Using the Climate Crisis as Catalyst to Increase Wellbeing
A year after Hurricane Maria ravaged Puerto Rico in 2017, many residents continue to struggle with mental illness. One suicide prevention hotline center, for example, has had over 4,500 calls, double those before Maria. That same year significant psychological problems also appeared in Sonoma County, California after historic wildfires destroyed entire neighborhoods.
Are these unique occurrences, experienced by just a small number of people? No. They are common human reactions to disasters and persistent overwhelming (toxic) stresses generated by rising global temperatures. Research has found that the psychological impacts often include severe anxiety, depression, PTSD, suicides, hopelessness, helplessness, moral distress, compassion fatigue, and other mental health disorders.
For example, 30 to 50 percent of people affected by Hurricane Katrina suffered from PTSD, severe depression, anxiety, or hopelessness, and suicides went up substantially. In the UK after the 2007 summer floods, 75 percent of the people directly impacted experienced severe anxiety, 50 percent experienced depression, and about 25 percent suffered from PTSD. Similar impacts have been found worldwide within people impacted by wildfires. After Superstorm Sandy pummeled the U.S. Northeast, more than 20 percent of residents reported PTSD, 33 percent reported depression and 46 percent reported severe anxiety. In 2017 the American Psychological Association concluded that hopelessness and helplessness are growing due to the “unrelenting day-by-day despair” of climate change.
Just as important, the harmful human reactions to rising global temperatures go beyond individual psychological problems to include intensifying psycho-social-spiritual maladies such drug and alcohol abuse, child and spousal abuse, aggression, extremism, crime, and violence. For example, research has found that hotter temperatures, on their own, can increase assaults, robberies, burglaries, larceny and vehicle theft. The Canadian Red Cross found that the risk of violence can increase by up to 300 percent after a disaster depending on the type and scope of individual and collective protective factors that are undermined.
One result of these troubles will be mounting economic costs. Workers traumatized by climate change-related disasters, for example, will experience declining income if they are less productive when they return to work. Businesses with traumatized employees will see a reduction in output and profits. Families will incur additional monetary costs from payments for counseling services. Students who are traumatized or living with a traumatized family member might perform less well in school, with negative impacts on their employability and earnings for the rest of their lives. Communities with high levels of individual and collective traumas will struggle with degraded social capital; erosion of the relationships and trust that are essential to function efficiently and address problems. Many other costs can be expected if the psychological and psycho-social-spiritual impacts of rising global temperatures are left unaddressed.
Most importantly, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other climate damaging greenhouse gasses are currently on a pace to double by around mid-century, which will increase global temperatures by at least 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2C) above preindustrial levels, and possibly far higher. Unless substantial investments are made in preventative human resilience building, the psychological and psycho-social-spiritual impacts of rising global temperatures will undermine the safety, health, and wellbeing of individuals, groups, and entire communities everywhere
Further, climate change-enhanced acute traumas and toxic stresses will also imperil efforts to reduce the climate crisis to manageable levels. That’s because fearful people often retreat into a self-protective survival mode that leaves them uninterested in external issues like reducing greenhouse gasses.
These hazards are already visible around the globe. Yet, most municipal leaders have failed to see the urgent need to address them. They have also failed to realize that, by launching Transformational Resilience initiatives, these problems can be prevented, and individuals and groups can learn how to use climate change-aggravated adversities as catalysts to increase personal and social wellbeing as well as environmental conditions.
Rapid reductions in carbon emissions must be a top priority for all towns and cities, as is preparing human-built infrastructure and natural resources to withstand climate impacts.
Equally important, but almost completely unaddressed, is the urgent need to rapidly launch preventative Transformational Resilience initiatives in communities worldwide. The goal of these initiatives must be to ensure that all adults and youth have the opportunity to learn knowledge and skills that enable them to respond to many types of traumas and toxic stresses without harming themselves, other people, or the natural environment, and use those hardships as catalysts to learn about themselves and the world, grow as people, and find new direction and hope in life in ways that actually increase wellbeing.
Transformational Resilience is fundamentally different from disaster mental health and Psychological First Aid. These programs seek to stabilize people during and immediately after a disaster. However, many disaster mental health programs are already fragile and will be increasingly overwhelmed as climate change-enhanced disasters become more frequent and extreme. Further, many of the most harmful psychological and psycho-social-spiritual impacts of climate disruption are caused by ongoing toxic stresses, not acute disasters.
It is therefore important to strengthening disaster mental health, Psychological First Aid, and similar programs. However, this alone is woefully insufficient to address the growing array of adverse psychological and psycho-social-spiritual maladies generated by rising global temperatures.
We must also rethink what resilience means in the face of human-induced climate disruption. The common definition is the capacity to “bounce back” to pre-impact conditions. This notion, however, will become increasingly irrelevant as temperatures rise because it will be impossible to return to anything resembling previous conditions. Even if global society suddenly finds the political wherewithal to cut emissions far enough to slow or reverse climate disruption, there is convincing evidence that the psychological and psycho-social-spiritual impacts will continue to grow for a century or more, and be the slowest to recover.
The only response that makes sense is to launch initiatives that build widespread capacity to prevent harmful psychological and psycho-social-spiritual responses before they occur. This requires empowering all adults and youth with the knowledge, skills, and tools that build their capacity to:
- Think and act in healthy ways even in ongoing unhealthy conditions.
- Use climate change-enhanced; and many other, adversities as transformational catalysts to find new sources of meaning, purpose, and hope in life.
- Become actively involved in pro-social and solution-focused initiatives.
As seen in programs around the world that address one of more of these goals, achieving these ends requires collaborative efforts at the individual, organization, and community levels to help everyone learn what we call:
“Presencing” skills, which include:
- Basic knowledge about how trauma and toxic stress can affect their mind and body–and the thinking and behaviors of groups–everyone on the planet should become “trauma-informed.”
- Simple, self-administrable, age and culturally appropriate body and mind regulation skills. These can range from body-based to breath-based and thought-based skills, music and dance skills.
- Simple skills and methods to build and maintain robust social support networks – connections with one or more people that can provide unconditional support and/or practical assistance when needed.
In psychology these proficiencies are often called “self-regulation resilience skills.”
Just as importantly from a climate change perspective are what can be called “Purposing” skills, which include:
- Information and skills that help people learn how to turn toward adversities, rather than denying or ignoring them, and use them as motivation to learn new things about the world and themselves.
- Values awareness skills that help people clarify what is truly important in life, how they want to live, and how they want treat others and the natural environment in the midst of ongoing adversity.
- Hope generation skills that help people use difficult experiences to find new sources of meaning, direction, and hopefulness in life.
In psychology these proficiencies are often called “post-traumatic growth resilience skills.”
Building widespread capacity for Transformational Resilience requires the participation of numerous areas of expertise, including but by no means limited to, people focused on:
- Civic and community leadership
- Business leadership
- Psychological trauma and resilience building
- Mental health
- Psycho-social-spiritual maladies
- Public health
- Climate, environmental, and social justice
- K-12 and other youth programs
- Higher education
- Communities of faith and spirituality
People from these fields can be brought together under the umbrella of a Transformational Resilience Leadership Council (TRLC) in their neighborhood or community. The TRLC can begin the process of building Transformational Resilience by gathering baseline information including:
- Their areas existing levels of psychological and psycho-social-spiritual resilience. This can be accomplished by assessing the levels of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), alcohol and drug abuse, crime and violence, along with how different populations responded to previous traumas in the community (such as violence or natural disasters) and the capacity of local leaders and organizations to quickly come together, and collaborate to constructively assist residents in disasters.
- The norms and social narratives that dominate different neighborhoods and the community as a whole to determine which promote Transformational Resilience and which do not. For example, through community meetings, personal interviews, and group surveys community can be asked where they get information and news from, what or who’s perspective they trust the most, what message they hear most about key issues, and who or what local groups do they hear from most. From this the dominant existing social narratives can be identified.
- The ability of residents to learn psychological and psycho-social-spiritual resilience information and skills. This can be accomplished by assessing number and types of resilience information and skills building educational and training programs that exist, and the populations they serve. From this a gap analysis can be completed to determine who has access to age and culturally appropriate resilience education and skills training opportunities and which populations do not.
- With this information in hand, the TRLC can develop a strategy to expand existing resilience education and training programs, and launch new ones. The goal should be to ensure that within five years or so, every adult and child has the opportunity to learn Transformational Resilience information and skills. To support these efforts, it is important for TRLC members to regularly come together to promote new social norms and narratives focused on building Transformational Resilience to help residents continually hear how to constructively respond to adversities in ways that increase personal, social, and ecological wellbeing.
It is important to know that building widespread capacity for Transformational Resilience will people cope with many types of hardships, not just climate change related. For example, it will help adults and youth constructively respond to a wide-range of human-made disasters, such as terrorists acts and school shootings, as well as non-climate change related natural disasters such as earthquakes in ways that also help people learn, grow, and enhance wellbeing. Learning Transformational Resilience skills will also help people successfully cope with a wide range of toxic stresses, including family and job-related stresses.
The short description of Transformational Resilience initiatives provided here is the outcome of a review of resilience building occurring in communities around the world to prevent Adverse Childhood Experiences, partner, interpersonal, and community violence, mental health and psychosocial impacts following natural disasters, and many other individual and collective traumas. Much of it is explained in my book Transformational Resilience: How Building Human Resilience to Climate Disruption Can Safeguard Society and Increase Wellbeing (Greenleaf Publishing 2016). The research is also described in the “ITRC Library” found on the website of the International Transformational Resilience Coalition.
Reducing climate-damaging greenhouse gas emissions and preparing external physical infrastructure for the impacts of climate change is essential. However, it will not be possible to reduce climate change to manageable levels unless the human psychological and psycho-social-spiritual aspects of the crisis are aggressively addressed. This requires rapidly building widespread capacity for Transformational Resilience worldwide.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Accenture analysts recently released a report calling for cities to take the lead in creating coordinated, “orchestrated” mobility ecosystems. Limiting shared services to routes that connect people with mass transit would be one way to deploy human-driven services now and to prepare for driverless service in the future. Services and schedules can be linked at the backend, and operators can, for example, automatically send more shared vehicles to a train station when the train has more passengers than usual, or tell the shared vehicles to wait for a train that is running late.
Managing urban congestion and mobility comes down to the matter of managing space. Cities are characterized by defined and restricted residential, commercial, and transportation spaces. Private autos are the most inefficient use of transportation space, and mass transit represents the most efficient use of transportation space. Getting more people out of private cars, and into shared feeder routes to and from mass transit modes is the most promising way to reduce auto traffic. Computer models show that it can be done, and we don’t need autonomous vehicles to realize the benefits of shared mobility.
The role of government, and the planning community, is perhaps to facilitate these kinds of partnerships and make it easier for serendipity to occur. While many cities mandate a portion of the development budget toward art, this will not necessarily result in an ongoing benefit to the arts community as in most cases the budget is used for public art projects versus creating opportunities for cultural programming.
Rather than relying solely on this mandate, planners might want to consider educating developers with examples and case studies about the myriad ways that artists can participate in the development process. Likewise, outreach and education for the arts community about what role they can play in projects may stimulate a dialogue that can yield great results. In this sense, the planning community can be an invaluable translator in helping all parties to discover a richer, more inspiring, common language.
While the outlook for the environment may often seem bleak, there are many proven methods already available for cities to make their energy systems and other infrastructure not only more sustainable, but cheaper and more resilient at the same time. This confluence of benefits will drive investments in clean, efficient energy, transportation, and water infrastructure that will enable cities to realize their sustainability goals.
Given that many of the policy mechanisms that impact cities’ ability to boost sustainability are implemented at the state or federal level, municipalities should look to their own operations to implement change. Cities can lead as a major market player, for example, by converting their own fleets to zero emission electric vehicles, investing in more robust and efficient water facilities, procuring clean power, and requiring municipal buildings to be LEED certified.