Beyond the Green Roof: Greenhouses Grow Possibilities for Urban Building Owners

By Mohamed Hage

Mohamed Hage is founder and president of Lufa Farms, 01-1400 Antonio-Barbeau Montréal, Québec, H4N 1H5 Contact him at

Feb 18, 2013 | Smart Cities | 2 comments

A green, or “living,” roof is one that is partially or completely covered with vegetation. Forward-thinking cities are looking to green roofs and gardens to help reduce building temperatures, filter pollution, lessen pressure on sewer systems, and reduce the heat island effect.

Toronto is one of these forward-thinking cities. In January 2010, Toronto began offering industrial and commercial building owners up to $100,000 per year to make so-called “green roofs” of their rooftops.

Moreover, Toronto became the first city in North American to require green roofs for developments over a certain size. Starting in 2010, large, new urban developments had to devote 20-60 percent of available roof space to a green-roof construction.

A New ‘Last’ Frontier

Steven Peck of the Toronto-based non-profit Green Roofs for Healthy Cities (GRHC) calls city rooftops “the last urban frontier.” He says the “wasted space” on rooftops makes up 15 percent to 35 percent of the total urban land area. GRHC also concurs with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s assertion that green roofs mitigate the urban heat island effect.

Just as the green roofs cool city neighborhoods, so too can green roofs save owners money on the cooling — and heating — of their buildings.  GRHC cites field experiments in Ottawa that found that an extensive, 6-inch green roof can reduce heat gains by 95 percent and heat losses by 26 percent, compared to a conventional roof.

Rooftop Greenhouses

In Canada and the Northern United States, open-air farms on green roofs are limited by the short growing season. So, in colder climates, rooftop greenhouses are emerging as logical vehicle to deliver a year-round harvest of fresh, local produce to city dwellers.

For building owners, rooftop greenhouses will likely offer some of the same benefits as green roofs, namely, efficient water use and collection, heat-island mitigation, and better insulation.

[vimeo url=”″ width=”300″ height=”169″ fs=”0″ portrait=”0″]

My company, Lufa Farms, uses a 31,000-square-foot rooftop greenhouse in Montreal to grow garden-fresh greens and vegetables atop a sturdy commercial building, near, fittingly, the Marche Central, the one-time farmers’ wholesale market that is now a retail shopping center. We’re also building a second rooftop greenhouse in Laval.

Since Lufa’s greenhouses are the first of their kind and size in the world, my colleagues and I have had to become evangelists and urban pioneers to overcome hurdles related to zoning, building codes and engineering, legal, leasehold, and taxation issues.

Overcoming Zoning Challenges

Finding the right buildings also pose a challenge, with crucial questions to be answered: Is the building right structurally? What are the height issues? Does it have the proper access and zoning?

Prior to building our first greenhouse, Montreal had no zoning for agricultural buildings or local building codes for agricultural construction. (The last of the city’s farms had disappeared some 30 years ago when Montreal urbanized and the old farmland was rezoned.)

Ultimately, the local zoning departments have been receptive and have revised the zoning and have accepted national building codes for the permitting.

It’s Working in Montreal, so…

Over the next five-to-seven years, we will be scouting in Toronto, Boston, New York, Philadelphia and Chicago for existing buildings on which to site more greenhouses. We are also looking to partner with developers interested in constructing new buildings with greenhouses integrated into the designs.

If you’re planning a large building, a greenhouse is even more feasible if you plan it from the start. The optimal (and less expensive) solution is to design the building to support hybridized use.

In addition to a rental revenue stream, an obvious economic benefit for city buildings are lower maintenance cost, since a roof beneath a greenhouse is protected from the weather.

Similar to a green roof, a roof greenhouse will typically reduces a building’s utility costs, too: the structure insulates in the winter so the floors underneath do not need as much heat. In the summer the greenhouse provides a degree of cooling through plant transpiration, so that the building will have a lower demand for air conditioning.  If the design operates as planned, the owner will be able to earn credits toward certification as a Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design building.

A couple of things to keep in mind if you are investigating a rooftop greenhouse for your building:

  • The structure must support the weight of the greenhouse
  • The roof must be flat
  • The structure must meet local snow-load requirements
  • The roof should have an area of 100,000-200,000 square feet of space for the greenhouse
  • To pass through zoning, the building should ideally be located in a commercial, residential or industrial area

Got questions? I’m happy to talk to you anytime about what else we’ve learned at Lufa Farms.


Leave your comment below, or reply to others.


  1. Hi! Any advice for a homeowner doing a rooftop greenhouse? We are building a home in Utah, and are planning a roof top garden and greenhouse. I am pouring through info online, but am not finding much. We ideally would have a flat roof greenhouse, but everything I see is sloped. Is there a specific reason for this? We know we’d need to have the roof ventilate somehow. We are definitely going to do glass. I know its small scale, but anything you’ve learned and can pass along would be appreciated!!!

    • the slope is because of the rain and snow, so they don’t stay on the roof!


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog

Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology

For Walkers, The Last Six Inches are Important

It is no surprise to those of us in the walking advocacy world that making bus stops accessible and linked to neighborhood sidewalks can increase bus ridership and reduce the number of para-transit trips that are called for. This is a logical outcome of thinking about how people make real life choices about how to get around. What this research demonstrates is an amazing win-win-win for walking and transit advocates. It shows how we can shift trips from autos to transit; give more people more independence by making it possible for them to use regular bus service rather than setting up special, scheduled para-transit trips (some of which require appointments to be made at least 24 hours in advance and only for specified purposes); and save money for transit systems over the long run.