From Digital Divide to Digital Equity
March 12 marked the 25th anniversary of the creation of the World Wide Web by Sir Tim Berners Lee. The web has enabled people around the globe to innovate in ways previously unimagined, collaborate with ease across oceans, and spur revolution. Imagine explaining the history and wonders of the web to someone who has never heard of it. Your narrative might include the early days of dial up, receiving AOL compact discs in the mail, the sudden ubiquity of email in school and the workplace, the rise and fall of Napster, applying for jobs online, no longer reading the newspaper on paper, social media, and working in the cloud.
Thoroughly impressed, and at this point also looking to the sky in search of the cloud you are working in, your WWW novitiate might then ask if everyone can access the web. How would you explain that in one of the richest nations on earth, home to global centers of innovation, commerce, media, and higher learning that the answer to this question depends upon a person’s location, age, race, income, education level, and what kind of access they are willing to settle for?
Significant progress has been made in addressing the digital divide since the phenomena was introduced to the nation by President Bill Clinton in his 2000 State of the Union Address. In 1997, just 18% of US households had access to the Internet. The most recent data from the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project indicates that 76% of Americans 18 and over now use the Internet at home. The vast majority of these home Internet users have adopted high-speed home broadband, the technology that makes full online engagement possible (92% based on 70% of home Internet users being broadband adopters). In fact, the Census Bureau’s 2011 Current Population Survey reveals that 98% of households are located in areas that have access to broadband. For reasons ranging from affordability of home subscriptions to views about the utility of broadband in the home, an astounding one hundred million Americans have yet to adopt this technology.
A mapping project by the Open Technology Institute highlighted in Atlantic Cities paints a rather bleak picture of home broadband adoption in several major American cities. The maps show census tracts in most of the cities, more often than not in low-income neighborhoods, where adoption of home broadband sits at 0-20%. Frequently abutting these pockets of incredibly low adoption are census tracts where adoption appears to be in better shape but still lags behind the nationwide adoption level of 70%. These are the same urban geographies that are the focus of concerted effort by residents, schools, institutes of higher education, non-profit organizations, and levels of government from municipal to federal to improve educational outcomes, create on-ramps to 21st century career tracks, and promote health and wellness. Imagine setting your sights on a goal in one of these domains only to be told that in order to move forward, you will need to depend on your smartphone and whatever other Internet access you manage to come across. Millions of low-income youth and adults whose budgets cannot absorb the expense of home broadband are being asked to do just that.
The digital divide might now be better understood as a murky digital chasm full of rapidly evolving state and federal laws governing the telecommunications industry, mega mergers, and pressing concerns about the end of “net neutrality”. Those incurring the greatest cost while all of this plays out are the 100 million people working hard to make due with sub optimal access via mobile devices, 3 hour waits for 30 minute slots at public libraries, and free WiFi at McDonald’s and coffee shops. Limited, second tier access must no longer hinder their educational, professional, health, and civic ambitions. To achieve equity in access to resources and opportunities, we must move past the digital divide and problem solve in new ways to achieve digital equity.
With that said, we need a coherent strategy to integrate home broadband adoption efforts into the facets of city planning and urban policy that focus on creating neighborhoods, cities, and metro areas of opportunity for all people. This will require that cities aggressively pursue adoption among low-income households in the near term while simultaneously digging into the long game of securing access to the future-proof fiber optic infrastructure they need to compete in the 21st century global innovation economy.
While some cities have fully embraced the short-term challenge of connecting all residents to affordable high-speed broadband in the home, far more remain on the sidelines. Those who are ready to make this a major priority could learn a great deal from cities whose work is already in motion. Some partner with telecommunications companies to increase enrollment in subsidized home broadband subscriptions. Where affordable options are lacking or nonexistent, citizens have increasingly taken matters into their own hands and built mesh networks to serve their neighborhoods. Some cities have gathered up the financial and political capital to offer Fiber to the Home (FTTH), either by building their own fiber optic networks or developing creative strategies to activate existing infrastructure. We stand to learn a great deal from these and other cases about how the unique collection of assets, interests, and needs spanning a city’s neighborhoods and institutions can advance home broadband adoption.
Carefully crafted partnerships with broadband service providers and the installation of neighborhood based mesh networks may be the most direct short-term path to increasing home broadband adoption in many cities. However, when thinking through what American cities need to compete on the world stage and afford all residents every opportunity possible now and in the years to come, it is becoming increasingly apparent that fiber optic infrastructure is the best bet. An investment of between $50-$90 billion (80% of which would be spent on labor, and thus invested directly in jobs within the local community) would connect most households in America and support high-speed Internet needs for the next 40-50 years. Several recent announcements, one from Google and another from the Federal Communications Commission suggest that a fiber future is gaining momentum nationwide.
Ultimately, the path to digital equity will require the development of robust economic models that maximize the short- and long-term human outcomes of home broadband adoption. These models will enable us to better understand how increasing home broadband adoption can act as an economic multiplier on local, state, and federal investments that aim to make the ecology of the city one of opportunity for all people. In so doing, cities will ensure that all Americans can thrive as citizens of the 21st century.
Featured image courtesy of wise at Flickr Creative Commons. Some rights reserved.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.