Cities of Innovation: Amsterdam as a Hyper-Connected City
As the world moves into an accelerated phase of mass urbanization and mega cities are developing across the globe, the governments of many smaller cities are looking for ways to differentiate themselves and to attract talent from around the world. Two cities stand out in their drive to be different: San Francisco and Amsterdam. Even though both are relatively small in comparison with the mega cities popularized by international media, one could say these “boutique cities” think differently and act more nimbly than their mega counterparts. It is no coincidence that Lonely Planet selected these two hyper-connected cities as the #1 and #2 destination cities for 2013.
Still, it may be advantageous for small cities to pursue a growth strategy, for example by merging with other small cities to become a larger city or by joining together in a sort of “global ring” to make up a virtual mega city, hyper-connected in both the digital and physical realms and boasting a diverse population. As, according to Geoffrey West, the size of a city has significant impact on its innovation capacity.
So, does Amsterdam have the right infrastructure to become a hyper-connected city? Let’s consider the requirements.
- High speed broadband and mobile infrastructure. A hyper-connected city needs to have the most advanced digital infrastructure to support a wide range of new companies, services, and products. Both on fixed and wireless broadband, Amsterdam has seen great adoption and penetration rates, and the Amsterdam Internet Exchange provides hyper connectivity.
- Seamless logistic and trade infrastructure. Amsterdam has a world-class logistics infrastructure, with the Port of Amsterdam, the nearby Port of Rotterdam, and Schiphol Airport. In their need to look beyond their own borders, the Netherlands has historically been a hub for trade in Europe and beyond and continues this tradition today.
- Event infrastructure. The many conferences, tradeshows, and events hosted in Amsterdam are often an important first introduction to the city. These occasions can facilitate serendipitous encounters. HBR recently wrote an interesting article about the importance of facilitating serendipity. The article asks what would happen if the infrastructure of such events would be focused on the true innovators, the people that come to Amsterdam to fulfill their need for “discovery” as described in The Innovator’s DNA (Clayton M. Christensen, et al).
- Cultural infrastructure. In attracting the right people to a city, museums and cultural events play an important and sometimes underestimated role. Conference and tradeshow organizers base location strategy in part on a city’s cultural offerings, since culture functions as a magnet for global citizens, leaders, and the creative class. Amsterdam certainly wins on this point, with a host of cultural offerings in the visual and performing arts and the creative industries.
- Liveability infrastructure. Amsterdam scores very high as a liveable city both in terms of social cohesion as well as green space. The livability of a city is a key factor in helping a company CEO determine where to live and an entrepreneur where to establish a base.
- Open innovation infrastructure. Amsterdam’s strong network of knowledge institutes, combined with a thriving creative industries sector, a vibrant startup community, and a high density of European and global headquarters, present the opportunity to bring people together in a cross-disciplinary, cross-ideology, and cross-cultural setting. This works almost the same as the “Coffee House effect” as described by Steven Johnson. Amsterdam, with its open-mindedness and tolerance, has the potential to become the European place for “engineering diversity,” which is a necessary ingredient for breakthrough innovation.
There is more to it than being the #2 destination in the world on the Lonely Planet’s list of cities to visit. According to Trendwatching.com, the most important goal for Amsterdam would be to aim to “be in the top 10 list for cities that anyone, wherever they are in the world, would like to spend some time (from a few months to a few years) to make more of their lives, their networks, their education, their careers.” Let’s therefore create a new index of hyper-connected cities, cities tailored to future-makers: the entrepreneur, the crazy scientist, and the edgy artist that sees the city as a canvas and as an engine for creation.
Photo by tychay.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Social distancing is becoming the new normal, at least for those of us who are heeding the Center for Disease Control’s warnings and guidelines. But if you don’t have reliable, high-speed broadband, it is impossible to engage in what is now the world’s largest telecommunity. As many schools and universities around the world (including those of my kids) are shut down, these institutions are optimistically converting to online and digital learning. However, with our current broadband layout, this movement will certainly leave many Americans behind.
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.