Maintaining Boston’s Vibrancy and Transportation Systems in the Face of Sea Level Rise

By Julie Wormser

Julie Wormser is VP for Policy and Planning for Boston Harbor Now, co-author of Preparing for the Rising Tide and Designing With Water, and co-led the Boston Living with Water international design competition with the City of Boston and Boston Society of Architects.

A city reclaimed from the sea

Settled by European colonists in 1630, Boston was founded on the narrow Shawmut Peninsula behind the protective landforms of what are today Stellwagen Bank, Winthrop, Hull and the 34 Boston Harbor Islands.

Our ancestors sited Boston well.  In addition to protecting the city from sea-based attacks, Boston Harbor’s natural topography limits extreme storm surges to a maximum of just over six feet.  With a ten-foot tide cycle, Boston is currently only at risk of serious flooding if such a surge occurs close to high tide.

Past Development Decisions Increase Future Flood Risk

Experienced mariners, our ancestors knew exactly how high such storm surges would go.  They confidently filled in estuaries and shallow bays to increase Boston’s footprint by over fifty percent.  Of course, they never contemplated sea level rise.

Unfortunately, these filled tidelands will begin to flood chronically with only 2-3 feet of sea level rise—predicted to occur sometime between 2070 and 2100.[1] (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. 1775 map of Boston’s original landforms vs. areas at risk of chronic flooding around 2070 under high emissions scenarios (Maps courtesy Library of Congress, MassDOT)

The City recently released Climate Ready Boston, in which top climate experts derived the following findings:

  • Boston is most likely to experience between 7.5 and 18 inches of relative sea level rise[2] by 2050, with a maximum plausible increase of 30 inches.
  • Depending on carbon emissions, Boston is likely to experience 3.2 to 7.4 feet of relative sea level rise by 2100, with a maximum plausible level of 10.5 feet.
  • Such higher seas will increase Boston’s tidal range, wave energy, and tidal flooding, resulting in increased erosion and higher storm surges.

At our country’s founding, Boston’s landmass was approximately 30 percent smaller than it is today.  Sometime between now and perhaps a century from now, Boston’s coastline will shrink back to its original configuration once sea levels rise by approximately eight feet.

Additional challenges will vex property managers and transportation officials as coastal flooding becomes chronic in Boston. For example:  How do we protect Boston’s transportation tunnels and other below-grade infrastructure from saltwater intrusion? Is it cost-effective to retrofit Boston’s existing buildings and infrastructure? Would district energy plants improve Boston’s energy resilience if specific neighborhoods are cut off from the grid? How can we maintain and even enhance the socioeconomic vibrancy of our city as our coastline moves inland over the coming decades?

Living with Water Design

The concept of Living with Water design[3] focuses on resilience (the ability to bounce back quickly and cheaply from flooding) versus resistance (preventing flooding from occurring in the first place).[4] In 2014, The Boston Harbor Association (now Boston Harbor Now), the City of Boston, Boston Redevelopment Authority (now Boston Planning and Development Agency) and Boston Society of Architects launched an international design competition called Boston Living With Water. The goal was to increase local understanding of flood-resilient design strategies at different scales by engaging with real sites at risk of chronic coastal flooding.

Fifty teams from seven countries worked to redesign a specific building, neighborhood and/or surface highway so that each would continue to thrive once sea levels are five feet higher than today.[5] The three winning entries came from two teams of local designers and a team located unsurprisingly in Venice, Italy. Each team won because it successfully combined feasible flood design strategies with multiple-benefit solutions.

Two critical insights emerged from our collective research, design competition and exchanges with experts from Copenhagen, The Netherlands and Hamburg. First, Boston will require multiple layers of flood protection—flood barriers, floodable transition zones, and flood-prepared buildings and infrastructure. Each will begin to fail as sea levels increase above the surrounding topography, ultimately requiring managed retreat.

Second, individual structures can only be made resilient to storm flooding, not chronic tidal flooding.  Once flooding becomes commonplace, regional strategies must be in place to protect the people, buildings, transportation systems and infrastructure of the Greater Boston region as a whole.

When the ocean reclaims its own

There will come a time in perhaps our children’s lifetimes when Boston Harbor will begin to reclaim its filled tidelands. It may come suddenly, with an extreme storm that swamps our defenses. It may happen more gradually, with infrastructure and/or buildings no longer worth the cost of retrofitting or rebuilding.

If we have the will and foresight, I hope that our future involves investing in a graceful waterfront barrier that staves off chronic flooding while maintaining a meaningful connection to the harbor.  I hope that we use this borrowed time to prepare the city for the day that the barrier is no longer sufficient and we must make city-wide changes.

Getting from here to there will involve substantial breakthroughs in financing and governance.  We will need to develop financial mechanisms for transferring real estate value away from the coastline without devastating either real estate values or Boston’s tax base. We will need new zoning and building codes that predict and adapt to the retreating coast.  We will need a central planning agency with a transparent, fair, effective governing structure able to plan, raise funds, secure public support and implement major civil engineering projects across a broad region and hundreds of property ownerships.

Surviving and thriving in a hotter, saltier future involves hope, involves beauty, and involves all of us working together to keep our dear old city from slipping back into the sea.  Boston will have to be different. It doesn’t have to be worse. Let’s get started.

On June 20, 2017, one hundred and twenty mobility and climate leaders will convene in Cambridge, Massachusetts to discuss the future of mobility in the face of climate change in the Boston region. While the Boston region continues to remain globally competitive, we are in an altogether unique moment in the history of mobility, transportation, and climate decisions. This summit aims to harness the ingenuity and innovation already underway in the Commonwealth as well as the expertise of invited global thought leaders with best practices directly applicable to Boston’s challenges.

If you are interested in attending this invite-only summit, please fill out this application. Please note that the summit is full and only waitlist spaces are still available.


[1] The map on the right depicts a portion of the results of a hydrodynamic model developed for the Massachusetts Department of Transportation showing the likelihood of flooding in 2070 under high emission scenarios.  The map on the left is from 1775.

[2] Global averages are just that; some areas of the earth will experience relatively faster sea level rise than others. Unfortunately, coastal New England will experience faster relative sea level rise than global averages due to ocean currents and land subsidence.

[3] The term of art “Living with Water” came out of a partnership collaboration planners and architects from The Netherlands and their counterparts in post-Hurricane Katrina New Orleans, especially Waggoner & Ball Architects.

[4] Visit www.BostonLivingWithWater.org/resources to download Designing with Water, which includes 12 case studies relevant to Boston.

[5] All materials and entries can be downloaded from www.BostonLivingWithWater.org

Discussion

Leave your comment below, or reply to others.

2 Comments

  1. Bill

    Wow, I’ve seldom seem a more vacuous article. Then sea rise numbers are fabricated out of alarmist predictions from failed models.

    Reply
  2. Jerry Roane

    We have three patents that might help raise city travel up out of danger. 6,923,124 7,127,999 and 7,334,524 Not only would transportation be affordably built well above the water level, it would produce no pollution that would in turn tend to decrease the water level rising over many decades.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

Combining Technologies to Bring Connectivity to the Community

Rhyzome Networks has undertaken a project to upgrade the equipment used for wireless access in order to create stronger connections between the root access points and the repeaters. Our new network does not rely on the original projects wireless mesh and fibre combination, and instead uses wireless point-to-point and fibre for the backhaul of information and the aging 7181 access points will be swapped out in favor of Aruba units.

Our journey into telecommunications began in 2009 as an initiative to provide a backhaul for Festival Hydro’s smart metering system. That project led us down a path to offering wireless and fibre optic connections. It became clear early on in the project that the infrastructure we were putting in place provided us with the opportunity to create a robust backbone that would support the offering of affordable internet and other connectivity options in a community that was, at the time, largely overlooked by the big players in the Canadian telecommunications space.

Indianapolis Revitalizing Neighborhoods Through Arts & Culture

As historian Mark I. Gelfand has noted: “No federal venture spent more funds in urban areas and returned fewer dividends to central cities than the national highway program.” A micro example of the devastating effect of the highway system developed through the core of Indianapolis is Cruft Street, with a dead end abutting I-65 near the I-65/I-70 split (completed in 1976) in the Garfield Park area of Indianapolis. Forty-two percent of houses in the area have incomes below $25,000, and 13.5 percent live on less than $10,000 a year. The low income demographic of the area results in 22 percent of adults over age 25 having no high school diploma and 81 percent with no college degree.

An examination of the Cruft Street neighborhood has spurred many nonprofit organizations in Indianapolis to question how the public sector can support the role of arts and culture in revitalizing the Cruft Street neighborhood.

How to Build More Connected and Inclusive Cities

When thinking about the cities of the future, I know that they will be more connected, and I strongly believe that they must be more inclusive. We can’t have the Internet of Everything without the Inclusion of Everyone. Already today, a growing number of cities are using smart technologies to better connect people to places and to each other – and more importantly also connecting people to opportunities for better and safer lives.

Unfortunately, what still causes a significant amount of friction in our cities and prevents inclusive growth is the dominance of cash. In fact, close to 85 percent of all consumer payments in the world are still done with cash or checks. This means that far too many people are trapped by default in an informal economy. They lack the financial services to guard themselves against risk, save for themselves, plan for their children’s futures, and build better lives.

Meeting of the Minds is made possible by the generous support of these organizations.