Citizens: Smart Cities Best Partners
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Cities at their core are about citizens — the intermingling of diverse sets of people who live, work, visit and play there. Together they create a rich social fabric that transcends buildings, streets and services to form a culture, an identity.
All city leaders understand the need to maintain strong connections between citizens, neighborhood networks, government officials and private companies. Yet, all too often, Smart City efforts focus on systems and technologies designed for top-down efficiency without fully integrating the perspectives of the people whose lives will be impacted.
The bottom line is, when we talk about Smart Cities, we aren’t smart if we’re not all involved.
Early examples we can learn from include Songdo, South Korea and Masdar City in Abu Dhabi – both very ambitious built-from-scratch community reinventions. The main focus for those Smart Cities was adopting innovative technology to drive efficiency, environmental sustainability, and economic development – not so much engaging the citizen. Partnerships consisted of high tech companies, innovative financing banks, university consortiums and such, with less emphasis on meeting ordinary citizens’ needs. Some of these state-led top-down city developments are being criticized for being “so digitally wired, they lose the essence of sociability.”
It all comes back to this – smart city efforts need to address the fundamental question – smart for whom? As Kanter & Litow describe, that means understanding that the most important connectors across city systems are the people who turn it from “a mechanistic bundle of infrastructure elements into a set of vibrant human communities”.
We are now realizing that if we don’t involve citizens, and actually empower them with the ability to both access and provide data, even if they don’t always know they are doing it, then we are missing a very substantial step, not to mention a lot of big data opportunities that are advantageous to the city itself. We need to design technology offerings to better enable the citizen, to empower them with what is meaningful, making them part of the solution.
When we look at these city partnerships and involving citizens, a good example is Waze, the private navigation startup acquired by Google. This navigation pioneer’s success stems from its ability to design a navigation app that is based primarily on the give-and-take of crowdsourcing. Every opt-in individual with a digital device essentially becomes a sensor, merging with other sensors to create a real-time understanding of what’s happening on the roadways. Waze also launched a Connected Citizens Program that unites cities and citizens to understand not only what’s happening on the roads right now, but also how cities can improve incident response times and make better infrastructure decisions to benefit travelers. The Connected Citizens Program has many committed partners already – Rio de Janeiro, Los Angeles County, the State of Florida and the New York Police Department to name a few.
Similarly, the City of Oakland is using crowdsourcing to identify potholes in the City. Potholes are serious business – in fact I saw a quote recently that said “reporting potholes is the gateway drug to civic empowerment”! Washington DC is one City that’s being overloaded with conventional 311 calls to report potholes. It’s now using Waze data crowdsourced from users as part of their “potholeaplooza” campaign to combat the “war on potholes”.
I also like the Rio de Janeiro example of using crowdsourcing to help citizens avoid garbage truck delays. Have you ever tried to circumnavigate a garbage truck or sweeper on a narrow street? Well, citizens in Rio know that this is nearly impossible. The city is loading GPS trackers in the garbage trucks and conveying data to the system where citizens can track the truck’s route and understand how to best avoid congestion and long wait times. Again, realizing real citizen problems and solving them by getting everyone involve is really making an impact.
Another cool way that cities are engaging with citizens via multi-tasking technology is through lighting. Smart streetlights are getting a lot of attention because LED retrofits can yield 60%+ energy savings while providing a host of other benefits when automation and sensors are added. But beyond that, cities are using lighting to draw people to parts of the city and engage with residents and visitors alike. For instance San Jose is using light art to engage and educate the public with an LED art project that citizens use as a meeting point and communication hub. Education and community art are being combined to creatively illuminate and stimulate an urban landscape. Here light graffiti defines a local attraction that citizens identify as an energetic, appealing and safe haven to interact (and in this case they enjoy the added amusement of being able to change the performance of the artscape with your smart phone).This kind of interaction with the public is central to a city’s mission to nurture desirable spaces and reinforce a sense of place and community.
These are REAL examples of partnerships that engage citizens by getting them involved to become part of civic problem solving. Citizen collaboration is becoming the new smart. Smart City challenges are substantial, and no single party can meet all the needs alone. Partnering with technology companies, solution providers, universities are key but it is essential to have the citizens involved to make the smart city a reality.
For more insight into smart city trends, review Black & Veatch’s Strategic Directions Smart City/Smart Utility Report (2016).
This blog post is part of a series. Read the next post: The Heart and Soul of Smart Cities
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Housing that is affordable to low-income residents is often substandard and suffering from deferred maintenance, exposing residents to poor air quality and high energy bills. This situation can exacerbate asthma and other respiratory health issues, and siphon scarce dollars from higher value items like more nutritious food, health care, or education. Providing safe, decent, affordable, and healthy housing is one way to address historic inequities in community investment. Engaging with affordable housing and other types of community benefit projects is an important first step toward fully integrating equity into the green building process. In creating a framework for going deeper on equity, our new book, the Blueprint for Affordable Housing (Island Press 2020), starts with the Convention on Human Rights and the fundamental right to housing.
Since the Great Recession of 2008, the housing wealth gap has expanded to include not just Black and Brown Americans, but younger White Americans as well. Millennials and Generation Z Whites are now joining their Black and Brown peers in facing untenable housing precarity and blocked access to wealth. With wages stuck at 1980 levels and housing prices at least double (in inflation adjusted terms) what they were 40 years ago, many younger Americans, most with college degrees, are giving up on buying a home and even struggle to rent apartments suitable for raising a family.
What makes it hard for policy people and citizens to accept this truth is that we have not seen this problem in a very long time. Back in the 1920s of course, but not really since then. But this is actually an old problem that has come back to haunt us; a problem first articulated by Adam Smith in the 1700s.
More than ever, urban transit services are in need of sustainable and affordable solutions to better serve all members of our diverse communities, not least among them, those that are traditionally car-dependent. New mobility technologies can be a potential resource for local transit agencies to augment multi-modal connectivity across existing transit infrastructures.
We envision a new decentralized and distributed model that provides multi-modal access through nimble and flexible multi-modal Transit Districts, rather than through traditional, centralized, and often too expensive Multi-modal Transit Hubs. Working in collaboration with existing agencies, new micro-mobility technologies could provide greater and seamless access to existing transit infrastructure, while maximizing the potential of the public realm, creating an experience that many could enjoy beyond just catching the next bus or finding a scooter. So how would we go about it?