Innovative Finance Models for Sustainable Cities of the Future
City budget deficits are far from rare. San Jose, Chicago, Phoenix and Las Vegas are just a few examples of cities confronting likely shortfalls in the upcoming fiscal year. A wave of cost-cutting, and in many cases conflicting, policy drivers awaits the sustainability champions of US cities.
With business starting to take sustainability seriously, not only is there a commercial opportunity in implementing city sustainability strategies, but also a ‘read-across’ in terms of public and private sector strategies. The key question is how to find effective models of financing that will meet the objectives of both public and private stakeholders when it comes to sustainable cities.
Tax Incremental Financing (TIF)
A new report, Investor Ready Cities released by Siemens, PwC and law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner, aims to help cities think about new ways to fund their infrastructure projects – by exploring traditional funding models like taxes and user fees and by attracting private investors.
For example, tax incremental financing (TIF) is an innovative a way to fund urban infrastructure projects. TIF can be a valuable public finance tool for city redevelopment projects. Establishing a TIF program allows the city to invest selected new property tax dollars into the neighborhood instead of into the city’s General Fund, for a defined period (typically 20 years). TIF funds are used to leverage public funds to promote private sector activity in a targeted district or area or supporting sustainable community. TIF districts are typically established in areas with redevelopment potential and enable municipalities to use anticipated growth to raise money to finance essential infrastructure improvements by leveraging public sector bonds based on future tax gains.
The 2013 Sustainable Communities Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Designation and Financing Law passed by the Maryland General Assembly as House Bill 613 uses TIF supported bonds in a Sustainable Community for:
- Historic preservation and rehabilitation;
- Environmental remediation, demolition and site preparation;
- Parking lots, facilities and structures of any type for public or private use;
- Highways and transit services that support Sustainable Communities;
- Affordable or mixed income housing; and
- Storm water management and storm drain facilities.
Crowd and micro funding projects are not unheard of in the social cause community. Kiva has enabled developing world entrepreneurship through microloans since 2005. But until recently, crowdfunding hadn’t really been applied to creating businesses and sparking innovation around the triple bottom line of sustainability – people, planet, and profit. Crowdfunding – popularized by platforms such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo, provides a way for many people to pool resources, typically through online donations, toward a larger goal.
For example, Missouri in their bid to grow and support Kansas City’s B-Cycle program, and deliver infrastructure improvements to the bike share system, recently launched a crowd funding campaign on the Neighbor.ly platform. The goal was to run simultaneous mini-campaigns, ranging between $50,000 and $250,000, to bring one to five stations to 10 different Kansas City neighborhoods. The current campaign is the second crowd funding effort by B-Cycle. The first gathered funding for the purpose of maintaining existing stations.
In February 2014, Binghampton, a neighborhood on the east side of Memphis, Tennessee broke ground on the Hampline: a two-mile cycle track that will connect Binghampton to nearby parks and trails. While the bulk of the money for Hampline came through the usual avenues of city grants and foundations, the last $69,000 of the $4.5 million project was raised via ioby, a crowdfunding platform that’s helping to launch environmental and community development initiatives around the country.
Green Revolving Fund (GRF)
Energy efficiency saves money. But there is always the challenge of justifying and securing the upfront capital often needed to implement efficiency projects. The Green Revolving Fund (GRF) model is emerging as an effective solution. The model is increasingly common among higher education institutions and state governments, and it is gaining traction with healthcare facilities, municipalities and businesses. A GRF is an internal investment vehicle that provides financing to parties within an organization for implementing energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other sustainability projects that generate cost savings. These savings are tracked and used to replenish the fund for the next round of green investments, thus establishing a sustainable funding cycle while cutting operating costs and reducing environmental impacts.
For example, the City of Ann Arbor established The Municipal Energy Fund in 1998 to be a self-sustaining source of funds for investment in energy-efficient retrofits at city facilities, so the City could continually reduce its operating costs over time. The Energy Fund is financed by re-investing the funds saved through energy efficiency measures into new energy saving projects. In 1988, the City utilized its municipal bonding authority to fund a $1.4 million Energy Bond which enabled the City to implement energy efficiency measures in 30 City facilities. The payments for this ten-year bond were generated through energy cost savings. With the bond paid off in 1998, the City chose not to eliminate the bond payment line item in the annual budget but rather to reduce it by 50% to $100,000. This money was then used to finance the new Municipal Energy Fund.
Vision for the Future
Cities are hubs for ideas, commerce, culture, science, social development and innovation. At their best, cities have enabled people to advance socially and economically. The challenges cities face can be overcome in ways that allow them to continue to thrive and grow, while improving resource use and promoting sustainable development. The vision is to give people a tool to build their own city. They can use these finance models as a vehicle to organize, invest and manage and be a part of development around them. It is going to create better cities that are more connected and relevant to local community.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.
While the outlook for the environment may often seem bleak, there are many proven methods already available for cities to make their energy systems and other infrastructure not only more sustainable, but cheaper and more resilient at the same time. This confluence of benefits will drive investments in clean, efficient energy, transportation, and water infrastructure that will enable cities to realize their sustainability goals.
Given that many of the policy mechanisms that impact cities’ ability to boost sustainability are implemented at the state or federal level, municipalities should look to their own operations to implement change. Cities can lead as a major market player, for example, by converting their own fleets to zero emission electric vehicles, investing in more robust and efficient water facilities, procuring clean power, and requiring municipal buildings to be LEED certified.