Construction Begins on Kenyan Smart City
The development of Konza Technology City – dubbed “Africa’s Silicon Savannah” - is finally underway, following a ground breaking ceremony by Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki on January 23, 2013.
Konza Technology City is a US$7-10.0 billion Greenfield project to be developed at a 5000 acre site at Konza, 60 kilometers south of Nairobi. This 20-year, four-phase development is a flagship project of Vision 2030, Kenya’s economic blueprint for attaining middle-income status by year 2030.
[marker address="konza, kenya"]Konza, Kenya[/marker]
Konza will be a planned smart city, complete with ICT parks focused on what the founders are calling "IT-Enabled Services (ITES)". By this they mean to include "Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), Software Development, Data Centers, Disaster Recovery Centers, and Call Centers"; light assembly manufacturing industries, residential, financial "and social amenities to provide a high quality of life".
The first phase of development will take up 150 acres and lead to the construction of the "Business Pavilion", which will host the Konza Master Plan Exhibition Hall and administrative offices.
Konza City will be managed by the Konza Technopolis Development Authority (KOTDA).
To enable the implementation of the Konza City project, the Kenyan Government contracted the services of HR&A Advisors of New York in July 2012 . HR&A is serving as a Master Delivery Partner for six months, with the goal being to come up with a business development strategy detailing the vision of the proposed technology city. HR&A is also creating an implementation plan which includes these elements: Anchor Tenant Strategy, Physical Master Plan, Infrastructure Financing Plan, Business and Cash-Flow Plan and a Governance Plan for KOTDA. HR&A are set to finalize their contractual mandate in a few days.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
From an energy type standpoint, a city’s electric utility can make a big difference regarding which actions cities should undertake. For instance, a city in the service territory of an electric utility with ambitious plans to decarbonize its generation mix may want to focus greater attention on future emissions scenarios versus current emissions when making decisions on priorities. This would mean focusing actions on transportation, space heating, and industrial processes, since those would likely be greater contributors to emissions (vs. electricity) in such a future scenario.
While it may sound like a simple process, there are challenges to consider when it comes to the effectiveness of parking sensors, such as their location. For example, in-ground sensors, a technology used by some cities in the past, presented a myriad of problems, including ineffective readings that can result in unreliable data and lost revenue.
In the long run, even the largest, most powerful cities will struggle to rein in sophisticated global mobility companies. Thoughtful regulation at the state and federal level will eventually be necessary. Cities are becoming more active in setting policy for emerging services like bikes and scooters, and can incorporate thoughtful requirements in their license schemes. There are steps that government can take today to avoid some of the worst long-term risks.