Finding Fresh: How Smart Farming is Impacting Smart Cities
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Statistically, less than two percent of Californians feed the other 98%. In addition, those same Californians, those feeding the 98%, are also providing specialty items such as delicious strawberries, tasty almonds, and enchanting wines to a good chunk of consumers of those items around country and the world. One reason they are able to provide so much for so many is that California farmers have embraced technology to increase yields and conserve precious and expensive resources like water, energy and land. Yields have been increasing for decades due to the ingenuity of the growers and their partners in both industry and research institutions, who have helped make American farms, ranches and vineyards some of the most efficient and effective staple and luxury crop producers in the world. Today, as cities and their inhabitants become “smarter”, they will increasingly be fed by “smarter” farms.
California is currently seeing a spillover of the newest technological innovations from Silicon Valley, into the Central, San Joaquin and Salinas Valleys; adding to the existing base of advancements in precision irrigation, spectral imaging, genomics, environmental, animal and plant sciences, and dozens of other areas of practice. Many of the applications in use in today’s cities will likely find their place on the farm or vineyard, especially when it comes to IoT (Internet of Things) technologies.
The smart city is meeting the smart farm, but the nature of technology necessitates this relationship will be symbiotic not unidirectional. Increasingly, the smart farm will be impacting the smart city. What could be a more significant impact than solving the problem of getting food to ever-growing urban centers which are increasingly dependent on transportation and logistics to feed their millions? Perhaps history can be instructive.
Downtowns Used to be Farmlands
If one drives out of any metropolitan area, it doesn’t take too long to get past suburban sprawl to fields, and eventually working farms. This is true of even a short drive from Manhattan in New York City. If you go back a few decades, the farms that fed New York City were right across the Hudson in the “Garden State” of New Jersey. A couple of centuries prior to that, they were right on the island itself! The area around what is 80th street today was still farms and fields in the 1830s according to archival maps.
There are many benefits to having farms so close to downtown: fresh food is more available, reduced transportation demands, greater opportunities for recycling water and waste, and better use of open space. The biggest payoff we see today is the ability for cities to sustain themselves in the event of disaster, reducing the dependence on having food trucked in. Some sources estimate as little as a three-day supply of fresh food exists in most urban centers. Can today’s smart farms build on these best practices from prior generations?
Bridging the Urban and Rural Smart Farms
Today, we see more and more farms taking up city skylines with rooftop gardens and greenhouses: Hydroponic and aeroponic farms are being built inside of old warehouses, LED lighting is filtered to emit only those portions of the light spectrum necessary to produce energy efficient photosynthesis, and climate controlled environments can sustain multiple growing seasons and eliminate the need for pesticides. It has been reported up to 10 times the amount of lettuce can be grown indoors as compared to traditional field farming. That’s a lot of salad for health-conscious urbanites. Nevertheless, despite some awesome projections, vertical farming is not going to be able to feed the world’s fast-growing urban populations. At least not today.
Fortunately, the IoT revolution on farms in traditional growing environments such as California’s Central Valley is contributing to higher productivity with greater resource efficiency. And as farms become more automated and connected, they will be virtually connected to urban centers. The more that happens, the more demand there will be for data about food and ways to ensure transparency in how it is grown, processed, and shipped. So as technology is enabling the urban farms, it is transforming the rural farms bring the two closer together than ever before.
The Future of Agtech IoT (Internet of Tomatoes) and Smart Farming
As technology makes producers more efficient, they will be able to do more with less resources, and may be able to move food growing operations closer to the consumer. Perhaps we will see smaller growing operations popping up in suburbs that are super-efficient and ag-tech intensive. Perhaps they will be linked to urban rooftop and greenhouse farms, as well as connected to refrigerators and pantries in homes and restaurants, growing on demand with zero waste. We may even get to the point where the whole cycle of production to consumption is a closed hyper-connected, hyper-efficient loop. Toilet to tomato to tabletop doesn’t sound that appetizing, but it could very well describe the most efficient cycle of food production and consumption since those farms in Upper Manhattan disappeared a couple of centuries ago.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).
As extreme weather conditions become the new normal—from floods in Baton Rouge and Venice to wildfires in California, we need to clean and save stormwater for future use while protecting communities from flooding and exposure to contaminated water. Changing how we manage stormwater has the potential to preserve access to water for future generations; prevent unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and damage to communities; and increase investments in green, climate-resilient infrastructure, with a focus on communities where these kinds of investments are most needed.
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?