Top 10 US Cities for People, Profit, Planet
Every year, one hundred major cities are ranked by how well they support people, profit, and the planet. Starting with New York, ranked number one in the United States, we discuss the lessons and challenges of our top ten cities as ranked in the Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index (40-page report). Arcadis is a global design and consulting firm.
Cities are ranked by 32 indicators. For People, indicators include health, education, income inequality, crime, housing, and more. For Planet, the index weighs renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions, drinking water, air pollution, etc. For Profit, weightings include mobility, ease of doing business, GDP per capita, etc.
These are also smart cities, connecting public departments with private partners. These are connected cities, efficiently turning on lights only when needed, collecting useful data, and making the data open to citizens and partners. Here are the US cities, which ranked highest in people, profit, and planet, our take on their sustainability success, their challenges, and links to articles about these cities.
Top 10 US Sustainable Cities
Updated March 2017. Originally developed by John Addison.
#1. New York
New York is a global leader in banking and finance, dazzling in the performing arts, and a city of opportunity for all. In fact, these themes are interwoven in the musical Hamilton. Over 8 million live in the city’s five boroughs. Density creates a tapestry of 6,000 high-rise buildings woven together with integrated mobility that includes subways, buses, ridesharing, ferries, and bike lanes. New York has the highest walkscore of all major US cities. New Yorkers are resilient. For example, after superstorm Sandy caused some homes to lose power for months, New York State is Reforming the Energy Vision (REV), reducing carbon emissions, encouraging energy-efficient buildings and microgrids that self-power an emergency. With subways below sea level, and much of the city near sea level, climate change is a major challenge for New York.
- People 53%
- Planet 66%
- Profit 69%
Boston is a great center of education and research. The first public school in the nation was established there almost 400 years ago. Now great universities such as MIT and Harvard grace the Charles River, attracting thousands of research organizations and tech innovators. Mobility is a challenge; however, Boston has one of the highest walk scores, benefiting from its compact 48 square miles. Boston uses little renewable energy and faces the added challenge of sea rise. Boston 2050.
- People 62%
- Planet 62%
- Profit 60%
#3. San Francisco
San Francisco is part of Silicon Valley, which includes over 5,000 tech firms such as Google, Facebook, and Intel. San Francisco ranks #1 in the U.S. Clean Tech Leadership Index. Industry has attracted highly educated workers from all over the world, adding to the city’s diversity and inclusiveness. Already energy efficient with about 40 percent of energy generated with renewables, the city has ambitions to be powered with 100 percent renewables. California building code requires that new homes be zero net energy (ZNE) by 2020 and commercial buildings by 2030. This city of 47 square miles has a growing housing shortage, making it unaffordable for most. Most commute to work car free. San Francisco is headquarters for Uber, Lyft, Airbnb, and many shared-economy innovators. All automakers have Silicon Valley R&D centers with prototype self-driving cars. City residents keep 80 percent of waste from the landfill; the city has a 100 percent goal. San Francisco 2050.
- People 58%
- Planet 58%
- Profit 64%
Those living in Seattle feel a connection with nature. From any of its hills you can see the network of islands in the Puget Sound and snow-capped Mt. Rainer in the distance. Many buildings are energy efficient. The Bullitt Center is a certified Living Building, so efficient that its solar roof produces 60 percent more electricity than it uses, making the building net positive energy. Renewables meet 77 percent of the electricity needs for the state. Mobility has been too car-oriented, but that is changing with everything from bus rapid transit to voters approving a vast expansion of commuter rail. Washington Governor Jay Inslee is a long-time environmentalist and author of the classic Apollo’s Fire.
- People 56%
- Planet 66%
- Profit 56%
#5. Washington DC
The District of Columbia is the U.S. city with the highest percentage of people who walk to work. Walking is invited with the beauty of the city’s architecture, the National Mall, and green spaces. Its extensive Metro rail system, formerly had an excellent reputation, but now its aging infrastructure needs funding to again be reliable. Washington has a history of inclusiveness and job opportunity, but that may change with the new Trump administration. There is currently a tension between those who want to reduce the size of government, and those who support Washington, DC goals of becoming the healthiest, greenest, and most livable city in the United States by 2032. Read about how Washington DC can use technology to advance ZNE buildings, green infrastructure, and connected transportation.
- People 55%
- Planet 62%
- Profit 62%
The outdoors invites people to hike, bike, and ski whether on the Cherry Creek bike path, a city park, or high in the Rocky Mountains. Take Amtrak to Denver and use the Sixteenth Street Mall bus to reach your hotel. The RTD rail system connects many suburbs and now includes the airport. Although some buildings have solar and a few homes are ZNE, Colorado electricity is primarily from coal. Yet groups like NREL and the Rocky Mountain Institute are demonstrating that ZNE campuses and ecodistricts are feasible and a better way to work and live. In development is Pena Station Next, a smart community powered with a microgrid including solar+storage. Denver also scores high in People indicators.
- People 59%
- Planet 54%
- Profit 60%
#7. Los Angeles
The Arcadis report states: “Los Angeles continues to be a main hub for economic growth and innovation in the US, attracting population growth, entrepreneurship and international investors.” LA has reduced greenhouse gas emissions 20 percent since 1990. It has reduced water consumption 19 percent in one year, with comprehensive plans to achieve water independence. It is feasible to live carefree in LA, with its ever-expanding Metro transit, Metrolink regional rail, walking, bicycling and ridesharing. LA also has over 1,000 EV charging stations and a comprehensive Sustainable City Plan. LA embraces diversity but faces income inequality. To help, LA was the first major US city to establish a $15 per hour minimum wage. LA’s electric utility, SCE, is replacing nukes and gas with solar+storage+smart grid.
- People 58%
- Planet 56%
- Profit 53%
Know as the city of brotherly love, Philadelphia has worked on inclusiveness since it was founded in 1682 and English Quakers peacefully cooperated with Native Americans. Philadelphia was at the center of the founding of a new nation. The city’s grid plan became a model for early American urban design. While preserving the central city design, including a vast park system, a new Philadelphia2035 plan is unfolding that includes 18 district plans and integration with a northeast megaregion. Challenged with income inequality, the plan includes affordable housing and improved education for all. Pennsylvania is only three percent powered by renewables, creating a challenge for a city that aspires to be green. Read about Philadelphia’s innovative programs to address poverty, early childhood development, and at-risk children.
- People 55%
- Planet 62%
- Profit 51%
Baltimore is an inviting city on the water. It has been a leader in greenhouse gas reduction. However, Maryland is only seven percent powered by renewables. Baltimore is challenged with income inequality, but is revitalizing one neighborhood at a time.
- People 52%
- Planet 64%
- Profit 51%
Miami does well in affordable housing for its diverse population. Miami is at risk with over $40 billion of property and much of its population at sea level; flooding and sea level rise is a serious challenge for Miami with its drinking water aquifer already becoming salinated. Although blessed with sunshine, Florida is primarily powered by methane (natural gas) a potent heat-trapping greenhouse gas. Breaking down silos and integrating government agencies, Miami is addressing its challenges in water, development, and mobility. Miami is a smart city, using open data and the internet of things.
- People 50%
- Planet 62%
- Profit 54%
Making Yours a Sustainable City and a Smart City
After hours of research, it is clear that everyone has a different idea about what it means to be a sustainable or green city. Emissions and renewable energy are important, as are energy efficiency, equity, and health. Some cities, in our opinion should have been on this list. For example, Portland is not one of the 100 cities in the Arcadis list compiled by the Centre for Economics and Business Research. Should Baltimore outrank Chicago?
The Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index report, at 40 pages, is well worth reading. You may disagree with their ranking Zurich, Singapore, and Stockholm at the top, US states in the middle, and some cities excluded. They argue that to be a sustainable leader, you need to do well in many areas of People, Profit, and Planet. We can learn from Zurich’s success excelling in health, happiness, and economy, as it stays on track to become a 2,000-watt society by 2050.
Get started today. Pull together a city leadership team, pick a few indicators, create goals, and get busy. You could select a soaring goal such as improving life expectancy by a year, a practical goal such as reducing landfill waste by five percent, or improving employment by one percent. Make your city a little smarter by breaking down silos, connecting, installing sensors, big data and machine learning. You will be surprised about how achieving and celebrating success in one area, leads to success in others.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the CityMinded.org Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
Rhyzome Networks has undertaken a project to upgrade the equipment used for wireless access in order to create stronger connections between the root access points and the repeaters. Our new network does not rely on the original projects wireless mesh and fibre combination, and instead uses wireless point-to-point and fibre for the backhaul of information and the aging 7181 access points will be swapped out in favor of Aruba units.
Our journey into telecommunications began in 2009 as an initiative to provide a backhaul for Festival Hydro’s smart metering system. That project led us down a path to offering wireless and fibre optic connections. It became clear early on in the project that the infrastructure we were putting in place provided us with the opportunity to create a robust backbone that would support the offering of affordable internet and other connectivity options in a community that was, at the time, largely overlooked by the big players in the Canadian telecommunications space.
As historian Mark I. Gelfand has noted: “No federal venture spent more funds in urban areas and returned fewer dividends to central cities than the national highway program.” A micro example of the devastating effect of the highway system developed through the core of Indianapolis is Cruft Street, with a dead end abutting I-65 near the I-65/I-70 split (completed in 1976) in the Garfield Park area of Indianapolis. Forty-two percent of houses in the area have incomes below $25,000, and 13.5 percent live on less than $10,000 a year. The low income demographic of the area results in 22 percent of adults over age 25 having no high school diploma and 81 percent with no college degree.
An examination of the Cruft Street neighborhood has spurred many nonprofit organizations in Indianapolis to question how the public sector can support the role of arts and culture in revitalizing the Cruft Street neighborhood.
When thinking about the cities of the future, I know that they will be more connected, and I strongly believe that they must be more inclusive. We can’t have the Internet of Everything without the Inclusion of Everyone. Already today, a growing number of cities are using smart technologies to better connect people to places and to each other – and more importantly also connecting people to opportunities for better and safer lives.
Unfortunately, what still causes a significant amount of friction in our cities and prevents inclusive growth is the dominance of cash. In fact, close to 85 percent of all consumer payments in the world are still done with cash or checks. This means that far too many people are trapped by default in an informal economy. They lack the financial services to guard themselves against risk, save for themselves, plan for their children’s futures, and build better lives.