Guiding Green and Smart Urban Development in China
In the lead up to last month’s historic Paris climate summit, China announced that it would “embark on a new pattern of urbanization.” With cities consuming three-quarters of the China’s energy, the fate of this initiative carries global significance.
What will China’s “new pattern of urbanization” look like? China Development Bank Capital, in partnership with Energy Innovation and Energy Foundation, recently introduced a set of guidelines to help define China’s new model for urbanization. The Green & Smart Urban Development Guidelines capture the most important lessons learned from global experience on how to build a sustainable city. These guidelines are in line with China’s new central government goals and designed with practicality as a priority to suit China’s rapid urbanization.
Every city can be green and smart. The 12 Green Guidelines focus on the importance of basic land-use and infrastructural upgrades such as public transit, renewable energy, and water efficiency. The Six Smart Guidelines look at how smart technologies can optimize these urban systems. While few cities have truly explored the full integration of both green and smart, our research shows that it will be a necessary integration for leading cities in the 21st century. The Green & Smart Guidelines also come with two with comprehensive case studies – Hammarby in Stockholm and the Pearl District in Portland.
The 12 Green Guidelines are based on the principle that a few key actions taken by urban planners are critical in creating environmentally, economically, and socially thriving cities. The graphic above explains our approach in incorporating good policy design principles into each of the 12 Green Guidelines in order to ensure they are beneficial, measureable and practical. Designed as a tool for cities, the guidelines also provide quantitative benchmarks to help urban planners and others in city government fulfill the criteria.
For the Six Smart Guidelines, we look at the potential role for smart technologies in further advancing these social, economic, and environmental benefits. Many of these smart technologies have proven business models and payback periods, such as smart parking or building management systems. Applied innovatively, these technologies can increase efficiency and provide a range of benefits. For example, sensors in Barcelona’s irrigation system are helping the city more effectively care for its greenery while making money back through water savings. Smart technologies can also improve public services: cities like Stockholm are using advanced internet platforms to allow residents to register for school, scan radon gas levels, and even book weddings.
What do these principles look like in action? Take the example of the Liuyun Xiaoqu district in Guangzhou. In the place of roads, the neighborhood developed extensive walking and cycling paths. Even as vehicle ownership has risen in the city, the neighborhood has instituted car control policies, creating car-free sections of the development to protect the pedestrian culture. Here the importance of interactions between different guidelines is visible: the lack of cars does not hinder Liuyun Xiaoqu’s residents because of the introduction of mixed-use zoning. The ground floor of buildings that were formerly just apartment blocks has been converted into a wide range of shops which are always bustling with customers. Because such a wide range of goods and services is available within walking distance, residents can live a high-quality life without depending on cars.
The social, economic, and environmental benefits of the Green & Smart Guidelines are multiplied when all of the principles are applied together. A tour of one of the most sustainable developments in the world, the Pearl District in Portland, provides Chinese cities with an example of what such comprehensive sustainable development can look like. Before developing, both districts set environmental goals covering all critical elements of sustainable urban form, transportation, and energy & resources as outlined in the 12 Green Guidelines. By baking sustainability into their urban planning, the Pearl District made it part of its identity and ensured that all development would comply with the initial goals.
On top of the critical foundation of sustainable urban form and transportation, promoting non-motorized transit and public transit like Liuyun Xiaoqu, the Pearl incentivized new development to embrace the latest green technology. This vision materialized across the district and is best exemplified in one micro-neighborhood, the Brewery Blocks. This set of seven blocks is composed of all LEED certified buildings. The certification was achieved through the innovative incorporation of technology into the development: solar PV arrays line the façade of some buildings, while another hosts a district cooling facility providing cooling for the all the blocks, and all boast low-flow water fixtures for maximal water efficiency.
The Pearl’s sustainable redevelopment in line with the Green & Smart Guidelines has brought a host of benefits. The density of the district has quadrupled while easy access to parks and public transit allows for a high quality of life in the area. In a 2008 survey of Pearl residents, three quarters of residents said they drove less since moving to the Pearl; 58 percent said they usually walk, bike, or take transit to work. The district’s economy is also flourishing, driven by an influx of young, creative professionals. Between 1994 and 2010, job growth increased by 54 percent, average salary increased by 41 percent, and land market value increased by 690 percent, inflation adjusted.
There has been immense interest in China to set in motion sustainable urbanization patterns. We hope that the Green & Smart Guidelines and accompanying case studies can offer clarity on the path forward for local governments and urban developers. This is the moment for China to capitalize on a critical opportunity to make its cities ‘great’ through green and smart urban growth.
About the Authors:
Lili Pike is an Urban Sustainability Fellow at Energy Innovation in San Francisco. Her work at Energy Innovation focuses on raising awareness on the imperative of sustainable design principles. She is a graduate of Harvard University where she majored in Social Studies, with a minor in Energy & Environment, and a citation in Mandarin. She wrote an honors thesis on eco-city development in China and South Africa.
CC Huang is a Policy Analyst for Energy Innovation’s Urban Sustainability program area. Prior to joining Energy Innovation, she worked at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on international best practices of energy governance. She has also worked with the Natural Resources Defense Council in their Beijing office. CC received an MPA in Economics and Public Policy from the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University with a certificate in Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy. She also graduated magna cum laude with a B.A. from George Washington University in International Affairs with a minor in Philosophy. CC is fluent in Mandarin Chinese, having studied international affairs and philosophy at Peking University and was a recipient of the U.S. State Department’s Critical Language Scholarship.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
The best nature-based solutions on urban industrial lands are those that are part of a corporate citizenship or conservation strategy like DTE’s or Phillips66. By integrating efforts such as tree plantings, restorations, or pollinator gardens into a larger strategy, companies begin to mainstream biodiversity into their operations. When they crosswalk the effort to other CSR goals like employee engagement, community relations, and/or workforce development, like the CommuniTree initiative, the projects become more resilient.
Air quality in urban residential communities near industrial facilities will not be improved by nature alone. But nature can contribute to the solution, and while doing so, bring benefits including recreation, education, and an increased sense of community pride. As one tool to combat disparate societal outcomes, nature is accessible, affordable and has few, if any, downsides.
I spoke last week to Adrian Benepe, former commissioner for the NYC Parks Department and currently the Senior Vice President and Director of National Programs at The Trust for Public Land.
We discussed a lot of things – the increased use of parks in the era of COVID-19, the role parks have historically played – and currently play – in citizens’ first amendment right to free speech and protests, access & equity for underserved communities, the coming budget shortfalls and how they might play out in park systems.
I wanted to pull out the discussion we had about funding for parks and share Adrian’s thoughts with all of you, as I think it will be most timely and valuable as we move forward with new budgets and new realities.
There is a risk of further widening the gap between so-called ‘knowledge workers’ able to do their jobs remotely and afford to move, and those with place-based employment who cannot. Beyond that, retreating residents might take the very identity and uniqueness of the places they abandon with them.
Nurturing the community-resident bond could be an antidote to these dismaying departures, and new research sheds light on how. A recent report by the Urban Institute and commissioned by the Knight Foundation surveyed 11,000 residents of 26 U.S. metro areas to uncover what amenities created a “sense of attachment and connection to their city or community.” Three key recommendations emerged in Smart Cities Dive’s synopsis of the results.