COVID-19 Presents an Opportunity to Build Back Stronger Cities

By Tripp Borstel, Director, Sustainability Solutions, ENGIE Impact

Tripp Borstel is the head of transformation and leads the public sector practice for ENGIE Impact. His obsession is for the myriad of ways organizations and cities can accelerate strategy implementation. He sharpened his craft in management consulting roles at Blu Skye Sustainability Consulting, PwC and the Katzenbach Center.


Who will you meet?

Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.

Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.


 

It’s been nearly a year since the coronavirus pandemic started, and in that time, we’ve been through the ups and downs of shortages, closures, re-openings, re-closures, and endless proclamations and debates about what comes next. But there’s another crisis still affecting the globe, and that’s the ongoing climate crisis. Climate action has been the topic of many years of debate about what should be done to prepare for and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Interestingly, many cities are leveraging lessons and actions of the COVID-19 crisis to refocus on and drive ambitious sustainability and resiliency strategies. These cities are implementing a “build back better” strategy that ultimately will benefit some of the most vulnerable groups affected by both climate impacts and COVID-19. These strategies can strengthen building infrastructure, create good jobs for those who need them most, and rapidly accelerate cities’ carbon emissions reduction goals.

By and large, cities have felt the impacts of the pandemic more intensely than rural and suburban areas (90% of reported COVID cases are in urban areas), exposing the inequalities in health, income, and opportunity even within the cities themselves. And like coronavirus, climate change is a risk multiplier for cities, which are on the front lines of managing impacts to citizens, communities, and businesses.

Last spring, I moderated a webinar in partnership with Meeting of the Minds, “Responding to Waves of Extreme Events: Long-Term and Short-Term Sustainability and Resiliency from Philly and Fayetteville.” I learned how these two cities were able to leverage their long-term sustainability planning to respond to the short-term crisis of COVID-19, as well as how it caused setbacks in progress. Now, after several months of experience and learning, I want to explore what it takes for a city to come back better than ever.

What Does it Mean to Build Back a Better City?

If your house burned down and you had a chance to rebuild, how would you do it? Would you bring it back exactly the way it was, with carpet stains, a rickety heating system, and outdated appliances and fixtures? Of course not. You’d take the opportunity to plan a better house, with more modern and efficient technologies that would help you live better, while lessening your impact on the environment. So, shouldn’t we do the same for our cities during the COVID-19 recovery and the climate crisis? Instead of simply thinking of recovery in economic terms: restoring and strengthening jobs and the economy, how can we make cities regenerative, livable, and thriving?

The Thriving Cities Initiative, part of C40 Cities, is working with Philadelphia, Amsterdam, and Portland, Oregon to pilot COVID-19 recovery efforts as an opportunity to innovate and build back a healthier, more sustainable, and resilient city. According to the initiative, “the approach takes the Doughnut Economics framework for meeting peoples’ needs within planetary boundaries, and downscales it to the city level.” The Doughnut has a social foundation to ensure no one is short on the essentials, and an ecological ceiling to ensure that we protect Earth’s life-supporting systems. Between those boundaries is the ecological and social ‘safe space.’

Image source: Doughnut Economics

Christine Knapp, director of the Office of Sustainability for the City of Philadelphia, says layering the thriving cities concept into recovery means looking beyond metrics like GDP as an indicator of progress. “It means looking at success a little differently. To speak about a green and just recovery means focusing on the fundamental roots of climate change, racial injustice, and economic disparities, and finding ways to fix systems as we rebuild them.” She has a vision of Philadelphia not only recovering but thriving. For instance, while job creation is an indicator of recovery, the jobs should also be good, well-paying jobs that contribute to a healthier, better city. Additionally, providing more affordable and energy efficient housing, more green spaces to allow residents to connect with nature, more trees  to keep homes cooler and healthier, and a thriving mobility network can help support climate, equity, and economic recovery goals.The Thriving Cities Initiative is working with Philadelphia to pilot new ways of thinking, governance, and collaboration to foster community-led action for a green and just future.

As one of the members of C40 Cities, Philadelphia has committed to reducing citywide carbon emissions by 80% by 2050 and moving to 100% renewable energy. Last year, Mayor Jim Kenney signed new legislation requiring all non-residential buildings over 50,000 square feet to either achieve a high-performance building standard or perform a tune-up to bring building systems to their highest efficiency. Before COVID, the city saw this as a chance to expand green jobs. Post-COVID, this initiative will help recover the 18,000 clean energy jobs estimated to have been lost in the Philadelphia region since the start of the pandemic, while helping to cut carbon emissions by nearly 200,000 metric tons per year.

How Do We Implement Building Back Better Cities?

The work of better, happier cities cannot be implemented by governments or private organizations alone. Regional governments, businesses, banks, and financial institutions must commit to green stimulus and inclusive recovery. These recovery strategies will prioritize jobs and growing the economy, support health and pollution reduction, enhance energy and climate resilience, and support decarbonization, all while focusing on social equity.

The UN Policy Brief on COVID-19 in the Urban World offers three key recommendation to reflect on and reset how we live in, interact with, and rebuild cities:

  1. Ensure that all phases of the pandemic response tackle inequalities and long-term development deficits and safeguard social cohesion.
  2. Strengthen the capacities of local governments.
  3. Pursue a green, resilient, and inclusive economic recovery by focusing on high ecological transformation and job creation, to steer growth toward low-carbon resilient pathways and advance the SDGs.

As mentioned above in the City of Philadelphia’s initiative, we know that one of the most effective ways to build back a stronger, more resilient, cohesive city is through building decarbonization. Decarbonization projects:

  • Create good, skilled jobs
  • Help cities accelerate progress toward the goals of The Paris Agreement
  • Generate operational cost savings for cities in a time they are most needed
  • Are ‘shovel ready,’ meaning they can be implemented within a year, and there are funding mechanisms that can finance the cost without capital outlay

According to the IEA, the job creation potential of investment in building efficiency improvements is substantial, creating nine to 30 jobs for every one million dollars invested. It’s estimated that 10% of the global workforce is in construction, and as the pandemic drastically reduced activity in the building sector, these projects have the potential to get people back to work, many in minority-owned businesses.

Anatomy of Decarbonization in Buildings

Source: ENGIE Impact

In the U.S. buildings account for about 40% of all CO2 emissions, from burning onsite fossil fuels for water and space heating, to generating electricity for lighting, HVAC, and appliances. As we return to work during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, improved airflow and UV lighting can create safer and healthier environments. To get to these safer outcomes, building upgrade work will need to be done.

Measuring Quantifiable Success

Recovery after COVID will be measured by job creation, reopened businesses, and new revenue. But what are the metrics of building back better through decarbonization, renewable energy, and green jobs?

  • Success of measures like building decarbonization are informed by cost and consumption data. What was the operational and resource spend before and after upgrade work? This savings data can then be converted into data on emissions reductions. Space heating and cooling account for almost 40% of energy use in buildings and for 42% of CO2. If just 20% of buildings in advanced economies were retrofitted with efficient technologies over the next five years, we could reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions from space heating by about 20%.
  • The city of Los Angeles launched its Sustainable City pLAn in 2015, a directive that puts the city on a path to protect the environment while growing jobs and the economy. According to Mayor Garcetti’s office, L.A. soon became the number one solar city in America, pioneered new transportation technologies, reduced greenhouse gas emission by 11% in a single year, and created more than 35,000 green jobs, showing the link between sustainable growth and jobs.
  • In Philadelphia, the Mayor’s Office of Sustainability partnered with PhiladelphiaWorks to document the number of workers participating in a ‘clean economy’ including recycling, pollution mitigation and education and training. A survey revealed that 9.3% of employees in the region produced green goods and services while 5.5% were using green technologies and business practices.

Measuring Qualitative Success

While building a green economy around decarbonization, resource efficiency, renewable energy, and electric mobility will create jobs and reduce emissions, is it possible to  measure the greater impact: that people are happy and thriving?

The World Happiness Report is a survey of the state of global happiness that ranks 156 countries by how happy their citizens perceive themselves to be. The latest report focused on environments for happiness, “with special attention on the social environment, happiness in cities and rural areas, and the natural environment, including links between happiness and sustainable development.”

Researchers connected countries and cities with a higher SDG Index score to those with a higher subjective well-being. In a COVID-19 recovery scenario, SDGs can provide a more holistic framework for the objectives that cities should aim for to increase citizens’ well-being and satisfaction, including inclusive and sustainable economic health, resilient infrastructure, sustainable cities, and climate action, to name just a few. Higher SDG scores can result in cities with higher levels of well-being because investments in infrastructure are done in a ‘climate-smart’ way with supplementary benefits. For instance, some cities have installed ‘smart’ LED streetlights that are not only more energy efficient and reduce utility costs, but also form the backbone of the emerging 5G network and can also integrate IoT technology, such as air pollution sensors. This infrastructure investment also generates good jobs that pay living wages. Lastly, climate-smart infrastructure investments create healthier communities by making them cleaner and more resilient; for instance, replacing gas vehicles with smart EVs to reduce air pollution. Connecting SDGs and the prioritization of sustainability to COVID-19 recovery could ultimately lead to stronger economic development and citizen wellbeing, including a robust job market, better air quality, and healthier communities.

Leverage Pivotal Moments to Come Back Better Than Ever

In his opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 in March 2020, the WHO Director-General urged, “Let’s all look out for each other, because we need each other.” In the context of COVID-19, this advice applies not only to health and safety, but to the weeks and months to come. COVID recovery is a chance to innovate and build healthy, sustainable and resilient cities, and in turn, better lives for all citizens in the context of increasingly complex and volatile global issues and influence. The time to be proactive, rather than reactive, is now.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.

3 Comments

  1. I want to applaud the 360 thinking that is exhibited in this blog and for identifying the need for a just and inclusive recovery. If we are truly going to build back stronger and better more needs to be done to create equitable and sustainable development. Indeed, I would posit that we will not build stronger and better cities if equity is not a driver; and that sustainable development is not sustainable or (climate) smart if equity is not factored into the plan. A city without equitable housing policies and affordable housing will not be a better city. This blog states that “Recovery after COVID will be measured by job creation, reopened businesses, and new revenue,” it is absent, however, of metrics for equity.

    Thriving and happy are great goals for cities. However, if after Covid and umpteen dollars are spent on temporary aid and infrastructure – we still have hungry people living under bridges and in the shadows of buildings and parks – it will not be better. A city without equitable housing policies and affordable housing will not be a better, stronger or healthier city. If we have not addressed transportation needs for low wageworkers – it will not be better, it will be more of the same. Replacing lead pipes that poison children living in cities like Newark and Detroit must be prioritized as shovel ready (do it now) projects. Covid has revealed the inequities of missing broadband and potable water in urban, rural and indigenous communities. You cannot access the internet or wash your hands if the infrastructure does not exist.

    I would like to hear more about how ENGIE Impact and the MoM audience are thinking about building back with equity squarely and intentionally in the plan and as a measure of success. Are there examples of municipal governments and the consultants that work with them holding themselves accountable for redefining sustainable, climate-smart development as equitable development that provides all people opportunities to thrive? What will be your indicators of success?

    Reply
    • Thank you for this article and for your “on point” comments Sharon. There must be a greater priority placed on equity and health (particularly racial equity) or all the new investments will miss the mark and the wrong solutions advanced- still leaving us short. I echo all Sharon said here. Thanks

      Reply
  2. Tremendous article, thanks!
    Here we clearly see through a Donut methodology clear and abundant in arguments the parts of the problem that are implicitly related to mobility and the search for prosperity. Thank ¡
    The three internal, intermediate and external spheres are related to the effects of the central problem, people’s quality of life, their effects on the city due to overflowing and the global effects of overflowing cities, however there are key aspects to integrate this methodology that by the way it draws my attention in its detail and consequences, one of these are the changes that must be made in governance and alimentation habits related to the disinvestment of solutions involved with fossil fuels and the other with consumerism.
    In other words, it reveals the change in activity or the hands of polluting technologies with their associated capital and the search for satisfaction of basic needs instead of hoarding for assured and indiscriminate consumption.
    However, the central theme remains the same, mobility and consumerism with a clear, directed and predisposition to cover basic needs of the Maslov scale to obtain freedom in growth and development of transcendental activities.
    While on the other hand, there is talk of building new cities, and that it cannot be from the same old structures because it does not have the essential concept of design and discernment of human behaviour in this new logic, by the way, much more realistic than we had before arrival of the avatar virus that catalysed all these truths once seen as crazy beyond all logic.
    Today the problem is the human who must unlearn the old logic and create his new space from the known truth, and here it must be added that the family and the home is the legal essence of society, a nucleus where all social and social gazes are directed massive programs of change, then it should be the object of change from its own activity, needs and already established legal purpose. Considering all the variables of expenditure and intervention in the problems already related, among these energy, water and food as well as human waste in concentrated areas called cities, which are globally related to their effects on the environment.
    At this moment creativity turns to a house with the following characteristics according to C40 to satisfy the needs of residents within planetary limits, cities will have to change governance and decision-making systems, acquisitions, investments, production, distribution and consumption to support sustainable lifestyles. This means: A Housing that effectively solves from build a new world from an intelligent effort that considers the way of being and the basic needs within a housing solution for any person or corporation in the world. What is considered Donut’s Social Foundation or well known by Maslow Pyramid.
    Basic needs satisfied with the minimum of energy- water, food, health- education- work and income – peace and protection with justice – political opinion – social equity – gender equality – communications networks and multiple smart grids. Homes with sustainable behaviour, designed for Non-Mobility.
    Citizens themselves invest in such solutions and are involved for life educating their children in these houses that change shape, grow or shrink over time at will.
    This solution, which by the way we have developed it for at least five years is not the focus of attention, because it is not in the hands of the old capitals and their objectives. Nor is it an object of credit or investment because nobody wants to accept the definitive change, and on the other hand it seems that change has not yet been considered from the root, building homes that are an essential part of the solution, thus keeping us all in the problem.
    It is about the manufacture of housing solutions from a single production line for unlimited designs and requirements, as many as existing beings, considering that the only thing that makes us equal is to be in the same situation; be infinitely different and respectable.

    Inhabiting oneself then is a right, not a privilege, since it is from our being (infinite) where everything that we are is born in the transit through this life, to live with all the basic needs satisfied to develop our lives in order to reach transcendental needs is a privilege that we all deserve to recognize and share with the environment and the universe that connects us, from our refuge, home.

    Thank newly,

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

The Pandemic, Inequality, Housing Affordability, and Urban Land

The Pandemic, Inequality, Housing Affordability, and Urban Land

Since the Great Recession of 2008, the housing wealth gap has expanded to include not just Black and Brown Americans, but younger White Americans as well. Millennials and Generation Z Whites are now joining their Black and Brown peers in facing untenable housing precarity and blocked access to wealth. With wages stuck at 1980 levels and housing prices at least double (in inflation adjusted terms) what they were 40 years ago, many younger Americans, most with college degrees, are giving up on buying a home and even struggle to rent apartments suitable for raising a family.

What makes it hard for policy people and citizens to accept this truth is that we have not seen this problem in a very long time. Back in the 1920s of course, but not really since then. But this is actually an old problem that has come back to haunt us; a problem first articulated by Adam Smith in the 1700s.

Multi-modal Transit and the Public Realm

Multi-modal Transit and the Public Realm

More than ever, urban transit services are in need of sustainable and affordable solutions to better serve all members of our diverse communities, not least among them, those that are traditionally car-dependent. New mobility technologies can be a potential resource for local transit agencies to augment multi-modal connectivity across existing transit infrastructures.

We envision a new decentralized and distributed model that provides multi-modal access through nimble and flexible multi-modal Transit Districts, rather than through traditional, centralized, and often too expensive Multi-modal Transit Hubs. Working in collaboration with existing agencies, new micro-mobility technologies could provide greater and seamless access to existing transit infrastructure, while maximizing the potential of the public realm, creating an experience that many could enjoy beyond just catching the next bus or finding a scooter. So how would we go about it?

Cross Sectoral Partnerships Can Fight Human Trafficking

Cross Sectoral Partnerships Can Fight Human Trafficking

Dedicated anti-trafficking actors across the nation are trying to build better systems in big jurisdictions like New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, and in smaller but scrappy jurisdictions like Waco, Texas and Boaz, Alabama. They all share the same need, for stronger interconnectedness as an anti-trafficking field, and more collaboration.

The Forging Freedom Portal is a one-stop shop where a police officer planning a victim-centered operation can connect with their law enforcement counterparts, and the right service providers ahead of time, collaborating to make sure they’re planning for the language skills, social services, and legal support that victims may need. The portal is a place where the people who care most about ending human trafficking, who are doing the hard work every day on the ground, can learn from each other and share best practices to raise the collective standard of this work.

The Future of Cities

Mayors, planners, futurists, technologists, executives and advocates — hundreds of urban thought leaders publish on Meeting of the Minds. Sign up below to follow the future of cities.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Wait! Before You Leave —

Wait! Before You Leave —

Subscribe to receive updates on the Executive Cohort Program!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This