How a Rush Hour Commuter Disruption Could Lead to Sustainable Resilience
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
This past Friday, BART, one of the primary mass transit systems in the San Francisco Bay Area experienced unplanned downtime during the morning commute. BART averages 360,000 riders a day, 150,000 of whom cross the Bay and would have been affected by the delay. Yet, by 9am, ridership was only 30,000 below normal. Clearly, most of the passengers didn’t get the message.
Communications of the downtime were shared over traditional media outlets and commuters were advised to work from home, carpool, or take advantage the additional buses that were put in service from other transit agencies. Coordination among transit agencies fared much better than coordination between transit agencies and their end users. Compared to service disruptions for terrorist threats, earthquakes, or other natural disasters, this was a very minor incident. Even so, it did underscore the need for much better communications.
Now, imagine a scenario where you’re a regular BART commuter on one of the affected lines and when you wake up, you have a text message, voicemail, and e-mail notifying you of the unplanned downtime along with alternate suggestions and instructions on where to find the latest information.
This is all possible today at ever-decreasing costs to implement. Using noSQL or real-time databases (e.g., Hadoop, Cassandra, MongoDB, Neo4J) greatly improves the ability of finding the affected users based on historical usage patterns and could do so in a matter of minutes or hours as opposed to the technologies of a few years ago that would take days or weeks to process such a query, if it could be done at all. This data analysis could be further expedited by in-memory computing (e.g., SAP HANA, Oracle Exadata). According to Gartner, the use of in-memory computing technology will rise three-fold by 2015.
We live in an era of relationships at scale – where organizations can now have 1-to-1 relationships with end users while simultaneously being able to communicate with all of their customers. A good example of this is the National Weather Service’s integration with Facebook and Apple that notifies geographically select individuals of impending disruptive weather events with no prior opt-in required. Overall, the data shared with digital services is increasingly relevant to more stakeholders, increasingly accessible through APIs, and increasingly ripe for big data analysis.
Today, a vast majority of commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area use a Clipper Card as a single form of payment across multiple transit agencies. Just tag your Clipper Card on a bus or turnstile and payment is made. For auditing purposes, Clipper also keeps track of when and where each payment occurs and Clipper has an e-mail address and phone number associated with each account.
After the couple hours it might take to extract the relevant data from a real-time database, it can be shared with a Reverse 911 system through an API call. Reverse 911 systems have been deployed in cities throughout North America and are capable of placing landline phone calls to geographically select individuals; newer systems can send SMS messages and e-mails as well. With the BART collision happening at 2:35 a.m., calls, texts, and e-mails could start flowing before most people get out of bed—which should be plenty of time to boost that 30,000 number to something much more resilient.
We may not live in the age of the Jetsons, but there’s no reason our public transit infrastructure can’t live with us in digital harmony. With the technology available today, public transportation can become resilient infrastructure where downtime is effectively communicated in a scalable way. After all, if a city wants to be resilient, then it must also be digital.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).
As extreme weather conditions become the new normal—from floods in Baton Rouge and Venice to wildfires in California, we need to clean and save stormwater for future use while protecting communities from flooding and exposure to contaminated water. Changing how we manage stormwater has the potential to preserve access to water for future generations; prevent unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and damage to communities; and increase investments in green, climate-resilient infrastructure, with a focus on communities where these kinds of investments are most needed.
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?