Developing Resilient Communities within Cities
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
The challenges brought by the global financial crisis of 2008 and the resulting impact on local communities across the UK has meant an increased focus on the role of community resilience.
But what is community resilience?
In our work, we have considered community resilience broadly, as being the ability of a community to withstand and recover after an event or crisis. Other perspectives also draw on this idea of the ability of communities to anticipate threats, and to respond, adapt and grow when confronted by such a threat.
Particularly influential to our work has been this definition by the Glasgow Centre for Population Health:
Growing Interest in Community Resilience
Here in the UK, since the financial crisis hit, we have seen reforms to our welfare system and cutbacks to public services because of sustained reductions in public spending. As a result, many local communities across the UK have experienced significant economic and social ‘shocks’.
As we see in other countries around the world, the UK also has an ageing population and changing job opportunities, with a growing numbers of self-employed, entrepreneurs and “gig” workers. Income inequality in the UK is now higher than in any other large country in Europe. It is against this background that we have seen an increasing interest in the potential for community resilience to support people and communities in the face of these social and economic challenges.
We recently published a report that considered evidence for different approaches to building community resilience, and the potential impact of these approaches within our local communities in the North West of England.
The different approaches to building community resilience we included were:
- Encouraging social network development (e.g. innovative community schemes and supporting volunteering)
- Promoting community governance and levels of control (e.g. community budgets)
- Economic approaches to developing community resilience (e.g. local jobs for local people, local supply chains)
- Enhancing environmental assets (e.g. good housing and green spaces)
In keeping with the Urban Sustainability theme of Meeting of the Minds, here we focus on what we identified about the role of environmental approaches in building and sustaining community resilience.
The Role of Environmental Approaches
Environmental assets, reducing environmental harm and enhancing the natural environment are an essential feature of resilient communities. Social cohesion, and both physical and mental health and wellbeing are protected and improved by building on environmental assets.
Reports by the World Health Organization, and in the UK, the former Sustainable Development Commission and the Sustainable Development Unit, have made recommendations for action including the need for more work around:
- Green space and urban open space areas, planning and design, housing and air pollution
- Improving shared spaces and facilitating chance interactions between citizens, civic pride, and active travel
- Ensuring improved standards in the rented housing sector
Transport systems and increased mobility are not always good for social interaction.
The damage that traffic does to social systems in urban areas has been described as one of the most serious of all the problems it causes. Traffic can suppress casual conversations, children’s play, and other street-based social life. For example, in the city of Bristol in the UK, research found that residents of busy streets have less than one quarter the number of local friends than those living on similar streets with little traffic.
Natural spaces help increase social contact and social integration, especially in poorer neighbourhoods.
Access to a natural environment, especially trees and grass, provides a meeting place for all ages and has a positive effect on social interaction and cohesion for different age groups. As well as increased neighbourliness, the presence of nearby natural spaces may also been related to reductions in crime. Actions that have been proposed include increased investment in the creation of quality green spaces, focussing on deprived areas.
Community land trusts, a form of community-led housing, can deliver affordable local housing and other benefits.
Community land trusts have emerged as an innovative environmental approach, involving alliances of local people working together to buy and manage land for affordable housing and other community assets (e.g. community pubs, shops, cafes, allotments, orchards and workspaces). In our local county of Cheshire in England, community land trusts have been promoted as a model that puts communities in the driving seat and is seen as part of the process of encouraging communities to become involved in Neighbourhood Plans and to engage with local housing and related issues.
People’s homes and neighbourhoods provide the health setting for most of their life.
NHS England, the body that oversees the National Health Service in England, are working with housing developments to shape the health of communities. They are focusing on improving health through the built environment and rethinking how healthcare services can be delivered. In March 2016, NHS England announced ten demonstrator Healthy New Town sites, one of which is Halton Lea, Runcorn, an industrial town in the county of Cheshire in England. The development intends to regenerate the area into a thriving community hub, with new opportunities for social and community activities, healthy retail provision, integrated housing, health and social care provision. NHS England is focussing on developing a health and wellbeing ecosystem, with people at the heart of it, and an infrastructure that supports wellbeing and health. This involves the implementation of a new Halton Hospital and Wellbeing Campus, where healthcare services, along with facilities for leisure, exercise and socialising, will be co-located.
100 Resilient Cities is helping more cities to build resilience to the physical, social, and economic challenges of the 21st century.
100 Resilient Cities was pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation in recognition of the fact that as well as acute shocks such as flooding, cities face chronic stresses that weaken the fabric of a city on a day-to-day or cyclical basis. Examples include ageing infrastructure, homelessness, and inefficient public transportation systems. The Foundation assists cities to develop a resilience strategy by building on existing activities, processes and projects.
The Happy City Index can be used to provide a progress report on the conditions for wellbeing at a city level.
The Happy City Index has been used, for example; to encourage decision makers to consider how to use housing design to fight social isolation. Indicators include accommodation, public transport and green space.
Dementia friendly communities work to help overcome difficulties faced by people living with dementia.
People with dementia and their carers face everyday challenges in living well. Dementia friendly communities work to help overcome difficulties in using technology, getting appropriate service in shops, banks and post offices and in using transport, going on holiday and maintaining social contact and hobbies and ensuring safe, accessible physical environments.
An important feature of community resilience is a thriving local economy, which provides good local jobs for local people.
Actions to promote resilience include schemes to revitalise high street shopping areas; support for small businesses in poorer areas; purchasing policies that create local jobs; the provision of education, training, and job opportunities for young people; and the promotion of responsible employment practices (such as the living wage) and health at work.
In summary, there is much that can be done to promote resilient communities through environmental approaches, starting with providing more green spaces, affordable good quality housing, tackling air pollution, improving shared spaces and promoting active travel, especially in areas of deprivation, with a consideration of innovative approaches. For this to be effective there needs to be greater coordination among local authorities and partnerships with public and private stakeholders to develop resilience strategies. This will allow frameworks to be developed to inform thinking on how economies and environments can promote resilience to maximum effect.
Progress needs to be made in the evaluation of approaches to developing resilient communities. The evidence base for the effectiveness of these approaches is currently lagging behind practice. Funding for evaluation is generally too short-term to offer scope for capturing the developmental nature of community resilience related activity and evaluations on wider outcomes are lacking.
This is part of a larger piece of work, commissioned by Champs (the Cheshire & Merseyside Public Health collaborative).
The full Resilient Communities reports are available via the following links:
Or from: email@example.com
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?
When planning for new mobilities, it is important to be a little skeptical. Advocates often exaggerate the benefits and overlook significant costs. Here’s an example. Optimists predict that autonomous cars will reduce traffic congestion, crash risk, energy consumption and pollution emissions, but to achieve these benefits they require dedicated lanes for platooning (many vehicles driving close together at relatively high speeds). When should communities dedicate special lanes for the exclusive use of autonomous vehicles? How much should users pay for the privilege? How should this be enforced? Who will be liable if a high-speed platoon crashes, resulting in a multi-vehicle pile-up?
Infrastructure is on the tip of every mayor’s tongue. It’s no wonder, with billions in federal funding on the table for the first time in a generation and rapidly compounding infrastructure needs. American Rescue Plan dollars represent a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to invest in communities, support resident priorities, and move the needle on racial equity all at the same time. Parks and playgrounds exist in an ideal sweet spot in each of these areas, and cities should consider making investments in these vital pieces of community infrastructure as part of their recovery and resilience strategies.