How Measuring Resource Use Can Lead to Policy Change
The city of Guimarães is the cradle of Portugal. Nestled in the North of the country, the ancient royal capital was selected as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2001. It was also designated as the European Capital of Culture for 2012, among other distinctions. Just as importantly, it prides itself on its efforts to grow into a national role model for sustainable urban living.
Guimarães is among six cities that embarked last year on a three-year Footprinting program spurred by ZERO, a leading environmental NGO in Portugal, in partnership with Global Footprint Network and the University of Aveiro. In March this year, Guimarães was the first to unveil the findings of the Footprint assessment led by Sara Moreno Pires, Ph.D., and her team at the Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences at the University of Aveiro.
The researchers found that in 2013, biocapacity per capita in Guimarães was 2.5 times the national average biocapacity per capita in Portugal. At the same time, the average ecological footprint of a resident in Guimarães was 3 percent lower than that of the average Portuguese citizen, at 3.76 global hectare (gha) per capita. The city’s lower than average carbon footprint per capita, compared to that of Portugal, largely accounts for the difference. This is due to a lower demand for housing, electricity, gas and other fuels compared to the national average. Carbon emissions represent 56 percent of the city’s ecological footprint, followed by cropland (26 percent) and fishing grounds (8 percent).
A regional comparison, on the other hand, shows a higher ecological footprint in Guimarães than in the rest of the North of the country, due mainly to a higher demand for food, transportation, and goods. Researchers pointed out that Guimarães residents are, on average, wealthier than the residents of other cities within the Ave sub-region.
Impacts of Measuring the Ecological Footprint
“The Ecological Footprint is critical because it provides us with information on the consumption side, which is typically a lot trickier to access than information on the production side. As such, it provides decision makers with information that they haven’t had before,” says Sara Moreno Pires. “Using the Ecological Footprint is very important with regard to mapping and understanding environmental challenges at the local level, with a view to changing behavior and policies,” she adds.
The project has been designed so that the Footprint and biocapacity assessment informs and guides local development policies. “We find that the Ecological Footprint data is very important to help us devise and strengthen policies because it tells us which sectors we need to focus our efforts and investments on – such as food and mobility,” states Jorge Cristino, Deputy Mayor’s Aide, International Affairs, Public Relations, Environment for the City of Guimarães.
The Footprint assessment recommends indeed that the municipality prioritize green strategies in the food and transportation sectors. Its authors encourage policies promoting sustainable transportation, including favoring public transit over individual cars. They also recommend awareness campaigns aimed at encouraging changes in the dietary choices of Guimarães’ residents towards lower animal protein-intensive meals (increasing the share of cereals, vegetables, and fruits), lower trophic-level fishes, and calorie-adequate diets.
Ultimately, transforming national policies is the goal of the program. “Our view is that we need to assess the Ecological Footprint and biocapacity of the different cities and regions around the country in order to develop a national system of governance that promotes equity and justice”, says Paulo Magalhães, City Footprinting Project Coordinator at ZERO.
Year three of the City Footprinting Project in Portugal is to be devoted to studying and proposing a change in the criteria for the distribution of government subsidies to municipalities. “By the end of the project, we intend to raise awareness at the Portuguese national government and Parliament, in order to change national legislation regarding how municipalities are funded so that their Ecological Footprint and biocapacity are included in the analysis,” explains Filipe Teles, Ph.D., Director for Regional Development and Urban Policies at the University of Aveiro.
Analysis and policy recommendations stemming from the City Footprinting Project will strive for territorial cohesion and equity. They will also aim at developing public policy instruments to preserve and improve the natural capital of each municipality and strengthen the sustainable management of the landscape and of natural resources.
In the meantime, Year two of the program is to focus on activating the public debate at the local level about sustainable living and sustainable development. Tools are to include online Footprint Calculators with city-specific data so that each resident can calculate her/his individual Footprint and become aware of the multiple human impacts on the environment. Workshops and roundtables are to be organized also with stakeholders from local governments, NGOs and civil society to discuss the implications of the Footprint assessment findings and evaluate options for moving forward.
The sustainability journey of Guimarães started in 2014 when its mayor, Domingos Bragança, requested an environmental diagnostic of the city from the University of Minho after he heard a speech by Sri Lankan physicist, academic and economist Mohan Munasinghe. Invited to a conference on environmental issues hosted by the city, the former Vice Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who shared the 2007 Peace Nobel Prize with Al Gore, had recommended that the city bring together a multi-stakeholder group to devise a plan for sustainable development.
Consequently, a Mission Structure was set up in 2015 with more than 200 individuals invited to participate with a clear mandate: to develop an effective strategy for the sustainable development of the municipality. Immediate impacts included mobilizing members of the public, deploying education programs on local environmental issues and sustainable living, as well as developing programs in soil restoration and green mobility.
Last year already, Guimarães was recognized as the most sustainable city in Portugal – a remarkable improvement from the 8th rank it earned in 2015.
The best is yet to come. After all, with the adoption of the Ecological Footprint analysis, Guimarães has taken the first step towards a globally consistent vision of sustainability. So have the cities of Almada, Bragança, Castelo Branco, Lagoa, and Vila Nova de Gaiahope. The hope is that the nation as a whole will follow suit.
Because “we cannot manage what we do not measure,” continued emphasis on monitoring pressures on the land as well as the impacts of consumption activities on land use, will need to be supported at the local and national levels to reinforce existing policies, introduce novel solutions, and evaluate their impacts through time.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.