Creative Financing for Revitalizing Cities
With Meeting of the Minds beginning tomorrow—and, in general, as the buzz around cities, energy and economic growth becomes louder—one sometimes wonders if we are speaking about the right things that we want to accomplish in our cities, and subsequently how to make these happen.
In my view initially we should look beyond some of the ‘must do’ arguments and the mathematics, and start working on enhancing real awareness about the economic and therewith the financial potential of making our cities more energy efficient, and more sustainable. This also means a deepening of our understanding of what innovations mean for the citizens and – thus – how revitalizing our existing cities is key for our economies as well as quality of life.
It is true that – as with many innovative solutions – the latest intelligent LED lighting offers the potential for substantial reductions in carbon emissions and energy expenditures. On a global level the transition to energy efficient lighting can provide a 670 megaton reduction in CO2 emissions, and a monetary saving of €128 billion / US$ 168 billion. It is however also becoming apparent that modern LED lighting increases citizens sense of safety, makes cities more inviting for tourism, and increases productivity at our workplaces (without having to work harder). See, for example: Lighting the Clean Revolution: The Rise of LEDs and What It Means for Cities
The social benefits are in my view arguments that can be further leveraged in enhancing the momentum for change though public engagement. Of significant importance is that from a city perspective the improvements in quality of life go hand in hand with reduced public expenditure on energy, as well as with the creation of jobs, as a significant number of people can be put to work on the renovation of buildings and street-lighting.
What does this mean for creative financing of revitalization projects and initiatives? As an enabler we can look at how policies can contribute to accelerating and scaling-up of sustainable financing in cities / public projects? What financing mechanisms do we see emerging that should go into a financing toolbox, so that financing (instead of transactional approaches) become common practice in cities?
One approach that we are working on at Philips is to move from selling products (like streetlighting fixtures) to offering cities lighting as a service. In dedicated Public Private Partnerships (with financial institutions; installation and maintenance operations, as well as local utilities) a city receives a blueprint for intelligent LED street-lighting, where the initial investment is covered by the savings in energy and maintenance cost over lifetime, thus having the city pay a fixed amount per month during the period of the service contract. This takes away the initial investment barrier, and helps accelerating the revitalization of the city, while focusing on and optimizing the quality of the (lighting) service that is of most interest to the livability of the city.
How can we increase awareness of this creative financing option, and what other creative financing approaches can we develop and apply?
For more information on how intelligent LED streetlighting improves the livability of cities see also: Shining a light on the cities of the future.
Leave your comment below, or reply to others.
Read more from the Meeting of the Minds Blog
Spotlighting innovations in urban sustainability and connected technology
The Environmental Impact Bond. It can be used to finance green infrastructure and similar resiliency-oriented projects, which not only protect cities against flooding and pollution, but also create jobs and green underserved neighborhoods. The return to investors of these projects is based on the extent to which the projects produce results; such as the amount of stormwater diverted from flowing into nearby rivers.
To plan for the transition to automated vehicles, cities and county governments should develop building and zoning codes that not only accommodate adaptable parking but encourage it by design. This can include amending building codes to require infrastructure that makes transforming garages into inhabitable buildings possible. As automated vehicles begin to enter the marketplace, cities should consider incentives and other programs to begin the conversion of ground level parking to commercial uses.
For much of the twentieth century, transportation planning focused on moving cars as efficiently as possible. This resulted in streets that are designed for cars, with little room for transit vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. Agencies in charge of roads, signals, parking, taxis and transit need to collaborate more closely to focus on moving people, not just vehicles, as efficiently as possible.
Focusing on all the elements that matters to people not just travel time – It is clear that people travelling across the region have high expectations and want to have consistent, reliable, convenient, clean and low-cost travel options regardless of their preferred mode and what municipal boundaries they cross. People care little about what system they are on or who operates it—they simply want to get where they are going as quickly, comfortably and reliably as possible.