t matter. What matters is that the time is protected and valued by our team.

 

Start how You Want to Finish

Earlier in my career I learned the hard way that you can never ratchet expectations above the baseline you set in those critical early moments of a project or initiative. People and organizations very quickly settle into the level of performance that they deem acceptable to you. Often you aren’t even aware of the cues that people are taking to establish this baseline.

One of the non-negotiable elements of the model we subscribe to is the importance of mixed-income housing to the overall health of the neighborhood. True mixed-income housing, not a handful of affordable units sprinkled into a largely market-rate building, embeds not only a sense of dignity but also the feeling of connectedness by deliberately making no distinction (finishes, floorplans, amenities, etc.) between rental units based on the income of the occupant.

Our first phase of housing was roughly 60 percent affordable and 30 percent market rate. As we began to interview property management firms, it became clear that our values weren’t necessarily aligned with the industry’s perspective on customer service and community relations. In fairness to the local management industry, the truly mixed-income is relatively new nationally, and virtually non-existent in Omaha prior to our endeavor.  That being said, I wasn’t prepared for what that inexperience (to be kind) meant for our relationship with our eventual management partner.

After we selected a firm, yet still early in the building process, our team sat gathered around a conference table discussing the ins and outs of each of the apartment buildings under construction. As we discussed the finishes for the units, our construction manager indicated that each apartment would be outfitted with granite countertops and stainless steel appliances. Without thinking (clearly), one of the property management people quickly said, “even the affordable units?” with considerable surprise. Instantly, I remembered the impossibility of raising the bar after you let it get set lower than you want from those early career foibles. The response, innocuous to some, was a clear signal to our team that the management firm was in the process of placing our property in the “affordable” category of their portfolio which we anticipated meaning a lesser level of service and customer care. They were pushing the bar down, consciously or unconsciously, right in front of us.

I stopped the meeting. We felt that it was critical to firmly establish the level of service we were expecting for our residents. It was tense for a moment but you could see the team assigned to our property shift their approach and buy into the larger mission of our organization. Over time we’ve seen them internalize our values as it relates to the experience we are trying to deliver to the people we are fortunate enough to serve. We continue to hold them to this higher standard but because we started in the right place with a common understanding of how we would treat residents and how we would interact with the community, the subsequent discussions are slight course corrections rather than major departures from what’s been established.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

6 Comments

  1. Excellent insights from Othello Meadows, CEO of Seventy-Five North Revitalization Corp in Omaha.

    I’ve been working on the civic effort to recruit Purpose Built Communities to St. Louis since late 2016. Had the opportunity to meet Othello at the 3-day 2016 Annual Meeting of Purpose Built Communities in Birmingham, and more recently to tour the Highland Neighborhood and to hear Othello’s terrific case study presentation on North Seventy-Five Revitalization Corp this past October in Omaha, at the 2017 Purpose Built Annual Meeting, hosted by Warren Buffett.

    Othello’s thesis here, that community & neighborhood development are constantly changing disciplines, is well taken. The work that he and his colleagues in Omaha are doing in the Highlander Neighborhood is well worth studying. I particularly like his description of it being a “community enhancement hub.”

    The Atlanta-based Purpose Built Communities, Inc. is a very robust national philanthropy, funded by Warren Buffett, Tom Cousins, and Julian Robertson. The Purpose Built model is currently underway in 18 cities, with two underway in Atlanta. The long-disinvested North St. Louis area is where the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) is presently building its $1.75-billion new 1 million square foot HQ, in the neighborhood where St. Louis hopes will become the next Purpose Built designee:

    “STL Should Model Atlanta’s Successful Urban Regeneration Model at East Lake.”
    Dick Fleming | Dec 10, 2016
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stl-should-model-atlantas-successful-urban-east-lake-dick-fleming

    –Dick Fleming, CEO, Community Development Ventures, Inc., St. Louis

    Reply
  2. Some Fantastic Insights and Reiterations – of the three treasures, I appreciate the “start” as you “finish” advice..even when deadlines loom and crushing delivery dates hover, to maintain the values of How in achieving the end goal is crucial…

    Reply
  3. Love the reflection on lessons learned at the stage you are in. This is valuable to all who are leading. Reflection is necessary to get better at moving foward, learning and growing. Best wishes going forward and thanks for role modeling an important leadership skill.

    Reply
  4. As a new resident of Omaha I am very grateful to have Mr. Meadows here in our city doing great things. Bravo!

    Reply
  5. Othello, your observations and reflections resonate with me. Each of these are important but today I particularly needed to be reminded of the power and importance of reflection. Too often that time is taken up by some urgent demand but at the expense of what may be even more important for the long run.

    Reply
  6. This article is a very insightful reflection of Othello’s outlook on the progress of 75 North. I look forward to seeing this project continue o flourish and become a staple of the Noth Omaha Community.

    Othello is a very wise man!

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

5 Ways to Democratize Access to Clean Energy Technology

California recently became the second state to pass a 100% clean energy standard, three years after Hawaii passed a similar law. As the fifth largest economy in the world, California has a tall order to fill in terms of making the transition to clean energy. How can California, and other states that wish to follow suit, fulfill this ambitious task? They will need to provide affordable, relevant, and accessible energy options to every one of its residents, prioritizing those who have historically been overlooked and left out of the clean energy conversation due to economic circumstance or social inequity.

7 Recommendations from Health and Transportation Focus Groups

Planners, engineers, and public health professionals all speak different languages. They may even use different terms to express similar ideas: for example, a planner may recommend tactical urbanism to improve neighborhood walkability, whereas an engineer may ascribe experimental countermeasure terminology to the same scenario, and a public health professional may view the solution in terms of an intervention. And community members may find all these terms unintelligible. In our focus groups, we heard that practitioners need to “get people on the same page” because of the differences we carry in our heads about transportation concepts.

A Research Toolkit for Building the Ultimate Urban Forest

As communities and municipalities around America are grappling with extreme weather events, it is even more vital to incorporate smart urban tree canopy and green infrastructure planning into all resiliency and climate change planning. Assessing your community’s current green infrastructure assets and deficits provides immediate information for maximizing your quality of living but also sets out the road map for how prepared your community may be for extreme weather events – from flooding to hurricanes to drought. Take advantage of the Vibrant Cities Lab site and any of the tools in this urban forestry “starter pack” or wade in by reaching out to the experts at the USDA Forest Service.