5 Reasons for Cities to Value their Downtowns
Downtown signifies a city’s greater brand or identity. When you visit a new city, where do you go? How do you learn and get acclimated? Where is the economic, cultural and civic center? Chances are you turn to the city’s natural hub – the downtown. Downtowns have historically been the regional epicenter; they’ve evolved into vibrant city centers; and if we are thoughtful and strategic, they hold the potential for an inclusive future.
The Value of U.S. Downtowns and Center Cities is a data-driven examination of downtowns’ role as engines of citywide vitality. This project represents the first iteration of a new, repeatable formula for calculating the value of downtown and makes the case that investing in downtown delivers powerful citywide and regional benefits. Urban centers are productive and exciting because downtowns are key places where people, capital, and ideas come together.
About the Data
The study identifies five key principles – economy, inclusion, vibrancy, identity and resilience. Supporting these principles are 100 plus key data points that collectively quantify downtown’s value to a broad range of stakeholders and sets a baseline for progress assessments and peer comparison. Metrics were calculated by change over time, per square mile, and share of city value, allowing the International Downtown Association (IDA) to begin measuring each downtown against its respective city and region.
Besides creating a new industry-wide standard, the process itself was powerful. It was informed by the award-winning project The Value of Canadian Downtowns and was a collaborative process between IDA, Stantec’s Urban Places, HR&A Advisors, and 13 downtowns across the U.S.: Baltimore, Charlotte, Grand Rapids, Lancaster (CA), Miami, Norfolk, Pittsburgh, Sacramento, San Antonio, Santa Monica, Seattle, San Francisco’s Union Square, and Wichita.
The Top 5 Takeaways
1. Downtowns are leading economic drivers for their cities.
Despite their small citywide footprint (representing on average 3 percent of citywide land), downtowns are economically in-demand and lucrative districts, warranting continued investment. Downtowns represent 11 percent of citywide assessed land value (averaging $8 million an acre), 30 percent citywide employment, 40 percent of citywide office space, and anywhere from 13-64 percent of the citywide tax revenue. This means that for every 1 percent of citywide land, downtowns contribute approximately 10 percent of citywide tax revenue. On average, the 13 downtowns contributed:
- 13 percent of total city income tax revenue
- 14 percent of total city sales tax revenue
- 19 percent of total city property tax revenue
- 45 percent of total city hotel tax revenue
- 64 percent of total city parking tax revenue.
Because of downtown’s productivity, every dollar invested has the potential to generate great returns. To maintain downtown’s economic impact, cities will need to continue investing there, both to cushion the loss from shrinking federal funding and to compensate for the evolving nature of tax revenues.
2. Downtowns are for everyone.
Part of downtowns’ value proposition is their diversity, inclusivity and open-mindedness. Downtowns are positioned to be highly inclusive places given their access to opportunities and essential services for all users. Downtown is home to an average of:
- 13 percent of the city’s foreign-born population
- 35 percent of the city’s non-white population
- 30 percent of the city’s middle-income population
The question remains: How can we create inclusive plans and policies to keep downtowns welcoming places to all community members? Cities should seize the opportunity to embrace a collaborative approach, engaging community cooperation, public and private leadership, thoughtful planning, and a regulatory climate that encourages strategic, place-based development designed to build community wealth, inclusion and accessibility.
3. Downtown’s vibrancy is reflected in its high density.
Which supports a variety of retail, infrastructure and institutional uses. These attributes offer mutually-reinforcing benefits to the region. Downtowns represent 38 percent of the citywide residential growth, 44 percent of the city’s share of hotels and 16 percent of the city’s retail sales and businesses. Downtowns also have nine times more retail sales than their citywide counterparts.
4. Downtowns have intrinsic cultural significance.
This defines the city and regional brands by offering historical and cultural assets, recreation and entertainment opportunities, and participation in civic activities. On average, the 13 downtowns contain 20 civic and community places, 9 museums, 72 public art installations and 71 historic structures. These assets exemplify downtown’s heritage and spirit. As downtowns evolve, we should encourage balancing authenticity and economic growth.
5. Downtowns are resilient.
A downtown’s size, value, proximity, density, diversity, mixed-use nature, and geographic location are powerful resiliency assets. Downtowns consistently and significantly rank higher than their cities when it comes to Walk Score, Bike Score and Transit Score (85-90 compared to 52-57). Downtowns also average 6 parks per square mile, have 75 percent commercial land use, and have higher rates of non-single-occupancy vehicle commuters compared to citywide figures (43 percent compared to 28 percent). These assets equip downtowns to more readily adapt to potential economic, social and environmental stresses.
What It All Means
With this initial pilot group of downtowns, we can already begin to see how impactful downtowns truly are to not only those who live and work there but to the greater city and region. The success of a downtown hinges on multilateral cooperation and planning between individuals, developers, employers and institutions. To ensure continued investment, cities and place management organizations must continually articulate the value of center cities not only to a collation of allies, but also to external stakeholders who benefit from, but may not recognize their part in ensuring that their downtown is economically, socially and civically successful.
Read more about The Value of U.S. Downtowns and Center Cities project and download the free report here.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
While 2018 was filled with a number of successful smart city deployments, it also revealed significant challenges that will only intensify in years to come. The most pressing challenge to be addressed throughout 2019 is earning the public’s trust in smart city projects. Towards the end of 2018, we saw major data privacy concerns emerge from citizens. From these concerns a heated, but healthy discourse between citizens, local governments, and private sector companies rose to mainstream media prominence. Citizens’ expectations of privacy have begun to challenge the murky data privacy policies described by many in the private sector. 2019 will be the year of the smart city for the citizen.
Collaboration extends beyond City Hall. Unlike a city like New York, where most government functions are under the purview of the municipal government, a city the size of Chula Vista (population 268,000) or smaller has to collaborate with regional partners, such as school districts, hospital districts, water districts, the port district, and neighboring cities. By keeping dialogue open and working together on major projects we’ve opened up new opportunities for economic development, smart cities pilot initiatives and education.
AVs can move more people in fewer vehicles on less congested streets compared to private cars. This means that some London streets could be made narrower and spare street space can be reallocated for other uses including bus lanes, cycling lanes, or expanded pavements. Street space can also be released for vegetation, allowing for cleaner streets and better storm water management.