The average city procurement officer spends upwards of 15 hours researching cost, quality, and compliance specifications before deciding on where to spend our taxpayer dollars. This process is made more difficult by outdated systems and the many intricacies of policy...
In Nigeria, the government’s anti-corruption campaign relies in part on this data NGO
By Brendon Bosworth
Nigeria has a less-than-rosy reputation for corruption. The country ranks 136th out of 176 on Transparency International’s most recent Corruption Perceptions Index.
This is a widely understood domestic reputation, too. President Muhammadu Buhari came into office in 2015 explicitly pledging to stamp out corruption. And indeed, the government’s campaign has since seen the revival of institutions such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
Yet there remains a need for improved transparency, asset declaration by public officers and open contracting, says Oluseun Onigbinde, co-founder of BudgIT, a civic tech organization that tracks public spending in Nigeria.
“Bailouts have been given to state government without adequate transparency mechanisms,” he said. “The anti-corruption war needs to be properly thought [through] and reviewed.”
To play its part in improving transparency in Nigeria, BudgIT since its 2011 inception has rolled out various data-driven initiatives. Those include simplified reports and infographics on state and federal budgets. The initiative has also created an online tool — Tracka — for tracking the implementation of government infrastructure and service provision projects at the sub-national level.
The online tool is supplemented by work on the ground. Tracka officers meet with communities to discuss budget provisions for local projects, and in turn support residents in communicating with public officials about these initiatives.
The initiative has important implications for Nigeria’s cities. Tracka officers have used the tool to keep tabs on the Lagos state government’s progress on road construction in the Lagos metropolis, for instance, documenting as many as 263 shoddy roads, according to BudgIT’s impact report.
“I believe corruption requires at least three things to thrive: excessive discretion, iron-cast opacity and weak institutions,” said Onigbinde. “We do our best to give this information to the citizens, incentivizing them to demand effective service delivery and efficiency.”
While federal government data in Nigeria is publicly available, state-level data is very difficult to get, said Onigbinde: “It’s very important that the information is used for community impact.”
With offices in Lagos and Abuja, the BudgIT team produces and shares a host of budget-related documents, available from its website. These include proposed and final state and federal budgets, as well as budgets for federal government departments like the ministries of water resources and transport.
These state budgets directly impact Nigeria’s cities. They contain financial allocations for urban development, housing, urban renewal, street lighting, road rehabilitation and construction, and other city-related services and infrastructure.
BudgIT currently engages with communities in 14 states. It aims to expand to 20 states by the end of year.
The group’s efforts have found support with the Omidyar Network and Gates Foundation, which recently committed close to a combined USD 3 million for the organization’s work over the next three to four years.
“BudgIT stands out as a great example of an organization that is deeply committed to ensuring that citizens have the information they need to hold their government accountable,” Ory Okolloh, Omidyar Network’s director for investments, said in a statement.
National Assembly ‘watchdog’
While BudgIT works on the ground with communities, it also actively engages with governments at all levels.
The organization was instrumental in prompting the Nigerian government to join the Open Government Partnership, a multilateral anti-corruption and improved transparency initiative.
“We are trying to get more transparency in government,” said Onigbinde. “Whatever we find, we also make sure that we push it across government.”
A recent report looking at the federal government’s proposed 2017 budget identifies “frivolous and suspicious items.” It painstakingly picks apart proposed allocations by each department, with comments about why certain allocations are under scrutiny. For instance, the report asks why there is a nearly 656 percent increase over 2016 levels for “office stationeries and computer consumables” in the legal aid council’s proposed budget.
BudgIT uses reports such as this to engage with government officials on spending. The group sends its findings to the National Assembly, with which it has a partnership, thereby acting as a “watchdog,” according to Onigbinde.
“At any time we find that there’s an opportunity for engagement, to have conversations, we do that,” he said.
And thus far, he says, national-level officials have been welcoming of the BudgIT findings.
“We want to make sure that there is a conversation around issues, around transparency in Nigeria,” Onigbinde said. “I’m happy that the National Assembly appreciates the work that we’re doing.”
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
In recent years, a variety of forces (economic, environmental, and social) have quickly given rise to “shared mobility,” a collective of entrepreneurs and consumers leveraging technology to share transportation resources, save money, and generate capital. Bikesharing services, such as BCycle, and business-to-consumer carsharing services, such as Zipcar, have become part of a sociodemographic trend that has pushed shared mobility from the fringe to the mainstream. The role of shared mobility in the broader landscape of urban mobility has become a frequent topic of discussion. Shared transportation modes—such as bikesharing, carsharing, ridesharing, ridesourcing/transportation network companies (TNCs), and microtransit—are changing how people travel and are having a transformative effect on smart cities.
A study by the US National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in 2008 found that the impact of routine weather events on the US economy equates annually to about 3.4% of the country’s GDP (about $485 billion). This excludes the impact of extreme weather events that cause damage and disruption – after all, even “ordinary” weather affects supply of and demand for many items, and the propensity of businesses and consumers to buy them. NCAR found that mining and agriculture are particularly sensitive to weather influences, with utilities and retail not far behind.
Many of these, disaster management included, are the focus of smart city innovations. Not surprisingly, therefore, as they seek to improve and optimize these systems, smart cities are beginning to understand the connection between weather and many of their goals. A number of vendors (for example, IBM, Schneider Electric, and others) now offer weather data-driven services focused specifically on smart city interests.