The New Data-Centric Approach to Improving Urban Air Quality

By Sean Wihera

Sean Wihera is the Director of Business Development with Clarity Movement Co.

Oct 16, 2017 | Environment, Technology | 2 comments

Cities around the world are spending billions of dollars to address urban pollution. London alone has pledged to spend over $1.1 billion over the next five years. We continue to see cities using a selection of classically used policies, such as vehicle restrictions by license plate numbers, in an attempt to address their pollution. Unfortunately, these policies are always costly and often yield limited results. As it stands, many cities continue to struggle to meet their air quality targets and still routinely violate their maximum allowances for emissions.

For years the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Lung Association (ALA), and others have reported on the public health consequences of air pollution and lack of a “safe level” of exposure. However, the high cost of traditional government-operated monitoring stations – up to $250,000USD per station – has made it simply too costly to provide additional measurement points at the neighborhood or street level. While these stations are typically deployed throughout a city in locations representative of ambient air quality levels, pollution isn’t uniform and unfortunately studies continue to find many sensitive and disadvantaged communities have pollution levels far exceeding those reported by the limited number of monitoring stations.

Without better data cities are making ‘best guesses’ to address their pollution, much like moving chess pieces when you can’t really see the chess board.

Today, continued advances in low-cost sensors and the Internet of Things have enabled the next-generation of air quality monitoring that can provide decision makers and communities with accurate, high resolution data at costs orders of magnitude lower than traditional monitoring stations. Cloud-based platforms and machine learning can ensure these low-cost solutions are increasingly accurate and remain calibrated. Further, these new solutions are often designed for minimal maintenance to ensure they remain feasible for city budgets (or other operators) over the long term.

As cities look to increasingly aggressive policies and investments, such as fleet replacements, road closures and even comprehensive diesel vehicle bans, politicians and decision makers will increasingly need data to support and de-risk these high value decisions across all the contributing sectors of government. Air quality is a particular challenge for cities due to its inherently multi-sector nature. While on one hand the relevant Environmental Authorities are responsible (and budgeted) for measuring pollution, it is often ultimately the Transportation and Energy Authorities that will be making the fleet procurement or policy decisions that can actually solve the problem of urban pollution. It is essential for city governments and all the stakeholders therein to have the data necessary to define these variables in support of this decision making in specific policy implement and investments at the appropriate scale. Further, by having these networks in place decision makers can monitor the effectiveness of their policies in real-time to see what is work and what isn’t.

“If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it and you can’t fix it”. – Michael Bloomberg, Twitter, 2014

A Demand for Data: From Smart Cities to Smart Citizens

While “smart cities” and governments are currently driving the demand for more data, we expect this top-down use of data to be increasingly complemented by a bottom-up awareness among citizens. Despite concerns around device accuracies and calibration, we’ve recently seen a tremendous increase in the uptake of low cost indoor air quality devices and personal exposure monitors as individuals are increasingly looking to understand their own individual exposures.

As recent studies have found, about half of the 4.4 million children who live in Delhi today have irreversible lung damage as a consequence of the pollution. Considering that the health effects of emissions, such as PM 2.5 (particulate matter 2.5 microns or smaller), continue to stack up over the 10, 20, and 30-year time frame, it’s more important than ever to consider where you live.

“As awareness and the availability of accurate high resolution air quality data increases we predict residential real estate will particularly drive clean air policy as homebuyers are ultimately voters.” –Zillow, 2016

A 2016 study from Zillow Research identified safety as the second most important driver of home selection by a significant margin, second to affordability. As awareness around the health costs of pollution continues to increase we believe homebuyers and community leaders will increasingly recognize that “safety” is not only about stopping criminals coming through the door – but pollution coming through your windows. And at the same time, homebuyers will recognize that air quality is not just about health, but also about their real estate investment. Just as homebuyers are increasingly savvy about the solar resources (Google SunRoof & Zillow SunNumber) and the school districts they’re buying into as a factor in their home’s value, homebuyers will increasingly demand clean air policies not only to protect their families, but to protect and increase the value of their homes as well.

We expect this continued alignment to provide yet another clear market enablement opportunity for the next generation of high resolution air quality data.

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

2 Comments

  1. Hi Sean, air quality is a timely issue here in the San Francisco Bay Area where I’m based. As I type this, I see we’re under yet another unhealthy air alert from the fires happening to the north of us. Comparisons of daily air quality to places like Beijing are giving some people here a better understanding of how common poor air quality is in many parts of the world.

    Having air quality information linked to home buying is an interesting idea. I can see this becoming even more important than WalkScore in its influence on purchasing decisions. One concern though is that it will further exacerbate the problem of devaluation of homes in marginalized communities, many of which are located in areas of poor air quality (such as those located near industrial sites or freeways). So it might not only contribute to the poor getting poorer, but also to the poor getting unhealthier as they struggle to sell and leave properties that have a poor air quality label. Ideally though, better air quality data would then be leveraged to tackle such environmental justice imbalances. Using the data to tackle improvements in air quality – right from the sources of pollution – is a critical aspect of all of this.

    Reply
    • Hi Christina – Thank you very much for the great comment!

      We’ve been very concerned about how our data could impact already disadvantaged communities and have continually grappled with this topic internally. As a Bay Area company we’re acutely aware of the challenges neighboring communities such as West Oakland, Richmond and Martinez continually face as a result of the refineries, freeways and other emissions sources.

      The increase in data will certainly begin to quantify what many of our communities already suspect and continue to suffer health effects from. While in the short term this could potentially cause limited challenges, we look at solutions like ours as a way to support progressive new California legislation, such as Assembly Bill 617 (AB617), which will ultimately help identify and solve these air quality inequities by providing the critical evidence to support targeted investments, additional regulations or legislation.

      The California Air Resources Board (ARB) has done a good job summarizing the goals of AB617 as follows:

      “The goal of AB 617 is to ensure that everyone benefits from our state’s air quality efforts, especially those that live in the most severely pollution impacted areas of California. AB617 provides for:
      • Community level monitoring
      • Statewide strategy to reduce emissions impacting communities
      • Community-specific emission reduction plans
      • Accelerated retrofit of pollution control equipment at existing facilities near communities
      • Direct reporting of emissions to the CARB
      • Increased penalties”

      We believe it’s key to cost-effectively help the authorities and legislators by providing the data that can further drive the policies that will ultimately solve these inequities in disadvantaged communities. I hope we can connect at the Annual Summit next week!

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

Examining the Effects of Online Shopping on Last-Mile Freight

Featuring Dr. Alison Conway

In anticipation of tomorrow’s live webinar, we’ve spoken with Dr. Alison Conway regarding her research of last-mile freight issues in New York City. If you’re curious about what we’re going to discuss with Dr. Conway in tomorrow’s webinar, read on to today’s blog post and learn about how online shopping and on-demand delivery are affecting the streets and traffic patterns of New York City through delivery vehicles and issues of curb space zoning. Dr. Conway sheds light on the daily impacts to our cities from our online shopping habits, and talks about how we can change perceptions and policies to make progress.

3 Myths About Climate Adaptation Work

Urban areas are certainly important, but not exclusively so. Large swaths of population and economy reside in America’s suburbs, exurbs, and rural communities – each of which faces unique challenges that require tailored approaches. Americans outside urban areas not only recognize the impacts of climate change, they are driving unique adaptation approaches.

Dates and Deliverables from Blockchain

It’s easy to say that blockchain is the future, but it’s been observed that people who describe the future are merely futurists. “Those who can tell when a technology will reach the market? We call them Billionaires.” Can we say anything useful, and even slightly rigorous, about when this will matter to a larger group than technology’s chattering classes?