5 Reasons for Cities to Value their Downtowns
Who will you meet?
Cities are innovating, companies are pivoting, and start-ups are growing. Like you, every urban practitioner has a remarkable story of insight and challenge from the past year.
Meet these peers and discuss the future of cities in the new Meeting of the Minds Executive Cohort Program. Replace boring virtual summits with facilitated, online, small-group discussions where you can make real connections with extraordinary, like-minded people.
Downtown signifies a city’s greater brand or identity. When you visit a new city, where do you go? How do you learn and get acclimated? Where is the economic, cultural and civic center? Chances are you turn to the city’s natural hub – the downtown. Downtowns have historically been the regional epicenter; they’ve evolved into vibrant city centers; and if we are thoughtful and strategic, they hold the potential for an inclusive future.
The Value of U.S. Downtowns and Center Cities is a data-driven examination of downtowns’ role as engines of citywide vitality. This project represents the first iteration of a new, repeatable formula for calculating the value of downtown and makes the case that investing in downtown delivers powerful citywide and regional benefits. Urban centers are productive and exciting because downtowns are key places where people, capital, and ideas come together.
About the Data
The study identifies five key principles – economy, inclusion, vibrancy, identity and resilience. Supporting these principles are 100 plus key data points that collectively quantify downtown’s value to a broad range of stakeholders and sets a baseline for progress assessments and peer comparison. Metrics were calculated by change over time, per square mile, and share of city value, allowing the International Downtown Association (IDA) to begin measuring each downtown against its respective city and region.
Besides creating a new industry-wide standard, the process itself was powerful. It was informed by the award-winning project The Value of Canadian Downtowns and was a collaborative process between IDA, Stantec’s Urban Places, HR&A Advisors, and 13 downtowns across the U.S.: Baltimore, Charlotte, Grand Rapids, Lancaster (CA), Miami, Norfolk, Pittsburgh, Sacramento, San Antonio, Santa Monica, Seattle, San Francisco’s Union Square, and Wichita.
The Top 5 Takeaways
1. Downtowns are leading economic drivers for their cities.
Despite their small citywide footprint (representing on average 3 percent of citywide land), downtowns are economically in-demand and lucrative districts, warranting continued investment. Downtowns represent 11 percent of citywide assessed land value (averaging $8 million an acre), 30 percent citywide employment, 40 percent of citywide office space, and anywhere from 13-64 percent of the citywide tax revenue. This means that for every 1 percent of citywide land, downtowns contribute approximately 10 percent of citywide tax revenue. On average, the 13 downtowns contributed:
- 13 percent of total city income tax revenue
- 14 percent of total city sales tax revenue
- 19 percent of total city property tax revenue
- 45 percent of total city hotel tax revenue
- 64 percent of total city parking tax revenue.
Because of downtown’s productivity, every dollar invested has the potential to generate great returns. To maintain downtown’s economic impact, cities will need to continue investing there, both to cushion the loss from shrinking federal funding and to compensate for the evolving nature of tax revenues.
2. Downtowns are for everyone.
Part of downtowns’ value proposition is their diversity, inclusivity and open-mindedness. Downtowns are positioned to be highly inclusive places given their access to opportunities and essential services for all users. Downtown is home to an average of:
- 13 percent of the city’s foreign-born population
- 35 percent of the city’s non-white population
- 30 percent of the city’s middle-income population
The question remains: How can we create inclusive plans and policies to keep downtowns welcoming places to all community members? Cities should seize the opportunity to embrace a collaborative approach, engaging community cooperation, public and private leadership, thoughtful planning, and a regulatory climate that encourages strategic, place-based development designed to build community wealth, inclusion and accessibility.
3. Downtown’s vibrancy is reflected in its high density.
Which supports a variety of retail, infrastructure and institutional uses. These attributes offer mutually-reinforcing benefits to the region. Downtowns represent 38 percent of the citywide residential growth, 44 percent of the city’s share of hotels and 16 percent of the city’s retail sales and businesses. Downtowns also have nine times more retail sales than their citywide counterparts.
4. Downtowns have intrinsic cultural significance.
This defines the city and regional brands by offering historical and cultural assets, recreation and entertainment opportunities, and participation in civic activities. On average, the 13 downtowns contain 20 civic and community places, 9 museums, 72 public art installations and 71 historic structures. These assets exemplify downtown’s heritage and spirit. As downtowns evolve, we should encourage balancing authenticity and economic growth.
5. Downtowns are resilient.
A downtown’s size, value, proximity, density, diversity, mixed-use nature, and geographic location are powerful resiliency assets. Downtowns consistently and significantly rank higher than their cities when it comes to Walk Score, Bike Score and Transit Score (85-90 compared to 52-57). Downtowns also average 6 parks per square mile, have 75 percent commercial land use, and have higher rates of non-single-occupancy vehicle commuters compared to citywide figures (43 percent compared to 28 percent). These assets equip downtowns to more readily adapt to potential economic, social and environmental stresses.
What It All Means
With this initial pilot group of downtowns, we can already begin to see how impactful downtowns truly are to not only those who live and work there but to the greater city and region. The success of a downtown hinges on multilateral cooperation and planning between individuals, developers, employers and institutions. To ensure continued investment, cities and place management organizations must continually articulate the value of center cities not only to a collation of allies, but also to external stakeholders who benefit from, but may not recognize their part in ensuring that their downtown is economically, socially and civically successful.
Read more about The Value of U.S. Downtowns and Center Cities project and download the free report here.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Please note that this comment section is for thoughtful, on-topic discussions. Admin approval is required for all comments. Your comment may be edited if it contains grammatical errors. Low effort, self-promotional, or impolite comments will be deleted.
Read more from MeetingoftheMinds.org
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
People seem frequently to assume that the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” are synonyms, an impression reinforced by the frequent use of the term “climate resilience”, which seems to enmesh both concepts firmly. In fact, while they frequently overlap, and indeed with good policy and planning reinforce one another, they are not the same. This article picks them apart to understand where one ends and the other begins, and where the “sweet spot” lies in achieving mutual reinforcement to the benefit of disaster risk reduction (DRR).
As extreme weather conditions become the new normal—from floods in Baton Rouge and Venice to wildfires in California, we need to clean and save stormwater for future use while protecting communities from flooding and exposure to contaminated water. Changing how we manage stormwater has the potential to preserve access to water for future generations; prevent unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and damage to communities; and increase investments in green, climate-resilient infrastructure, with a focus on communities where these kinds of investments are most needed.
A few years ago, I worked with some ARISE-US members to carry out a survey of small businesses in post-Katrina New Orleans of disaster risk reduction (DRR) awareness. One theme stood out to me more than any other. The businesses that had lived through Katrina and survived well understood the need to be prepared and to have continuity plans. Those that were new since Katrina all tended to have the view that, to paraphrase, “well, government (city, state, federal…) will take care of things”.
While the experience after Katrina, of all disasters, should be enough to show anyone in the US that there are limits on what government can do, it does raise the question, of what could and should public and private sectors expect of one another?