Innovative Finance Models for Sustainable Cities of the Future
City budget deficits are far from rare. San Jose, Chicago, Phoenix and Las Vegas are just a few examples of cities confronting likely shortfalls in the upcoming fiscal year. A wave of cost-cutting, and in many cases conflicting, policy drivers awaits the sustainability champions of US cities.
With business starting to take sustainability seriously, not only is there a commercial opportunity in implementing city sustainability strategies, but also a ‘read-across’ in terms of public and private sector strategies. The key question is how to find effective models of financing that will meet the objectives of both public and private stakeholders when it comes to sustainable cities.
Tax Incremental Financing (TIF)
A new report, Investor Ready Cities released by Siemens, PwC and law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner, aims to help cities think about new ways to fund their infrastructure projects – by exploring traditional funding models like taxes and user fees and by attracting private investors.
For example, tax incremental financing (TIF) is an innovative a way to fund urban infrastructure projects. TIF can be a valuable public finance tool for city redevelopment projects. Establishing a TIF program allows the city to invest selected new property tax dollars into the neighborhood instead of into the city's General Fund, for a defined period (typically 20 years). TIF funds are used to leverage public funds to promote private sector activity in a targeted district or area or supporting sustainable community. TIF districts are typically established in areas with redevelopment potential and enable municipalities to use anticipated growth to raise money to finance essential infrastructure improvements by leveraging public sector bonds based on future tax gains.
The 2013 Sustainable Communities Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Designation and Financing Law passed by the Maryland General Assembly as House Bill 613 uses TIF supported bonds in a Sustainable Community for:
- Historic preservation and rehabilitation;
- Environmental remediation, demolition and site preparation;
- Parking lots, facilities and structures of any type for public or private use;
- Highways and transit services that support Sustainable Communities;
- Affordable or mixed income housing; and
- Storm water management and storm drain facilities.
Crowd and micro funding projects are not unheard of in the social cause community. Kiva has enabled developing world entrepreneurship through microloans since 2005. But until recently, crowdfunding hadn't really been applied to creating businesses and sparking innovation around the triple bottom line of sustainability – people, planet, and profit. Crowdfunding – popularized by platforms such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo, provides a way for many people to pool resources, typically through online donations, toward a larger goal.
For example, Missouri in their bid to grow and support Kansas City’s B-Cycle program, and deliver infrastructure improvements to the bike share system, recently launched a crowd funding campaign on the Neighbor.ly platform. The goal was to run simultaneous mini-campaigns, ranging between $50,000 and $250,000, to bring one to five stations to 10 different Kansas City neighborhoods. The current campaign is the second crowd funding effort by B-Cycle. The first gathered funding for the purpose of maintaining existing stations.
In February 2014, Binghampton, a neighborhood on the east side of Memphis, Tennessee broke ground on the Hampline: a two-mile cycle track that will connect Binghampton to nearby parks and trails. While the bulk of the money for Hampline came through the usual avenues of city grants and foundations, the last $69,000 of the $4.5 million project was raised via ioby, a crowdfunding platform that’s helping to launch environmental and community development initiatives around the country.
Green Revolving Fund (GRF)
Energy efficiency saves money. But there is always the challenge of justifying and securing the upfront capital often needed to implement efficiency projects. The Green Revolving Fund (GRF) model is emerging as an effective solution. The model is increasingly common among higher education institutions and state governments, and it is gaining traction with healthcare facilities, municipalities and businesses. A GRF is an internal investment vehicle that provides financing to parties within an organization for implementing energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other sustainability projects that generate cost savings. These savings are tracked and used to replenish the fund for the next round of green investments, thus establishing a sustainable funding cycle while cutting operating costs and reducing environmental impacts.
For example, the City of Ann Arbor established The Municipal Energy Fund in 1998 to be a self-sustaining source of funds for investment in energy-efficient retrofits at city facilities, so the City could continually reduce its operating costs over time. The Energy Fund is financed by re-investing the funds saved through energy efficiency measures into new energy saving projects. In 1988, the City utilized its municipal bonding authority to fund a $1.4 million Energy Bond which enabled the City to implement energy efficiency measures in 30 City facilities. The payments for this ten-year bond were generated through energy cost savings. With the bond paid off in 1998, the City chose not to eliminate the bond payment line item in the annual budget but rather to reduce it by 50% to $100,000. This money was then used to finance the new Municipal Energy Fund.
Vision for the Future
Cities are hubs for ideas, commerce, culture, science, social development and innovation. At their best, cities have enabled people to advance socially and economically. The challenges cities face can be overcome in ways that allow them to continue to thrive and grow, while improving resource use and promoting sustainable development. The vision is to give people a tool to build their own city. They can use these finance models as a vehicle to organize, invest and manage and be a part of development around them. It is going to create better cities that are more connected and relevant to local community.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Progress needs to be made in the evaluation of approaches to developing resilient communities. The evidence base for the effectiveness of these approaches is currently lagging behind practice. Funding for evaluation is generally too short-term to offer scope for capturing the developmental nature of community resilience related activity and evaluations on wider outcomes are lacking.
Disaster resilience is frequently pursued separately by the public and private sectors in the US. Federal, state, and local governments take it as their role to execute disaster preparedness and emergency response for their populations; however, economic recovery is often not addressed. The public sector does not necessarily engage businesses, nor does it seem to plan for the economic “reboot” required after a disaster, resulting in business disruption continuing for much longer.
The clout of local governments should never be underestimated. When Xcel Energy recently made the monumental decision to pursue a 100% carbon reduction goal by 2050, Chairman and CEO Ben Fowke noted that local communities are already leading the charge.